Leong Sze Hian

“Nothing’s sacrosanct in Government review of policies.”PM Lee Hsien Loong.

I refer to the article “’Improve affordability, accessibility and adequacy of healthcare’” (Today, May 21) .

I would like to applaud the Prime Minister for his bold changes to the cabinet would like to make the following suggestions to reform healthcare in Singapore.

1) Increase public spending on healthcare from the current approximately two per cent of GDP, as it is one of the lowest in the world.

2) Reverse the trend of increasing private healthcare spending’s share of total healthcare spending from the historical 25 to the current approximately 50 per cent. In other words, increase the public healthcare share from 25 per cent back to the former 50 per cent.

3) Allow the use of Medifund for the needy who cannot afford polyclinic out-patient treatment, instead of transferring $86 million of Medifund surpluses to the Protected Reserves.

4) The rejection rate of Singaporeans who apply for Medifund because they could not pay for their medical bills has never been disclosed. The Ministry of Health (MOH) discloses yearly the number of successful applications (number of times), but not the number of patients who were rejected.

5) Make public the criteria for approving Medifund applications.

6) Singapore’s Standard Drug List is not made public. If made public, we may know what drugs are non-subsidised.

7) Does Medishield make a profit? What is the surplus if any?

8) How many people who were discharged from hospital were unable to pay their medical bills? The latest statistics from Credit Counselling Singapore is that about 21 per cent of Singaporeans who sought credit counselling were due to medical fees.

9) Review the change in the Workmen’s Injury Act reducing employers’ and insurers’ liability for medical expenses arising from an accident in the course of employment to $25,000. According to MOH, 5 per cent of industrial accidents’ medical fees exceed this $25,000 cap, which places the burden of the excess medical fees not covered on the employee.

10) Review the policy of public hospitals in not giving any subsidy for subsidised wards hospitalisation for industrial accidents. This means that for example, Class C ward fees would cost five times more compared to non-industrial accident hospitalisation.

11) Reduce the pressure on public hospitals to raisie medical fees such that hospitalisation costs at public hospitals have gone up by as much as double over the last four years, by reimbursing hospitals for the actual subsidy shown in medical bills, instead of using the MOH’s average treatment type subsidy computation.

12) Review means testing for patients who request for down-grading to lower-class hospital wards. The last disclosed 99 per cent rejection rate in Parliament, for down-grading applications may be forcing more Singaporeans to choose lower class subsidised wards.

I would like to urge and call upon all healthcare stakeholders to work with and support our new Health Minister, Mr Gan Kim Yong, to reform our healthcare system.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

哈佛赞我国对武汉冠病检测系统“几近完美”

武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)在我国爆发至今已有77宗确诊病例,而我国的检测系统获得了美国哈佛大学赞扬,几乎“接近完美的黄金水准”。 哈佛大学研究员指出,我国的检测能力几乎完美,因为截止本月4日,我国已经成功检测出18起病例。 他们表示,若其他国家拥有同样的检测能力,估计全球可检测到的输入型病例会是目前的将近三倍。 研究员指出,我国在监测疾病和追踪接触者方面的能力和表现,一直以来都非常强。 当局表示,由于全球检测输入型病例的能力甚至没有我国的一半,因此估计病毒持续传播的潜在风险依然存在。

品尝超市饮料再放回货架 二青少年认罪

今年2月在超市内将果汁逐个打开、品尝后放回架子上的两名青少年今日(7月16日)面控,皆对自己的行为表示认罪。 据法庭文件指出,两名被告分别是17岁,负责拍摄的Quek Xuan Zhi和18岁的Nigel Pang Yew Ming。两人于2月6日下午6时45分,在武吉巴督西7道的一家超市内,抽出数瓶果汁、品尝后放回架子上,并将有关短片放到Quek Xuan Zhi的社交媒体Instagram账户上。 17岁的被告还在短片上标题了 “传播新冠病毒的方法” ,当时就吸引了逾千人关注。…

社论:与其变成“津贴国” 何不普及化医疗服务?

日前,荣誉国务资政吴作栋在脸书发文指出,新加坡虽然避免了福利国的隐患,但他认为必须慎防陷入“津贴国”的潜在危险。 他认为,英国在70多年前推行福利国制度时,无法预料到今天会承受的巨大负担。“这种制度的根本风险在于–现在看起来对的事情,将来可能出错。” 他说,随着国家的需求、挑战和特征会改变,我们无法预知几代人过后,津贴国会面对怎样的潜在负担。 故此, 他认为必须在政府的责任、社区、家庭和个人之间取得平衡,确保新加坡能持续发展、进步。 换言之,或许新加坡为了避免陷入“福利国”陷阱,反倒成为“津贴国”,一方面国人继续承受各种生活压力,一方面政府则必须这里津贴一点,那里发一些填补,使得整个系统更为繁琐、复杂化,这反倒增加行政上的成本和负担,许多民众也感到混淆,去问问看有多少年长者,究竟能分辨出立国一代配套和建国一代的差别? 医疗乃基本人权 之前,工人党秘书长毕丹星在参与国会辩论时,就曾呼吁落实永久性的乐龄医疗护理配套,让国人只要年满60岁,就能自动享有一系列的基本医疗津贴。 这并不是要我国成为“福利国”,而是保障国人最基本的医疗保健权利,让他们免于无法看病、看不起病的忧虑。如果真得体恤国民,珍惜年长者对国家的牺牲和奉献,那么就应该把看病视作人民的基本权益。 过去,曾有报导指一名年长者因感到无法排尿,到陈笃生医院急诊部门求助。但他申诉,医院职员不让他使用建国一代卡,结果他还要为看诊付105元的费用。 这事件发生在2015年,当时的卫生部的答复是这样的:建国一代卡可用在CHAS社保计划诊所、综合诊所和医院专科门诊,但不包括急诊部门。 这是因为,公共医院急诊部门为紧急意外伤患、有生命危险者服务,为确保病人得到所需紧急治疗,所以急诊部的手费都是划一的。…