Leong Sze Hian, Alex Lew /

“Nothing’s sacrosanct in Government review of policies.”PM Lee Hsien Loong.

I would like to applaud the Prime Minister for his bold changes to the cabinet.

I believe what Singaporeans would like to see going forward is what changes will be made to address the myriad of issues raised in the elections.

As about half a dozen Ministers have said that the PAP needs to be transformed, I would like to make the following suggestions to review HDB’s policies:-

1) Remove the income ceiling of $2,000 for two-room flats, as it makes the simplistic assumption that every household earning more than $2,000 can afford a three-room flat, regardless of the family size, financial circumstances, etc.

2) Reverse the policy change to increase the rental for households earning more than $800 after two years, as a family earning between $800 and $1,500, may already be finding it hard to make ends meet.

3) Review the policy change requiring those applying for a second HDB Concessionary Loan to utilise half of the previous flat’s cash profits as well as the entire CPF utilised including acccrued interest, regardless of how long ago was the previous flat’s sale.

4) Review the policy change to permanently bar those who have sold two HDB flats from renting a HDB flat, as it assumes that one can never be in financial difficulty after selling one’s flat.

5) Review the policy requiring divorced couples without children to return their HDB flat to the HDB if the flat was purchased for less than five years, based on HDB’s valuation.

6) Review the Resale Levy which for example, requires a cash levy of $50,000 for those who buy a second new flat, regardless of how long ago the previous five-room flat was sold.

7) Give priority to needy Singaporeans for rental flats, instead of having a HDB joint-venture private company to rent HDB flats to non-Singaporeans for profit.

8) Review the cash-over-valuation (COV) policy to allow banks to lend the COV amount as well subject to say a five per cent valuation cap, as I know of no country in the world that places such a huge financial obstacle to public housing ownership, particularly for the lower-income who may have more difficulty coming up with the cash COV.

9) Disclose the breakdown of the costs of building HDB flats. Consider gradually shifting the current Market Pricing Subsidy policy to a more balanced Cost-Plus Pricing policy like in the 1980s and before. The fact that it will take about 10 years for a new flat to be available in the resale market because of the BTO construction time and the five-year Minimum Occupation Period (MOP), may have a minimal effect on resale prices, and moderate price increases instead.

10) Review the policy requiring divorced couples to re-finance their HDB loan even when the court order results in one of the divorced spouses to keep the flat with his or her children. This may cause undue hardship, as the ability to take another housing loan is re-assessed. The existing HDB loan should be allowed to continue.

11) Review the very high 10 per cent penalty for engaged couples who want to withdraw their application as they do not wish to be married.

12) Review the current Build-to-order (BTO) policy of reserving 95 per cent for first-timers, and an unknown percentage for grassroots volunteers, as it makes it very difficult for second-timers such as those in financial difficulty or down-graders to ever get a new flat.

13) HDB Annual Reports’ ‘applications for financial assistance approved’ statistics, have disappeared from its 2005/2006 Annual Report onwards. These statistics should continue to be published.

14) Publish the statistics on the following:- How many HDB bank loans are in arrears over three months?

15) How many HDB bank loans have been foreclosed by banks?

16) How many foreigners and PRs in total are staying in SERS (Selective En-bloc Re-Development Scheme) HDB flats, former JTC, SIT, etc, flats as rental tenants?

17) How many Singaporean siblings below 35 successfully applied to buy HDB resale flats under the former ‘siblings’ policy which was terminated in March 2011. How may PR siblings have successfully applied?

18) How many HDB households were unable to pay their Service and Conservancy Fees (S&CC) in a year? How many have been charged in court for not paying, in a year?

I would like to urge and call upon all public housing stakeholders to work with and support our new National Development Minister, Mr Khaw Boon Wan, to reform our public housing.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

AWARE responds to Budget 2014 announcements

AWARE has issued a media statement in response to Budget 2014, as…

黄循财国会谈防疫 感谢前线人员潸然泪下

政府跨部门工作小组联合主席黄循财昨日(25日)在国会时,谈及截至目前的防疫历程,对于一切给予我国帮助的子民例如前线人员,或是曾为防疫贡献自己的一份力量的人民,他表示,“对于为我国作出的贡献,千言万语都无法表达我的万分感谢之情”,甚至数度哽咽落泪。 他在国会上表示,我国仍有无数名无名英雄正为防疫工作默默努力,如清洁、餐饮、保安、机场管理、媒体等领域的新加坡人。他们目前仍坚持不懈,也有不少新加坡人在艰难时刻为防疫贡献自己力所能及的力量,照顾和关怀其他新加坡人。 他也吁请新加坡人继续团结一心,尽一分力对抗冠病。 “对于为我国作出的贡献,千言万语都无法表达我的万分感谢之情”,并数度哽咽落泪,请议员给予他缓冲的时间,他也不停擦拭眼泪。 视频一出,也立即引起网民的关注,许多网民纷纷也致谢部长在这数个月以来,辛苦努力在进行防疫工作,并批评那些在疫情肆虐期间仍到处“趴趴走”的人,应尽好社会责任,确保每个人的安全。 部分网民称仍不是掉眼泪的时候 但也有人认为,每次在宣布政策措施后的暧昧和滞后,才会导致疫情加重,而且无法管好执意出国染病的人,都不是掉几滴眼泪就可以解决,而且现在人民正在艰难时刻,部长们却还享有高薪工作。如果真的诚心诚意,就应该减薪,共度时艰。   除了感谢部长以外,还有网友向目前正在前线作战的医务人员表达感谢,他们选择放下自身的恐惧,共赴前线作好第一层防疫与治疗工作,并且截至今日仍在坚守岗位,值得令人敬佩。   

Civil activists’ letter of solidarity in support of WP’s Raeesah Khan

Civil activists Rachel Zeng and Sangeetha Thanapal have written a letter of…