Yvonne Leng /

I had gone to a polyclinic in mid-February and requested to do a MRI scan for my chronic backache which gave me agonizing pain and was affecting my sleep and temperament. I was first given a slot in early April to see the orthopaedic doctor. I asked for the earliest slot possible and was told that was the earliest date. I had managed my expectations well, knowing it would take 2-3 months before I can see the doctor. So I waited.

Come March, I was notified that my appointment had been postponed to almost another 2 months later, from early April to end of May instead. I wasn’t given any explanation; just a SMS and a letter that they “regret” to inform me that my appointment had been rescheduled.

I decided to do the scan at a private hospital and got a slot the very next day. Results were out the following day too. This kind of efficiency costs me S$1,000 excluding the treatment sessions averaging about S$100 per half an hour. I too accepted it, because it was a non-subsidised hospital.

6th May 2011, one day before election, I received a sms from CGH that my orthopaedic surgery appointment @ Changi General Hospital (CGH) had been once again delayed – for a second time. This time round delayed another 3 months from the already delayed date – end of August.

More than 6 months to see the doctor, just to do a scan? This is ridiculous, unacceptable and simply insane. I do not actually need to see the doctor anymore, but I am really mad.

I called the hospital and demanded an explanation. I was really really mad. And to my surprise, the operations manager reverted back to me within 3 hours and offered me an appointment slot that was just a few days later.

I was very impressed with her professionalism and efficiency. But somehow this made me even more angry. If I were one of the poor, uneducated, non-complaining Singaporeans or one who does not know which channel to go for help, I would have to accept these delays in seeking medical treatment? Is it because my condition is not life threatening that I have to accept this kind of unprofessionalism and inefficiency? Or are the poor and weak supposed to have higher threshold for pain and their lives are not as worthy as the rich?

I have since written to Ministry of Health and the Straits Times forum page. I have yet to hear from them. I am very sure a lot of people are facing the same problem. And as a fellow Singaporean, (not trying to be label as a typical complaining Singaporean) I think I have to voice out and make attempts to rectify issues like this.

And convey the message that our healthcare system has a lot of room to improve on. I sincerely hope Ms Tin Pei Ling and Mr Khaw Boon Wan – both of whom espoused the affordability and efficiency of our healthcare system – will be able to read this and make sure what needs to be rectified will be rectified.

—————–

Picture from the History Society.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SDP granted leave to appeal on correction direction issued under POFMA

The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) was granted leave on Wednesday (26 Feb)…

已故纳吉亲信婆媳争遗产 揭生前拥7亿新元身家

根据马国《当今大马》报导,该国已故前部长丹斯里贾玛鲁丁母亲,向伊斯兰高庭入禀申索儿子遗产,媒体才从而得知,其子财产价值超过21亿令吉(约七亿新元)。 贾玛鲁丁生前任科学工艺部长,也是彭亨云冰区国会议员,不幸在2015年在直升机坠毁事故中丧生。他也被视为前首相纳吉的亲信。 其84岁母亲阿米娜是在今年3月2日,根据1993年伊斯兰行政法律(联邦直辖区)第46(ix)条文下,入禀有关申请。 阿米娜代表律师卡玛埃尼亚指出,贾玛鲁丁也是马国驻美大使,在马来西亚、美国和麦加拥有20个房产和公司。 其中有20亿令吉乃是15家公司股权、其余则包括22项房地产、21个共存有1千500万令吉的银行账户。 根据诉状,贾玛鲁丁在美国拥有一间公寓,在麦加则有一间价值约132万新元的公寓。其余国内资产,则分布在马国彭亨州、霹雳、吉隆坡、薛澜儿、布城和柔佛,其中两项房产个别价值都超过661万新元。 他在纳吉选区北根(Pekan)拥有九栋房屋,在其生前选区云冰则坐拥四栋房屋以及在彭亨关丹的两间房屋。 阿米娜是与贾玛鲁丁遗孀潘斯里卡尔森和四名子女分配遗产。他要求法庭将波士顿的公寓和部分麦加皇家钟楼费尔蒙大厦(Fairmont Makkah)房产下判给他。 根据伊斯兰法,如果死者没立遗嘱,他的母亲可得死者遗产六分之一,而遗孀获得八分之一,子女则获其余遗产。阿米娜则向法庭申请继承五分之一遗产。 贾玛鲁丁生前自1990年开始就担任云冰国会议员,他是在2015年4月4日,在北根出席了纳吉女儿婚宴后,乘搭直升机返回雪兰莪时,不幸遭遇空难,与纳吉机要秘书阿兹林等五名乘客全部罹难。 马国《星报》有关贾玛鲁丁遭遇空难的新闻视频。…

敦马:检讨官委CEO高薪 “有表现才奖掖”

马来西亚首相敦马哈迪,计划将那些领高薪、但缺乏表现的政府机构和官联公司的高阶领导换下来,选贤任能,委任真正专业人士管理。 “他们支持国阵成员党,所以才被委任,而不是依据他们的财经管理能力。他们的表现平平,却能领取高薪,我们发现他们手上有些计划失败了,或者无法获利。” 他强调,新政府将委任真正的专业人士来担任这些机构的首席执行员或董事,而且不会支付太高的薪水。如果表现良好,则改以花红作为奖励。 “我们(希盟政府)物色专业人士,优先考虑有管理经验者。”但他强调,一旦发现涉及贪污和舞弊,即使是希盟政府部长,也会立即被革职。 他估计,有1万7千名高管乃前朝国阵政府委任,当中还包括缺乏绩效的外交大使。敦马是在日前拜访印尼雅加达,在记者招待会上回答记者提问。 马官企吹离职风 续国阵政府在今年5月的大选败选,已有许多官联机构高管相继离职。希盟政府上台后,更大刀阔斧改革臃肿和功能重叠的政府机构。 在近期,国民投资公司(PNB)主席丹斯里阿都华希已主动请辞,由前国家银行总裁丹斯里洁蒂接任。5月14日,前新山区国会议员丹斯里沙里尔,也自动辞去联邦土地发展局 主席一职。该局负责全马垦殖区的发展和投资。至于朝圣基金局主席拿督斯里阿都阿兹,也在5月24日请辞。 财政部秘书长丹斯里伊尔旺博士的合约也被终止,并被转任到公共服务部。他也辞去财政部旗下公司的董事职位。任期还未满的国家银行行长丹斯里莫哈末伊布拉欣,也步其后尘。他是在2016年5月接替洁蒂。 这股离职潮还波及马电讯首席执行员,丹斯里沙查里在上月6日宣布离职;知名吉隆坡中环车站发展商、马资源(MRCB)董事经理丹斯里莫哈末沙林从7月2日起正式离职。 国油主席丹斯里莫哈末西迪哈山在上周在总部受到职员“欢送”;国油独立非执行总监拿督莫哈末奥马也早在上月初呈辞。马交易所首席执行员拿督斯里塔祖丁相信在其明年3月合约期满前,将被撤换。…

毕丹星吁免除部队部分免责权 黄永宏:问责制一直都在

阿裕尼集选区议员、工人党秘书长毕丹星建议政府可废除部分军队免责权,指挥官一旦行动鲁莽、恶意行事或故意忽视安全,就不能受免责条文的保护。 工人党非选区议员陈立峰也提出相同提议。不过,国防部长黄永宏则认为,废除军队免责保护可能对军人构成名誉风险,致使他们不敢承担责任,进而影响军队的作战效率。 政府诉讼法令第14节条文赋免责权 根据政府诉讼法令(Government Proceedings Act)第14节条文规定,武装部队人员在执勤时,若导致另一部队成员伤亡,该人员和政府都豁免被民事诉讼追究。 针对近期频发的国民服役人员事故事件,黄永宏昨日在国会透露有关战备军人冯伟衷在维修自走炮时发生事故的部分细节,以及针对去年11月在军训时被后退步兵战车撞死的刘凯,公布独立调查委员会调查结果。 黄永宏针对毕丹星的建议强调问责制度一直都在,对于失误负责的指挥官或战备军人,他们可不是面对民事赔偿,他们会被判入狱服刑,也意味着他们的职业生涯就毁了,他们得到应有的惩罚。 黄永宏强调,他担心的不是国防部的声誉,而更关注指挥官有没有能力在监督和带领士兵安全执行军训。过去也有指挥官面对刑事指控,受到应有惩罚。 但毕丹星也认为,政府有必要对部队施以更大的问责,此举乃是重构公众对国民服役的信心。 “零伤亡”目标不实际 他说,政府可列出不得豁免被起诉的情况,然后交由法庭决定国防部或涉案的指挥官是否须对事故负责。…