Callan Tham /

I haven’t been able to spend as much time writing as I would like, but I have held off writing this for far too long. Thus far, it has been an electric elections season in Singapore. We are witnessing contests for 82 out of 87 parliamentary seats, the most since Singapore’s independence.

As usual for Singaporeans, known to be a “pragmatic” lot, the keenly argued issues revolve around tangibles — rising cost of living and inflation, stagnant real median wage growth, spiking prices of public housing, seemingly uncontrolled immigration, and that perennial PAP carrot: estate upgrading.

All of which are, I admit, issues that demand earnest discussion and analysis. All of them affect Singaporeans, some more so than others, but none of them are trivial. I have lots of ideas on how to tackle them, but that is not what this post is about, so indulge me while I recount an incident.

On April 19th, I was invited to a dinner with Jeremy Hillman, BBC News’ Editor of Economics and Business Centre, who was here to launch the Asia Business Index. It was an enjoyable evening at One Fullerton, just catching up and exchanging views with folks like Jeremy and Francesca Unsworth, Head of BBC Newsgathering, and my fellow bloggers Kirsten HanDarryl Kang and Donaldson Tan. Hell, even Tan Kin Lian showed up.

As we sat down for dinner, Kirsten and I had plopped ourselves directly opposite Francesca at the table and when she asked us how we felt about Singapore, my response was “We don’t have a soul.”

I explained we have excellent infrastructure, a rather efficient tax code, and (at Fullerton anyway) clean streets. It all looks so clinical, so Eden-esque, that everything on the surface looks perfect. And we all know it isn’t.

So what is at stake, when Singaporeans go to the polls this Saturday, is the soul of this country. Or at least, the direction that Singapore will move towards. On the one hand, we have the mighty PAP, who has achieved their political dominance through no lack of cunning or heavy-handed smack downs. On the other, the alternative parties, who have pledged to serve not only as the loyal opposition, but also as the voice of the Singaporean people, and have also fielded their strongest slate of candidates for the longest time.

There has never been a time where internationally, respected lawyers like WP’s Chen Show Mao willingly joined the cause of an opposition party. Or former establishment men and civil servants like Dr Ang Yong Guan and Tan Jee Say campaigning as part of the SDP. And then there are names like Vincent Wijeysingha, whom I’m proud to call a friend, Gerald Giam, Michelle Lee, Nicole Seah, Tony Tan and Hazel Poa; bright and young capable minds that the PAP would’ve had no problems attracting to its ranks previously, are now proudly wearing the badges of alternative parties.

And more importantly, the proposals the alternative parties have come up with are not only cogent, coherent, and convincing to me, they also have one common thread running through all of them: that the Singapore they want to build is a country that prizes not only economic success, but also one that does not leave Singaporeans behind.

It is difficult for me not to think of my 8-month-old son as May 7th approaches, and I decide what kind of Singapore I want him to inherit. And my choice is clear as day. Because I don’t want Ayrton to grow up in a society that defines success as a mad dash for cash, status and material satisfaction.

I don’t want him to grow up in a country where you don’t stand up to bullies and allow yourself to be browbeaten into submission.

Nor in a country where ideas cannot be robustly debated or deconstructed, or one where he cannot challenge or question presumptions.

Nor a country where accountability and responsibility is non-existent.

Nor one where you apologise not because you are sorry, but when you need to gain sympathy.

Nor one where character assassination is an acceptable part of progression.

Nor one where the price for looking the other way is a fresh coat of paint for your block of flats.

Nor one where his freedom to choose his path in life will be compromised in any shape, way or form.

Nor one where we chose to forget to care for our elderly, the weak, the helpless, the poor, the homeless, and leaving them be is far easier than doing the right thing.

Nor one where we mistake servitude as gratitude, and where integrity is only a buzzword and not a principle to live by.

Nor one that allows our humanity to be sucked out of us and replacing it with the Singapore dollar.

Nor one where fear shackles and restraints our every move and decision.

Nor one where arrogance is not only accepted, but richly rewarded financially.

If I allow that to happen, I would have failed in my duties as a father and a Singaporean.

Make no mistake, my friends. There is more at stake than we think. We are not only voting for political parties, we are voting for the direction and soul of Singapore. Your vote will decide if you want Singapore to be more humane instead of staying money-oriented; to reach out and help fellow Singaporeans who have been cruelly left behind or reach for more profits; and a future that we are proud to tell our children about, a principled, compassionate existence, or merely one where telling your neighbours about your promotion or showing off your new sports car is the order of the day.

It is for these reasons that I ask you, on May 7th, vote for change. We, the Singaporean people, need it.

Visit TOC’s General Election website for more GE news.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

又是个人代步工具充电引起! 后港组屋火患所幸无伤亡

昨日(5日)后港一带发生一起火灾事故,涉及与个人代步工具有关,所幸现场两名受害者仅受到惊吓,最终也未送往医院治疗。 根据民防部队文告表示,他们于昨日下午五点左右接获通报,前往后港91街第927座组屋11楼的单位。据悉火势延烧到走廊,民防部队赶紧用水桶装水将火势扑灭。 民防部队表示屋内有两名受害者,将两人救出后,两人受到惊吓,民防部队的护理人员马上为两人检查,但他们拒绝入院治疗。 从民防部队所拍摄的现场画面可见,火势已将墙壁熏黑,并且将个人代步工具烧毁。 经初步调查显示,该起火灾事故与个人代步工具有关,着火时个人代步工具正在充电,而且该个人代步工具并非使用合格标准UL2272的电源。 最后,民防部队也呼吁所有的个人代步工具的骑士应在购买有UL2272认证设备的个人代步工具。

满城尽是黑衣人 港特首林郑月娥致歉

今日(16日),香港民间人权阵线再举办“反送中”集会,再有众多港民踊跃响应,香港政府大楼立法会周边道路如夏悫道等,都挤满穿黑衣的集会群众,至截稿为止人群都未离去,今日集会人数可能超过此前记录。 据了解,原本夏悫道塞满集会群众,不过当有救护车要通行,集会群众马上散开,分出一条车路让救护车优先通过。 面对群众压力,香港行政长官林郑月娥则在今晚8时30分透过文字声明,向港民道歉,承认政府在工作上的不足,令社会产生矛盾和纷争,令市民失望和痛心。 不过他的声明中并没有提及是否会撤回有关逃犯条例。早前,她表示将展延通过该条例修法。 在6月12日,林郑月娥批评示威者破坏社会安宁、罔顾法纪,并指现场状况不是和平集会,而是公然、有组织地发动“暴动”。她也指每当有涉及中央与特区、内地和香港的议题,都会被部分人士挑起矛盾和纷争。 有分析指林郑月娥办事能力恐遭中国中央政府质疑,前者将面对下台压力。 香港政府发言人作出以下回应: 过去两个星期日,十分多市民透过游行表达意见,政府明白市民游行是出于对香港的关心和热爱。 对于市民一直以平和,理性方式表达意见,行政长官清楚听到,并认同这正是香港作为一个文明,自由,开放,多元的社会,一直展现的互相尊重,和而不同的精神。政府重视和珍惜香港这些核心价值。 考虑到社会有强烈不同的意见,政府已停止立法会大会对修订“逃犯条例”的工作,希望借此可让社会尽快回复平静和避免任何人受到伤害。政府重申并无重启程序的时间表。 行政长官承认由于政府工作上的不足,令香港社会出现很大的矛盾和纷争,令很多市民感到失望和痛心,行政长官为此向市民致歉,并承诺会以最有诚意,最谦卑的态度接受批评,加以改进,为广大市民服务。 完…

慈善组织14日办拾荒者生活体验活动 民主党前进党响应

上月中旬,“乐于助人”组织邀请各党组织派出代表,参加“穿上他的鞋走一英里” (A Mile In Their Shoes)活动。除了先前已允诺参与的民主党外,前进党也答允参与。 “乐于助人”组织表示他们尚在等候其他受邀党团组织的回复。受邀单位包括人民行动党、工人党、新加坡民主党、人民党、国民团结党、革新党、新加坡进步党、以及人民力量党等。 活动定于本月14日进行,该组织表示,为提升群众和政治领袖,对年长拾荒者困境的醒觉,广邀朝野政党参与他们即将举办的有关活动,以期将来能在国会为拾荒者们发声。 为此活动,该组织也将在Give.Asia开设不同的账户,让民众可以捐款支持心属政党,而每个账户所筹集的款项将会平均分派给该党的纸皮收集者。 这将是别开生面的活动:试想想由每个参与活动的政治人物,由一位拾荒长者陪伴,指导他们如何收纸皮,亲身体验这些群体每日的生活和辛劳。主办方将全程录制活动过程,观察参与者与拾荒者之间的互动。  

Buying trophy properties in a country

Before Chinese New Year, hubby told me he had prepared new banknotes…