Andrew loh /

British author Alan Shadrake’s appeal against a conviction for contempt of court was dismissed by the Singapore Court of Appeal on Friday.

The author was arrested in July last year, the day after he had launched his book, Once A Jolly Hangman, at a public event. (See here.)

Mr Shardrake was eventually charged and found guilty of “scandalizing the judiciary” last November for comments he made in his book, which highlighted the use of the death penalty in Singapore. He was sentenced to six weeks jail and a S$20,000 fine.

The book highlighted prominent capital cases which had occurred in Singapore and questioned the handling of these cases. In bringing charges against Mr Shadrake in November, Singapore’s Attorney General said “public confidence in the Singapore Judiciary cannot be allowed, in any way, to be tarnished or diminished by any contumacious behaviour.”

Mr Shadrake’s defence was based on Article 14 of the Singapore Constitution which provides for “fair criticism on matters of compelling public interest.”

It was dismissed by the court.

In response to Friday’s Court of Appeal dismissal, international rights group, Human Rights Watch (HRW), said the verdict was “a major setback for free expression in Singapore.”

“The prosecution of Alan Shadrake for doing nothing more than calling for legal reform is a devastating blow to free speech in Singapore,” said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at HRW. “More broadly, until the government releases its iron grip on basic freedoms, the Singaporean people will remain all the poorer.”

Once A Jolly Hangman is planned to be released in the US and the UK in the coming months.

Mr Shadrake has been allowed by the courts to undergo a medical test before serving his jail term on Wednesday.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Orders of Detention issued against two Singaporeans under the Internal Security Act for radicalisation

Kuthubdeen Haja Najumudeen and Suderman bin Samikin, both Singaporeans, were detained under…

无牌电工接电不当 断路器故障 验尸官揭两年前触电少年死因

两年前一名15岁少年陈耀斌,在组屋单位冲凉时触电不幸身亡。近期透过验尸官质询调查揭露,无照电工安设热水器的电路不当、断路器(circuit breaker)故障,导致这名少年触电致死。 修电工把无法负荷超过13A电流的三脚插头,用来为热水器接电。加之断路器故障无法及时断电,导致死者在冲凉时触电。 2015年,死者居住的组屋进行家居改进计划(HIP),死者母亲要求请修电工来添换新的热水器。于是建屋发展局接洽当时的HIP承包商Precise Development,后者则安排旗下负责电工的分包商JL 工程建筑派工友来安装。 工友用三脚插头衔接热水器,再接到普通的墙式三脚插座。工头区家雄(译音)当时也测试了电路和断电器,都正常运作。 但是,三脚插头和墙式插座,原本就无法符合热水器电流,在法医质询上,区开雄承认这么做并不安全,但他以为他的工作只是让“厕所里原有事物保持原状”。厕所旧的热水器也是用三脚插头,于是他仍照旧使用。 修电工无修电执照 区家雄在居家改进计划中,负责数个组屋承包工程的管工。他负责监督单位厕所的点射铺设,也检查断电器的运作。 然而,验尸官发现,区家雄虽然精通电工,但是和他的工人都无修电执照。区家雄说到过30座组屋修电,其中有78仙的热水器都是用三脚插头接电的。 他供证说,他一般会提醒正进行家居改进计划的住户,上述接电法并不安全,也会献议客户更换。但是当时他没有机会和死者家属见上一面。…

林志蔚解析最低薪金制 经济讲师要工人党先实验政策提案?

上周,工人党盛港候任议员、也是一名经济学者的林志蔚,分析政府渐进式薪金模式和最低薪金制的差异。即便最低薪金制不是毫无疑问的好政策,但却是能改善雇员处境的良好开端,近期的研究,也倾向支持最低薪资制,即时薪资涨幅很大,对于低薪工友的就业问题实则带来冲击微小。 不过,新加坡管理大学经济系高级讲师吴正晓,在《联合早报》的交流站则表示要给林志蔚“两个建议”,认为对工人党的政策如最低薪金制不能“为了同意而同意”;再者也建议若林志蔚认为工人党政策可行,如冗员保险可先在盛港市镇会试行看下效果如何。 由于目前在冠病疫情影响下,对经济和社会造成冲击,他认为林志蔚在电视辩论,却提起最低薪金制感到惊讶,因为大部分经济学家都会反对在失业率上升、经济下行之时,实行最低薪金制。 “林志蔚把视野放到疫情后” 但民众林师顺也在另一篇文章强调,大选不仅仅是为了克服此次疫情举行,也是决定国家未来五年发展由谁带领。“身为在野党一员的林博士,把视野放到冠病疫情后的新加坡,在辩论中有此发言,并不奇怪。” 他认为吴正晓似乎误解了林志蔚,为何在辩论时提出最低薪资和冗员保险等提案。 在新加坡现有的渐进式薪金模式下的低薪员工,也是重要的劳动力,给予他们一定的薪资,应超越学术经济分析,是社会应该在解决贫富差距的课题上所进行的讨论。 吴正晓是在评论中指出,最低薪金制在目前仍有争议,尽管部分经济学家赞同,但大部分都会坚决反对在失业率上升和经济下行时,提高最低薪资。 至于冗员保险,他则分析假设一名员工一生工作40年,大概只有40/280(七分之一)的机会,他能够领取到这个保险赔付。 羊毛出在羊身上。以每月4元的保费,如果想这个保险能够持续可行,那么平均每1万3428÷4=3357个月,也即大约每280年,员工可以拿到一次保险赔付。 他认为低保费,高赔付的保险产品是存在的,只是大部分顾客永远得不到赔付。 “五年以后,在下一次大选的辩论会上,在推荐新政策的时候,如果林博士可以说他们已经“实验过了”(done…

S’pore politicians all praise for swimmer Yip Pin Xiu’s gold medal win at Tokyo Paralympics

Congratulations and praises have poured in for Singapore’s Yip Pin Xiu after…