Deborah Choo/

Mdm Choi Lim Siew, 65, was diagnosed in 2009 with a rare blood cancer called multiple myeloma.  All the doctors she went to were perplexed over her condition and did not know how to treat her. It took almost nine months of going from polyclinic doctors to bone specialists to a blood specialist before they realized an abnormality in her blood count. Further tests then confirmed she had blood cancer. By then it was too late. Mdm Choi was already in the last stage of myeloma.

Singapore General Hospital is where Mdm Choi receives her cancer treatment now.

The hospital bills and consultation fees, especially for specialist doctors and medical reports, exhausted her savings. Unfortunately, that was only the beginning. There is no cure for her condition, and the treatments she is going through now only serve to prolong her life.

Mdm Choi has thought of giving up because the heavy medical bills were too much to bear. “I told the doctor frankly to give me the worst possible scenario if I stop treatment. He said the bones will all start to crack, I will feel pain and at most I have six months more to live,” she said.

She was told that cancer treatments are not subsidized by the government and that she was also unable to use her Medisave. After much haggling with the authorities , and with her doctor’s help, she was later allowed to tap into her Medisave which had about $29,000 then. But this was drained rapidly by the costs of the pills (about S$500 per pill) and the chemotherapy sessions (S$1,000 per treatment).

“My medicine is so expensive that the nurse doesn’t even dare to open it for me to partake. She will pass it to me to open it myself,” she said.

Mdm Choi is now tapping into her son’s Medisave account to pay for her treatment.  On the day we first met her, she had just been out of hospital for a round of chemotherapy. This was her third course of treatment and had cost about $7,000. As Medisave has a cap limit per day of $450, she could not afford to pay the entire bill. She now has about $5,000 outstanding which she needs to pay for. She has to complete another three more courses, which translates into approximately $21,000  in costs.

“I really don’t know where to find the money,” Mdm Choi said. But more importantly, she asked, “Why are cancer treatments not subsidized by the government?”

According to the Ministry of Health statistics, diseases such as cancer, ischaemic heart disease and pneumonia together accounted for approximnately 60% of the total causes of death in 2009 alone.

About three weeks ago, she sent in an appeal for financial assistance to the Singapore Leukemia Foundation. She is currently awaiting the foundation’s reply.

Here are her recent five pages medical bill (this is republished with Mdm Choi’s consent):

page 1
page 2
page 3
page 4
page 5

 

During the same period in 2009, Mdm Choi’s husband Mr Cheong had a fall at home one day. He was then rushed to the hospital and told that he had to undergo surgery. He is 73.

Mr Cheong had a heart attack in his early thirties and has had to be on medication since.

When he asked the hospital for an estimate of the cost of the surgery, he was told that it would only cost him about $5,000. Thinking that he could tap into his Medisave (since he was ineligible for Medishield due to his heart condition), he went ahead with the operation. He had about $26,000 in his Medisave account. After the surgery, however, the bills came up to $31,000. The final bill, after subsidies, was $12,000. He was then told that he cannot use his Medisave to pay the bills.  “We almost died when we saw the bill,” said Mdm Choi.

In November 2009, he appealed twice to his MP Dr Lily Neo. “She saw my folder of bills and said I was already given subsidies,” he said. The meeting lasted only 15 minutes before Dr Neo said she will send a letter to the Central Provident Funds (CPF) board and the Singapore General Hospital (SGH).

 

*Note: Personal details are omitted to protect the interviewee's privacy.

On 15 December 2009 came a reply from the CPF board. The letter said, “We regret that we are unable to accede to your request to use more Medisave to pay your outstanding hospital bill at SGH as the maximum has already been withdrawn…If you have difficulties in settling your hospitalization expenses, you may wish to approach SGH Business Office …  for consideration of financial assistance or to work out an affordable payment plan.”

Slightly more than a month ago, Mr Cheong applied for financial assistance at SGH. Instead he was referred to the Medical Social Services of the National Heart Centre.

During this period, demand for payment of his bills were frequently received from a credit collection company on behalf of SGH.

“They’re like a licensed loan shark,” Mdm Choi chipped in. Mr Cheong kept holding them off by telling them he is currently appealing to his MP.

He turned to his insurance company but his claims were rejected.

Lucky for Mr Cheong, his ex-boss (he used to work in Public Utilities Board for 44 years),  who was also an ex-MP, learnt of his condition. He then made a personal call to Dr Neo after Chinese New Year in 2010 on behalf of Mr Cheong. That was when things started improving. Soon after, he received a letter from the CPF allowing him to pay off half his bills through his Medisave. At the same time, SGH also sent him a letter authorizing him to pay off his remaining payment with 23 installments of about $400 a month. “I only receive $300 a month from annuity! How am I supposed to pay $400? I don’t need to eat already,” Mr Cheong said.

He repeatedly appealed to SGH again and finally the hospital relented. It allowed him to pay $150 a month for 29 installments, which means he will have to keep paying until 2013.

Four months ago, Mr Cheong had another fall and was advised by his doctor to go for another surgery. However, he refused as he cannot afford the costs given his current predicament. He can hardly survive on the little money he has now. All he can do for now is to go for regular check-ups.

Mr Cheong also suffers from diabetes, high blood pressure and has a deteriorating eye condition. “Every week, it’s like I have to go for at least one check up,” he said.

Mdm Choi has also previously written in to The Straits Times explaining their predicament but her letter was not published.

Mr Cheong asked, “Why can’t I use Medisave when it’s my own money?”

“We’re not blaming the government for anything. We just want to get our answers,” Mdm Choisaid. 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Indonesia’s healthcare system unable to cope with the COVID-19 outbreak

Indonesia faces a significant lack of hospital beds, medical staff and intensive…

Singaporean express disappointment over how PAP consistently selects its own members to run for president

Ishhaq Rajoo Jay, a life coach and fitness guru, shares his disappointment on social media over Senior Minister Tharman’s presidential run. He criticizes the PAP’s recurring pattern of nominating their own members, arguing that the presidency should serve as a counterbalance to the ruling party. Ishhaq fears that Tharman’s accomplishments could be overshadowed if he becomes a ‘puppet president’, urging him to remain true to his stellar reputation and not be swayed by political machinations.

退休银行家献议 长期投资回报预估交国会审批

一名退休银行家今日在个人脸书发表建议,淡马锡控股、政府投资公司(GIC)和金融管理局(MAS)的长期投资预估多少、决策政府可以动用多少储备,不妨交给国会来商讨和批准。 昨日(本月8日),新加坡总统哈莉玛,与总统顾问理事会成员,聆听副总理暨财政部长王瑞杰,向她汇报本届政府对于相关资产投资的长期实得回报推算。 哈莉玛解释在准备年度财政预算案上,这个环节十分重要,他们将审视有关回报预估,在国家储备净投资回报收益(NIR)框架下,预估回报用来决定政府可以动用多少储备。 与会者还包括金管局、政府投资公司以及淡马锡控股的代表。哈莉玛指出,她将在总统顾问理事会咨询下,检视政府的提案。 至于退休银行家Chris Kuan则点评,上述三家机构提出他们的观点支持有关储备金的财政规则,这并无不妥。但也提出,总统不一定是投资专家,这种情况下总统要如何提出不同观点、乃至挑战三家机构提出的回报假设? 他认为,现有机制理应能做得更好,目前基于投资策略问题,则显得有欠透明;他献议交给国会讨论,包括投资授权、增加股权等,都能在国会批准,而总统则回归到象征性的批准提案。 至于民选议员和一般民众,至少能获得知情权,在讨论过程中才对国家储备金怎么用,才有一定的了解。他也补充,即便挪威人在管理储备金上也是这么做的,藉此增加民众的信任和支持。也可以减少因为信息误解,导致必须动用《防假消息法》的窘况。

新加坡经济高度依赖廉价劳工 区伟鹏吁直面根本问题

客工亦重(Transient Workers Count Too)副主席区伟鹏认为,新加坡经济模式依赖廉价劳工来确保繁荣进步,我们透过低薪和减低成本来维持“廉价”,而其中一种方法,就是把客工塞进客工宿舍。 在本月1日,本地非政府组织“尊严”(MARUAH)举办“五一国际劳动节”网络讲座,探讨劳工和本地客工议题,近期客工宿舍确诊病例激增,冠状病毒19 疫情对这个群体的冲击也受到关注。 “客工亦重”早在3月23日,就已警告一些工友住在一间容纳12至20人的房间、去上班也是肩并肩挤罗厘,都不符合社交安全距离,遗憾的是,客工宿舍仍出现大爆发现象。 区伟鹏指出,透过支付低薪和减低成本,我们让这些客工继续“保持廉价”,其中一种方法就是把他们挤进宿舍。 人力部长杨莉明早前在《联合早报》访谈,表示疫情稳定后,政府需全面检讨客工待遇和住宿条件。 需直面高度依赖廉价劳动力的事实 区伟鹏认可部长作出反思,不过他也指出,如果我们仍不去深入质疑,新加坡经济高度依赖廉价劳动力的脆弱面,那么进步空间不大。他认为从此次疫情中,我们更需要直面根本的问题,客工群体当中仍有许多“计时炸弹”的议题待解决。 他也指出,客工宿舍都还不是最主要的问题,他整理疫情前,投诉或求助客工所反映的问题,包括薪资、过高的代理费用等,较少提及宿舍的问题。当然这不代表他们对宿舍感到满意,当被主动询及对宿舍的看法是,也是有赞有弹。…