Press Statement by George Yeo on 10 May 2011 at MFA

Thank you for waiting a couple of days for me to rest before meeting you.

I would like to make some remarks before taking questions.

Aljunied voters have decided and I respect their decision. Having committed 23 years of service to the residents, it is only natural for me to feel disappointed but this is politics.

It has been my privilege to have served them all these years and they have enriched my life.  They have also enabled me to serve in various capacities as a Cabinet Minister in MITA, Health, MTI and MFA for which I am grateful.

Why did we lose Aljunied?

Mr Low Thia Kiang himself said that they won Aljunied not because the Aljunied team did not do a good job, but because the voters wanted WP to be their voice in Parliament.

Mr Low’s analysis is fair and I agree with him. This desire for a strong WP voice in Parliament was a political tide which came in through Aljunied which we were unable to withstand despite our very best efforts.  Right from the start, the Workers Party made Aljunied a national battleground.

The fight became one between a Workers Party voice in Parliament and an Aljunied team with two ministers, a potential Speaker of Parliament, a potential minister and a most effective Town Council chairman.

Though I wish the outcome had been different, Aljunied voters have made their choice.

Many of my supporters asked me to stay on to win back Aljunied in five years time.  I wanted to level with them and told them last night that it is better for a younger person to take on this important task. I’m already 57 years old and would be 62 by then.  Naturally I would help to ensure a smooth handover.

As we ended our campaign on 5 May, I talked about the importance of transforming the PAP.  This is a belief I’ve held for some time.  It was not something I felt I could say when the campaign started.  But, as the campaign went on, as we heard the growing cry from the heart, I decided to make it plain.  Like it or not, we are entering a new phase in Singapore’s political development.  How we respond to it will decide Singapore’s destiny in the 21st century.

I would help in whatever way I can to bring about this transformation of the PAP.  I wish I had a mandate from the people of Aljunied to be a strong advocate of such transformation.  But I don’t.

As for remaining in public life, I will contribute in whatever modest way possible.

Many young people have stepped forward to help me in this campaign. Even more have cheered me on.  It is not good that so many of them feel alienated from the Singapore they love.  I look forward to continue working with them so that the Singapore we struggle for is the Singapore they feel is their own. As to the actual role I can play, I’ll be happy to respond to them.  In the last few years, I have learnt much from my young friends.   Often they led me rather than I led them.

A younger generation has been politicized in this GE.

Since the GE results came out, there has been a flood of support for me expressed personally, through friends and relatives, on email and, in an astonishing way, on Internet and FB. The words expressed are heartfelt.  Many wrote me long passages, some in tears.  I’m grateful for the kind and comforting words and the many good wishes.  It will be an honour for me to be an advocate of their cause.

As for what I’ll do professionally after stepping down as Minister when the new Cabinet is sworn in, I’m not rushing to make a decision.  My wife and I thought we should take our time to think this over.  We also need a break to spend more time with the family.

From the bottom of my heart, I would like to thank the people of Singapore for the honour of serving them in the last 23 years.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Exclusive TOC pictures from the rallies – 30 April

  Han Thon – WP Rally, Bedok Stadium   Damien Chng –…

PSP’s Leong Mun Wai shares his thoughts on PAP candidate Ivan Lim’s decision to drop out of the upcoming GE

People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate Ivan Lim Shaw Chuan announced last night…

【选区检讨报告出炉】林鼎:些微调整也要耗时八个月?

对于选区选区范围检讨委员会报告在上周(13日)公布报告,本社采访不同在野党领袖的看法。其中人民之声党领袖林鼎律师揶揄,看起来选区划分的调整相对轻微,不明白为何上述委会要八个月来完成? 尽管委会检讨工作没有设下时限,不过回溯2006年和2011年,选区范围检讨委会用了四个月时间提交报告。委会的成立旨在检讨选区划分,也是迈入大选前的例行工作,一般而言,公布选区划分报告,坊间都会视作即将选举的信息。 他认为,当前我国可能面对独立以来最严峻的疫情考验,报告可以在去年底就完成、发布,却选择在这个节骨眼才公开。 林鼎指出,但委会用那么长时间才交出报告是前所未有的,“或许他们不想让反对党有机会走基层宣传政见?这是令人遗憾的。” 身为律师的林鼎也说明,假设有法官判词太短、或理据不足,还会被上诉庭说“有违自然公正(nature justice)”,但选区划分报告却对于其中的更动也未有给予解释。 “反观在英国,会解释选民为何选区边界更动,甚至选民觉得这些变动不公,还可以告到高庭要求检讨。” 有鉴于此前政府已更新防疫措施,例如超过250人出席的活动受促延后或取消。林鼎质疑若当前若召开选举,可能是行动党“刻意的策略”,也会影响到选举期间的集会,最终民主成了最大输家。 至于总理早前释放信息,称如果选举提早举行,意味着将要在“风口浪尖”下,选出获得全新委任和新任期的政府,可以与国人合力面对当前艰巨挑战。 对于这种“需要获得全新委托”的论述,林鼎则斥责,现届政府任期可以到明年1月,之后他们还有三个月的时间召开选举。那么当前的疫情又如何“影响到”他们获得执政的托管权呢? 我国来届选举最迟须在明年4月前召开。

票箱若遗失可以不计? 选举修法令人起疑

新加坡民主党于昨日发文告警示民众,选举部近期提呈不寻常的选举法修改条例,充满疑点。 其中一项修法建议,规定在前往计票中心前,如已封箱的投票箱已损毁获遗失,可以不计其选票。除非选举官认为有关投票站的票数足以左右最终结果,可以重新召开新一轮投票。 有关修改选举法的动议,在本月10日通过一读。 民主党质问,为何在这个时节点提出这项修改?选举部是否能向选民解释,过去有无发生过票箱被毁获不见的事件? 该党称,过去都不曾发生类似案例,但政府却无法给出合理解释,为何要修改此规章。 在投票站直接计票 如果选举部关系票箱遗失的问题,最好的办法,就是在投票时间结束后,直接在投票站清算该站的选票总数。 “在其他国家都这么做。投票结束后,选举官就宣布开箱,在各政党候选人、代表乃至民众的在场见证下,当场唱票。” 算票结束后,选举官必须当场宣布该投票站的票数,记录并交给选举部。现今资讯工艺发达,如此计票过程肯定可以有效、迅速且透明地进行。只有在所有投票站都算好票,并总和所有投票站成绩后,才正式公布最后结果。 如此,就能解决行动党所谓担心票箱在运送到计票中心的过程中,损毁或不见的担忧。 “如果行动党政府希望打造公平透明的选举制度,首先应该让选举部从总理署的管辖下独立出来,并在独立的选举委员会监督下运作。” 文告指出,只要选举部仍在总理署的掌控下,对于选举法的任何改动,都很难让新加坡人信服。民主党呼吁行动党政府停止忽悠人民,真诚打造一个自由、公平和透明的选举制度。…