Elaine Ong /

To the skeptical, the opposition MPs’ attempts at walking the ground after GE2011 might seem like a case of new brooms sweeping clean. Whether it is the case or not, all I can say is that the people in Aljunied have been very touched to see their new MPs walking the ground even after the elections.

It is one thing to see them going door to door harnessing votes before the elections, it’s quite another to see them on an MRT train, withdrawing money from an ATM, drinking coffee at the kopitiam etc.

To the people on the ground (ordinary folks like you and me), the smile, the handshake, the effort made at striking up a conversation do not go unnoticed.

I did not want to write about this prior to the elections because I did not want what I am writing to be seen in the wrong light, as being anti-PAP because honestly I am not.

Frankly speaking, while George Yeo was an efficient and likeable MP, unfortunately, we never saw or knew much about him except for the fact that he was the Foreign Minister and that he was constantly surrounded by grassroots members who did all the talking for him.

One incident remains clear in my mind. It was after the 2006 elections.

Mr Yeo made a visit to the block (with the usual official fanfare that accompany the visit of any PAP member). Part of the car park was cordoned off and a large number of grassroots leaders was hovering around at the void deck. My then six-year old, seeing the commotion, was quite expecting to see a limousine pull up. That is the ceremonious fanfare that typically accompany the visit of the so-called government official.

That evening unfortunately, not many residents were home (it being a Friday). It was a rather inconvenient time for my family when the doorbell rang and we were quite reluctant to open it. When we did, a grassroots member practically pleaded with us to welcome the arriving minister since, according to his words, the minister had knocked unsuccessfully on several doors only to find that nobody was in.

I thought this would be the perfect opportunity to ask about my lift upgrading programme (LUP).

To my surprise, the grassroots leader told me Mr Yeo would not be answering my questions on the LUP but would be addressing this question at his meet-the-people session (MPS) on another night the next week.

When Mr Yeo did turn up five minutes later, it was a hasty visit. A few words exchanged and a perfunctory handshake and smile. The impression I got rightly or wrongly was that it was not the place and time to ask anything regarding my neighbourhood. (I still quite regret having listened to the grassroots leader and not asking Mr Yeo my questions….then again my family was right in the middle of dinner).

Anyway, what I am trying to say is that these things, the attitude of the grassroots leader, was especially annoying. There was always this barrier between the ones above, and the mere mortals like me below. Hardly what I would call engagement. Surely the MPS is not the only place for questions. Anyway the incident left a poor impression on me.

All I can say is sometimes the little things in life do matter to the average man on the street. We can do away with all the pompousness and fanfare. I still do not understand why till this day PAP MPs need such huge gathering of grassroots leaders to pave the way for the MPs’ visits. If it is to impress upon the ordinary folks the importance of their visits, then I for one am clearly not impressed.

The people in the middle and upper echelons of government should take a leaf out of Chen Show Mao’s book. Visit his Facebook page and you will know what I mean.

The little things do matter and it has got nothing to do with money and upgrading.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

探讨异议课程遭耶鲁-国大学院腰斩 亚菲言:异议就是说不的艺术

“如果我们就连腾出空间去倾听那些说不的人,也做不到,那么民主已死。” 据报导,耶鲁—国大学院临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程。有关课程将由新加坡知名剧作家亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at),与参与学生探讨本土的公民抗命模式。 有关课程原本计划在本月27日至10月5日进行,结果在开课前两周就被喊停。耶鲁—国大学院校长陈大荣教授,则在受询时向媒体解释,课程“未批判性地接触多元观点,这对于探讨围绕在异议周边的政治、社会和伦理议题,去做作妥当的学术检视是需要的”。 他续指,有关课程建议的活动和选取的讲员,也有损该校不把政党政治利益带入校园的承诺。 他也指出一些活动建议包括“可能使学生面临违法风险、或面对法律责任的元素”。 课程原本由本地剧作家亚菲言和课程经理Tan Yock Theng负责。 亚菲言对于本地时政课题向来有话直说,他著作的诗歌、剧作和短片等,也常触碰诸如政治、性别和族群等议题。 课程活动之一,包括观看独立制片人苏德祥制作“光谱行动”纪录片《1987解开阴谋》(1987: Untracing…

在台受伤国民服役人员 初步调查:固定拉绳没拉紧,颈部被打伤

日前,一名全职国民服役人员在台湾进行一项跳伞训练,不幸遭受颈椎受伤。初步调查显示,连接飞机和降落伞的固定拉绳没拉紧,指示伤者颈部被固定拉绳打伤,惟具体原因有待进一步调查。 国防部长黄永宏医生于昨日(6日)国会中回答毕丹星的有关国民服役人员于台湾训练时受伤的提问,表示新加坡武装部队,每年都会进行约6000次的固定拉绳式跳伞,而约两万7千名学员已从训练课程中毕业。 然而,此次意外是目前为止,首起因固定拉绳式跳伞训练而出现严重受伤的案例。 固定拉绳(static line)式跳伞训练是基本空降课程的一部分,受训学员的降落伞由一条拉绳连接到飞机上,学员跳出飞机时绳子就会拉紧,降落伞也会自动打开。 据悉,案发当天,21岁的郭守杰在进行第五次,亦是最后一次的跳伞训练。事前更完成了跳前资格、演习训练及安全简报等课程。 黄永宏解释,固定拉绳式跳伞在过程中,一旦出现拉绳太松,就有可能造成上述所说的已知风险,而郭守杰是在跳伞过程中出现颈伤,但仍顺利在指定降落区域落地,当时在他落地后立即又医务人员替他处理伤势再将他送往离事发地点最近的医院接受治疗。 “目前正在进行详细的调查,以确定发生意外的具体原因是否涉及在跳伞期间给予足够的监督”,黄永宏表示。 截至目前,郭守杰已接受了两次手术,已逐步恢复局部活动机能,意识清醒并能够与亲人对话。虽然已经恢复意识,但他还需继续接受长时间复健和物理治疗。 黄永宏表示,他目前虽然情况稳定,但在未来几周内仍需要密切监测,当医生认为他能够安全搭乘飞机时,即可带回新加坡接受治疗。 此外,目前已暂停所有固定拉绳式跳伞训练,待实质建议提出并落实后才得以恢复。 黄永宏说,“调查委员会会全面查清意外的详细情况及可能造成的因素,并会严格检视所有安全程序集安全人员是否有遵守安全守则,再针对情况提出实质的建议与改善。”

Facebook user’s act of kindness sparks a wave of emotions

Facebook user Claris Ortega shared an experienced she had at the Clementi…

Three women got into a catfight at an Australian supermarket over toilet paper

Three women have been filmed fighting at an Australian supermarket over a pack…