Sophia Tsang /

First my congratulations at winning the recent elections. It was a photo-finish, but a win nonetheless. Winning the elections however, is not the same as winning the hearts and confidence of the people you represent.

I am a resident of Potong Pasir. I love this estate and the residents. Some people called my estate a slum during the election period. Say what they like, there is so much charm in this estate – maybe precisely because we had not much money, and so we relied on the charm of the natural green trees, the meandering river and the kampong spirit.

Let me tell you about the kampong spirit. My house is in the middle of a block. My windows are constantly open. To some, it means a lack of privacy – but to me, it gives me great opportunity to see my neighbours go by – to have a chat, if they have time, to complain about the weather, to share the excitement of the rallies, or simply just to wave and smile. When my husband and I spent extended time overseas, they could be relied on to help my children in emergencies. When we bake, or cook, we would just pass some on. Sometimes the ladies would just gather for tea, or sing karaoke at one of our homes.

Recently, when the PA organized a trip to Marina Bay Sands, neighbours gathered later to share photos and have a drink. But do you know what is amazing about all this? The number who are pro-Chiam vs pro-PAP – that is, you – is about even. That is to say, in the households on my side of the lift, on my floor, we are split 50-50 in political allegiance. Yet, we do not fight or argue. We are friends and neighbours, and in the spirit of democracy, we understand the choice is a personal one.

This is true not just of my group of friends. This is true of Potong Pasir. Mr Chiam has won many elections, but the last few fights were pretty close. If you were to go to the coffee shops, I bet even on the same table, the votes are split. That we enjoy so much camaraderie – just go to the coffee shops, and see neighbours having coffee, looking after grandchildren and simply having a blast – is testament to mutual respect, and in a way shows a respect for Mr Chiam and his work.

Hence for those who are strongly pro oppositon/Chiam, I feel that what is in order is to thank the pro-PAP residents for their many years of tolerance, and to thank the Chiams, who by their very gentle and compassionate nature, have helped built this sweet harmony that is the essence of the kampong spirit.

But coming back to you, Mr Sitoh. Yes, many residents are looking forward to upgrading and new facilities. Especially those who are old and find it difficult to climb steps or stairs. I hope that you will do something quickly to help them. However, it is not a matter of sticks and stones, mortar and cement. To win the people’s hearts, you have to show you care, to show you hear.

Hence I want to bring your attention to the latest spat you are having with the Singapore People’s Party (SPP) regarding the 16 former Town Council workers. Let it not descend to a “I said”/“You said” situation. I was not there when the entire conversation between you and Lina took place. Unless someone had a recording, it is still a matter of my words against yours. That however is not the real issue.

The issue is to do the right thing by the people. It is not about simply recommending them jobs, if you feel bound by EM Services’ rules to terminate their employment. Did you take time to hear them out? Did you ask them how they might feel regarding working in a totally different environment, with new colleagues? Did you check what their financial situations are? Are the terms offered by EM Services acceptable, given that they do have relevant experience? Is there more that can be done for them? We are not talking legalities – we are talking about the human touch. Please note – I am not saying you did not – I am asking if you did.

The human touch is what makes Potong Pasir so different from many other communities. While some are looking forward to the physical improvement of the estate, many others will be looking at how you treat your staff. If it is perceived that you cannot treat 16 people with compassion, how can the almost 50 per cent who voted for Lina trust you to have compassion for their struggles or to be their voice in parliament?

Perceptions and impressions, once formed, are very difficult to change. I hope you will start right – or else I am afraid, the bickering may well descend to neighbours and friends, each taking sides.

May our kampong spirit remain.

———-

Picture from Alvinology.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

66 arrested for suspected involvement in organised crime

61 men and 5 women, aged between 17 and 63, were arrested…

盛港市镇会委独立小组 接手白沙榜鹅市镇会诉讼事宜

工人党盛港市镇理事会宣布,已委任由三名律师组成的独立小组,行使市镇会权限,针对白沙-榜鹅市镇会(PRPTC)上诉事宜作决策。 盛港市镇会指出,他们在本月5日已委任三名律师:骆维明( Lok Vi Ming)高级律师、Kenneth Tan高级律师和Kevin Y.L. Tan高级律师。 盛港市镇会声明指出,三人独立小组将基于该市镇会的最佳利益,独立和秉公地采取相关行动,且还同意不收取任何服务报酬,该市镇会也对三名律师接受委任,表达谢意。 7月22日,国家发展部指随着榜鹅东区纳入盛港市镇理事会,白沙-榜鹅市镇会诉讼,也将移交给盛港市镇会。 对此,盛港市镇会主席何廷儒曾表示,将致力于确保从前朝市镇会顺利交接事务。“针对进行中的诉讼管理之所有决策,我们也将确保是公平、透明和符合法律的。” 早前,该市镇会已在8月10日向高庭申请,要求工人党市镇会上诉案延后审理。…

美国会高票通过《香港人权与民主法案》,引起中国不满

美国联邦众议院一致通过《香港人权与民主法案》,授权美国总统每年审视香港自治情况,按需要调整美国对香港的贸易特别待遇。 综合各媒体报导,当中美国联邦众议院在当地时间昨日(15日)下午,针对《香港人权与民主法案》、《保护香港法案》和《与香港站在一起》决议案进行投票,三项法案都以口头方式获得无异议通过。《香港人权与民主法案》在成为法律以前,必须透过参议院进行投票,而众所周知,美国国会极为分化,但此次法案却罕见得到两党支持。 此次法案通过,被视为是美国政府回应近期香港示威浪潮的重要一步。 众议院议长佩洛西表示,如果美国因为商业利益,拒绝为中国的人权问题发声,那美国将丧失为世界其他地方人权课题发声的道德权威性。 香港示威持续近4个月以来,从最初反对修例《逃犯条例》,开放管道将嫌犯引渡至中国,至今已经扩展到香港主权问题。据维权人士表示,尽管香港与中国于有着一国两制的协议,但北京政府亦试图削弱香港主权。 因此,该法案要求美国国务院需每年对香港进行审视,若达不到尊重人权与法治的原则,美国将会终止与香港的贸易。此外,该法案亦要求美国总统需查明对香港自治产生严重破坏与侵犯的人。 众议院民主党鲁杨(Ben Ray Lujan)表示,“刚刚已向香港市民发出了与他们站在同一阵线的信息,支持他们为民主和正义而战。 ” 香港民主党主席胡志伟接受BBC访问时认为,来自国际社会的压力对解决香港目前的局势有帮助。 他指出,香港始终是个国际城市,与多国都有联系,如果国际社会聚焦香港的人权问题,“这会给中国大陆政府施压,令它必须以不同的方式看待问题”。…

TOC Op-ed: Awake, Jim Sleeper

By Choo Zheng Xi/ Consultant Editor Yale lecturer Jim Sleeper’s provocatively titled…