Chua Soon Hock /


Despite a number of cooling measures from the government in the past year, the Singapore property market continues to be strong, hitting all-time high in prices. A recent prime condo traded at new record high of $5,842psf.

This resilience is/was due to both domestic and global factors:
1. Bullish contradictions in economic and social policies in the form of very aggressive immigration policy, the more liberal approach to PR purchasing GCBs and prime properties in Sentosa, the relative slow increase in supply especially in HDB public housing and the mark up of prices in new HDB flats. These domestic factors provided strong underlying support and the base to the uptrend in property prices across the board.

2. Global inflation from aggressive monetary policy by central banks led by the US Fed and China resulting in capital flows into commodities and other hard assets including properties. Singapore with its open economy inevitably becomes a recipient of these fluid global flows, part of which find its way into the local property market.

3. The huge phenomenal increase in the number of Asian high net worth individuals especially from China and India, who look to diversify their risk and investments through private banking centres like Singapore and Hongkong, thereby parking some of their funds in local properties.

Given the landmark political election in Singapore, it is highly likely that the domestic bullish contradictions in economic and social policies will be addressed. Aggressive immigration will likely be much moderated, a more stringent approach towards foreigners and PR purchasing properties may be
considered and HDB public housing pricing policies toward better affordability for Singaporeans will be addressed to help its citizens cope with high costs of living. These likely forthcoming measures will have dampening effects on local property prices.

However, the global factors will continue to be very bullish and mitigate the bearish effects until such time when the US Fed decides to reverse its extremely loose monetary policy.

It may be instructional for policy makers and Singaporeans to study the history of the formation of the huge and long Japanese property bubble, its burst (20 years and still going on) and its after effects and learn a few lessons:

1. Big property bubbles do not benefit citizens in the long run, instead they may be harmful. While the party of paper wealth creation is ongoing, things all look very good but they are hollow and superficial. A relative massive wealth distribution is part of the many problems (eg low productivity), where a few savvy players gained much when the game is over with many others having purchased at or near the peak and an indebted generation suffering serious financial consequences subsequently.

2. The bigger and longer the bubble, more likely the bigger and the longer the
burst.

3. The peak of the bubble will usually coincide with high costs of living, high economic growth, with the timing being near the peak of the total population with insane valuations.

If Singapore’s peak population is 6.5 million, then maybe we may want to consider stretching the time to reach this peak as long as possible (over 30 to 50 years) to sustain gradual positive economic and social development for its citizens. More haste, more mistakes. May I also add more aggression likely more volatility.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

《亚洲周刊》刊专题 质问何时恢复陈六使公民权

1963年9月23日,东南亚第一所华文大学南洋大学的创校人陈六使,被指控“与共产党份子合作”,被剥夺公民权。直到1972年老人家离逝,都未能获平反。 今年第48期(2020/11/30-12/6)的《亚洲周刊》刊载封面专题–《南洋大学等待平反   创办人陈六使公民权何时恢复?》,重访当年轰轰烈烈的教育抗争路,亦无疑向当今新加坡执政领袖抛出问题,如何重新看待南大课题。 2019年10月,南洋理工大学把校园内原名南洋谷的道路,易名“陈六使径”,肯定陈六使对教育的贡献。时任教育部长王乙康还主持揭牌仪式。“陈六使径”的设立也引发联想,许多校友和东南亚华人,都希望南大和陈六使获得平反。 “然而官方对此举完全不谈陈六使名誉是否恢复的问题,还有一些人议论的是,以陈六使对南大与华社的贡献之巨与气魄之大,路名却仅仅是一个微不足道的‘Walk’,既不匹配也显得小器。” 1953年,陈六使倡议创办以华文为主的大学,并率先捐出五百万新元。登高一呼,立马获得华人社会响应,“新马各界泉涌而来的捐献,涓滴成河海,尤其是新加坡本地,除了商家,无数市井小民、三轮车夫、舞女、小贩、洗衣妇,都为了一所完全属于民间的华文大学,默默献出自己的劳力和血汗,换成微不足道的捐款。” 《亚洲周刊》的文章提及,后来陈六使与英殖民者及已故李光耀的矛盾被政治化、甚至被视为眼中钉,结果被扣上“曾经积极与反国家共党分子合作”、对“南大在治安上成为马来亚之严重问题应负其责”为由,剥夺了陈六使的公民权。 南洋大学在一1956年正式开课,到1980年举行第21届毕业典礼为止,共培养毕业生约1万2千人,校友包括新加坡执政党政治人物蔡崇语、何家良、庄日坤、柯新治、陈原生、流亡政治人物谢太宝、何元泰、邓亮洪、反对派政治人物刘程强、艺术家陈瑞献、著名作家尤今、资深媒体人林任君、杜南发、潘正镭、澳洲历史学者杨进发、大马前内阁部长刘贤镇、企业家与社团领袖林源德、颜清文、历史学者李业霖、资深媒体人谢诗坚、评论人李万千、香港学者郑赤琰、财经专家曾渊沧、印尼出生的学者廖建裕等,都是南大校友。南大毕业生不像以英文为主流的新加坡大学毕业生,容易进入公务员体系或与官方相关的大企业,很多人在私人企业界闯荡或出洋深造,不少人成就斐然。 当年办校盛况今竟不复记忆 1958年3月30日南大落成典礼更是空前盛况,“前往校园的一条裕廊路塞车长达16公里,出席主宾总督顾德爵士,都为此迟到两个多小时”。 然而文章也感叹,短短两代人对当年那个缔造离逝的盛况,竟然不复记忆,甚至不愿提起。 其中一个原因,是李光耀在世前后的执政者,都不愿去面对它,在野党领袖也不敢、不便或不屑去提起它。李光耀在回忆录里试图隐晦自己在南大关闭事件中的角色,将倡导关闭南大的责任,归属于南大毕业的几名内阁成员。…

Barbra Streisand praises PM Lee for having “common sense” in handling COVID-19

Hollywood movie star Barbra Streisand posted a message on Twitter yesterday (30…

SDP’s Chee Soon Juan champions the conservation of the Bukit Batok Hillside Park; outlines concerns of redevelopment

Continuing to question various development projects in Bukit Batok, Singapore Democratic Party…

MPs to question Parliament on Electoral Boundaries Review Committee

By Ariffin Sha When Parliament sits again on 13 July, two Members…