Andrew Loh /

The General Elections have resulted in what PM Lee called “epochal” changes to the Cabinet. We have seen 2 Senior Ministers, the Minister Mentor, and 6 other ministers stepping down from the Cabinet.

The GE also saw historic achievements by the opposition parties which collectively brought the PAP’s vote share to its lowest since Independence. The Workers’ Party managed to do what many had thought unthinkable – breaking through the iron wall of the GRC system. The WP now has 8 MPs in the new Parliament. Mrs Chiam from the Singapore People’s Party is the 9th opposition MP.

PM Lee has said he wants to listen to the people. So did other ministers. While skeptics and critics of the PAP government were quick to question the PAP’s sincerity, it would perhaps be more important and productive to see how we as citizens can hold the PAP, and PM Lee in particular, to their words.

After all, citizens too have a responsibility and a role to play in effecting the changes that they want to see.

Yes, reform, renewal and change are not new ideas or goals the PAP is offering. Throughout the years, these have been constant promises. One of the most memorable instances was after the 2001 GE where the so-called “Super Seven” newly-elected MPs were inducted into the PAP and made ministers. Some of them have, in some people’s eyes, failed – such as Raymond Lim who has stepped down as Transport Minister and from the Cabinet, and MCYS’s Vivian Balakrishnan who has now been posted to the Ministry of Environment and Water Resources.

But others have performed credibly, most notable of which is Tharman Shanmugaratnam who now is given several meaty and heavy portfolios.

But a switching of personnel does not equate to reform, as some have said. This is true. But one should not expect reform or policy changes to take place immediately. More probably these will take time and this is how it should be. After all, we want the changes to result in better policies, not worse ones. And to do this will take time.

Where citizens can do their part is to keep highlighting the flaws and failings of government policies. But to do this in a meaningful way, leaving aside the diatribes and personal smears for these do not achieve anything.

The elections have ended and we as Singaporeans should see the road ahead and realise that we are all traveling on the same road, trying to get to the same destination. Along the way, we argue and, to use Low Thia Khiang’s analogy, we may even “slap” the driver. But, and I am sure this is what Mr Low meant and he will agree with me, we “slap” the driver because we do not want him to drive us off course and into a ravine.

In other words, we want the best for Singapore and our fellow Singaporeans.

The Cabinet changes are a positive outcome of the elections, and the new Parliament holds promise.

As citizens, we are not outside of the arena. We are an integral part of it. And as such, we should take this opportunity to put forth our views, our worries and concerns, our hopes and expectations, to the government – and do so with respect, especially when we disagree vehemently with the government.

So yes, it is time to go beyond just compllaining and step up and help drive Singapore forward.

The job does not belong to just a select few.

There are various ways to go about being involved, which I shall leave for everyone to highlight and to discuss.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

循环公司斥资1亿4400万元 防塑料污染海洋基金会成立

为能清理亚洲海洋塑料的危机,循环资本投资公司将斥资1亿零600万美元(约1亿4400万新元)防止塑料污染从亚洲流入海洋。 循环资本投资公司昨日(4日)发表文告,表示成立“循环资本海洋基金会”(Circulate Capital Ocean Fund),也是首个致力于应对亚洲塑料海洋危机的投资基金。其中包括可口可乐公司、百事可乐、宝洁公司与石化公司雪佛龙飞利浦公司,将在明年第一季开始资助预防及控制塑料污染的中小企业。 其中八个投资基金的国际公司,包括连续两年全球生产最多塑料的可口可乐跨国集团,各个公司投入约1500万美元(约2046万新元)。 据了解,目前全球海洋共有1500万吨塑料垃圾,每年还会增加800万吨。其中的六成源自亚洲包括中国、印尼、菲律宾、泰国和越南,他们均缺乏相关资金对塑料垃圾的处理进行研究。 因此,循环资本基金会旨在为废物管理公司投资,为他们筹备资金,解决塑料海洋的问题。 循环经济是一个具有可持续性营运模式的经济概念,比如投资在废塑料管理这个领域不只对环境有益,赚取的盈利也足以注入回该领域。 金管局首席执行官兼循环资本总裁柯普朗(Rob Kaplan)透露,在各国之间,塑料垃圾的收集成本差距在每吨28美元至40美元,而基金会的成立能够填补资金缺口。 他表示,“我们相信资金的支持下我们至少能够减少五成的塑料泄漏的问题,若将资金投资在科技的提升,我们或许能够减少更多。”…

涉嫌焚烧国旗男子今面控

一名男子于兀兰组屋焚烧我国国旗,涉嫌作出侮辱我国国旗行为,警方昨日(7日)以恶作剧纵火罪将嫌犯逮捕,今日被提控。 警方周三(7日)发文告指出,他们于周一(4日)中午12点40分接获通报,指在兀兰第774座组屋发现遭烧毁的国旗,警方经调查及翻阅闭路电视监控后,锁定一名25岁男子,于昨日将他逮捕归案。 警方续指,该名嫌犯目前已被控上法庭,并相信涉及其他兀兰焚烧案件。一旦罪成,或将面临最高7年监禁及罚款。 回溯2018年,也有一名63岁患有精神分裂男子,因焚烧国旗被判入狱半年。 至于本周一,也出现另一起和国旗有关的案件,不过是有人在蔡厝港组屋张挂中华人民共和国旗帜,但目前已被撤下,警方介入调查。 根据《国徽(显示管制)法》规定,公共场合展示任何非新加坡国旗或国徽者,均属违法行为。一旦公众在任何地点可看见有关国旗/国徽,将被视为是公开展示。犯罪者或将面临最高6个月监禁或500新元罚款,或两者兼施。  

为五月和六月作准备? 选举局:承包商自行选择选举筹备工作

日前,本社报导近期求职网站出现招聘“活动助理”的启事,求职条件之一为“五月到六月间”可被安排到各处地点。有相关参与培训课程的求职者也反映,有关职缺旨在提供选举的物流支援。 负责培训的公司是新科综合服务(ST Synthesis)。尽管本社曾针对此事质询选举局,惟后者则已接受《联合早报》质询并作出答复。有关报导则指,作为承包商,ST Synthesis是自行选择开始为选举筹备。 选举局称,ST Synthesis自行开始它每个季度的筹备工作,包括招聘与培训临时工。此举乃是为了履行承包合约的要求,并在大选随时启动时,都能做好准备。 选举局也指不会干涉上述承包商如何履行合约需求。 根据政府招标记录,有关承包商曾在2015年,为选举局提供选举物流支援和仓储服务长达六年。 本社也曾询问选举局,上述承包商要求求职者需在五月和六月作准备,为此选举局是否也在那段期间作相应筹备?惟后者未给予回应。

Lawyer M Ravi: Section 35 of CPC does not empower the police to seize note book

Human Rights Lawyer, Mr M Ravi has delivered a letter to the…