Sharon Claire /

I am a regular Singaporean. I was born and bred in Singapore. I studied in our local schools and universities and, unlike a whole bunch of my schoolmates, actually bothered to recite the Pledge every morning. I have lived in almost every residential type in this country, from a rental flat to a HUDC (does anyone even remember that anymore?) to a condominium to a 3-room HDB flat. I take public transport everywhere I go, partially because I do not possess a driver’s licence, but also because it’s more environmentally friendly.

I earn more than the national average, which is not saying much. If I’m careful with my finances, I will be able to clear the loan I took from the HDB in about 15 years.

I have pastimes. I like to dance, I like to sing. Above all, I love to cook and read. Once in a while, I like to go on short holidays to nearby places.

I am pretty average, by most standards.

~

Even 10 years ago, I knew something was wrong.

I watched silently as they justified high ministerial pay with the rationale of “so they wouldn’t jump ship to private corporations where they would earn loads more money”. I frowned: “Shouldn’t they be serving the country because they want to make Singapore a better place, and not because it gives an equivalent pay to what they can get outside? That’s not right”. Yet I brushed it off as youthful idealism.

And I watched as their pay increased while my dad and mum struggled through their ever-increasing health problems to make ends meet to put us through university.

I watched silently as yet another PRC coffeeshop attendant wiped my table, not fully comprehending what was happening or why. My hostel roommate, a lovely girl from China, confided to me one day that the Singapore government had gone overseas and recruited all these students, promising them jobs in the bioscience sector, but now there was a glut of bioscience graduates with no jobs. I brushed it off as being a simple dip in the economic cycle and, following a recovery, everything would be fine. I even reassured my roommate that that would be the case.

I wonder where those extra graduates are, now.

I watched silently as the officer signed off on the forms that would land me in 30 years’ debt for an 80sqm space. A space I could pretend to own, at least until I defaulted on the repayments for too long. They handed me the keys, and I wondered why I allowed myself to be persuaded by my fiance to buy a flat now (“because the prices are going up already and while we can still afford it”) – when only one of us was working, with a pay that had not even crossed the $2.5K mark. How on earth were we going to service the loan?

I later found out that he had never been more right in his entire life.

I watched silently as yet another person tried to squeeze onto the bus, and winced as the door whacked into that person’s back while closing. It seemed strange that not all that long ago, a crowded bus did not have people balancing precariously on its steps, hanging on for dear life as the driver barrelled down the road. Is it my memory that is faulty? I hear the now-familiar refrain of “Please move in! I’m closing the door!”, and the sound of EZ-link cards dutifully scanned – a method to prevent fare cheats – and recall an occasion when I was four and accompanied my grandmother to the nearby wet market. We were on our way back, and had stopped at the bus stop just outside our block to catch a breath. An SBS bus stopped, and the driver opened the door and called out, “Aunty! Do the two of you need a ride? Come aboard, I won’t charge for it”.

I realised I would never see that happening ever again.

I watched silently as yet another Fairprice and yet another Sheng Siong opened, and recalled the old uncle who ran the mamak shop at Block 19. I remember reading the report where they interviewed him about small shops surviving in a world where supermarkets and hypermarkets were increasingly the norm. I closed my eyes and recalled the smell of the shop, dark and reeking of dried provisions, wafer biscuits and fresh fruit. But young eyes are not meant to see the dust gathering on the bottles of detergent, nor the yellowing of yesterday’s news laid out faithfully every morning. I went back three years ago, and Uncle, who always remembered my mum and always smiled when my mum introduced me (“Remember this one? This one was the small fatty ‘bombom’. The youngest”), was gone. He had died not long after that interview.

And I realised that very soon, I would not be able to bring my children back to do the same, because like Uncle, that shop would be gone

And I watched silently, as yet another grandmother piled a cardboard box onto her cart, yet another uncle rummaged through the bin for a drink can, yet another aunty placed packets of tissue paper on my table. I even recall thinking, with a certain amount of bemusement, that they used to put 3 packets for $1, and now they were bundling 5 for $2. Even tissue packets are subject to inflation. I thought of my late grandmother, and how I always regretted not being able to take her out for a meal with my first paycheck, because she died in the middle of my O’Levels. I wondered what she would have made of all this.

Suddenly I realised that I was glad she couldn’t see it at all.

~

I watched silently as my country changed before my very eyes

And I did nothing about it.

I let other people dictate what my country should become.

I let them tell me that this is progress, that this is necessary, without asking whether it really was.

I let them turn my people into mindless, uncaring automatons, concerned only for themselves, waiting for the next ‘dividend’, trying to get ahead and leaving others behind, except when maybe a charity show rolled around.

I let them put my fellow Singaporeans in debt while I comfortably pay off my loan.

I let them take away the financial security of my people.

I let them tell me that the Pledge I faithfully recited and teared over during National Day parade broadcasts is an “aspiration”.

I let them tell me that money is paramount, not heart.

I let them silence my voice by denying me a chance to vote.

I let them do all that.

And if you do not use your vote, YOUR VOICE, then you, too, have let them.

~

I will not claim to know exactly what goes on on-the-ground. I acknowledge that my life, beyond a couple of blips, can be considered charmed by many out there, even privileged by certain standards. Unlike some of the candidates, I cannot lay claim to having gone from poverty to wherever I am, because I never experienced true poverty. I do not claim to know the ins and outs of the policies that have led us to where we are today. I will not even say I have the solution to go back to a better time, because I don’t.

But I know what I have seen.

And I will no longer let them use my vote, MY VOICE, to let them turn my country into what THEY want.

I will use my vote, MY VOICE, to tell them what I want my country to be like.

And I vote for Singapore.

Visit TOC’s General Election website for more GE news.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SMRT taxi driver banned from GrabCar service for harassing its driver

A man was banned by GrabCar from the ride-hailing platform for making…

调高就业准证薪金门槛 王腾忆称或“过度保护”本地劳动力

昨日(26日)人力部宣布,将进一步调整外籍雇员政策,包括提高S准证和就业准证薪金门槛。 针对PME(专业人士、经理和行政人员)的就业准证,在今年3月刚提高到3900元。至于S准证,(适用于技术人员)目前的薪金门槛,为每月不少于2千400元。 尽管民众欢迎上述举措,仍提醒“上有政策,下有对策”,必须提防雇主“走漏洞”。 然而,新加坡中小企业商会(ASME)会长王腾忆(Kurt Wee)却有不同看法,据《海峡时报》报导,他认为过去八、九年来,本地企业已面对紧缩的外籍劳动力市场。 他更担忧上述政策对本地劳动力“过度保护”,恐怕会对新加坡劳动力的应变和竞争能力带来负面影响。 王腾忆早在2002年便参与中小企业商会,2004年年仅30岁即任副会长,2013年担任升任会长。他涉足投资和私募股权领域,也在一些政府、慈善获学术机构担任委会委员。2011年,他也曾提名官委议员。 曾提出二外籍雇员对一本地人比例 实则,在2017年的一场公共对话会,王腾忆曾提出本地雇员和外籍雇员的理想比例是二比一,意味着职场上三位雇员中有两位是外籍人士。 “当然2:1比例不是最佳的。但我们也不一定要效仿杜拜,九或10位外籍人士对比一名本地雇员的比例。但将来往1比二的比例发展并非不可想象。” 他当时也宣称,两位外籍雇员对比一名本地人的比例,仍是“可以管控且能赋予企业更多产能。”

从许文远称“采用创新科技不求领先” 一窥我国交通科技投资现况

基础建设统筹部长兼交通部长许文远,声称我国在采用创新科技方面不求领先,认为公交等基础服务采用创新科技时不应操之过急,需花时间先充分理解,包括参与研发和实验。 根据《联合早报》报导,许文远在昨日出席智能交通系统世界大会,在开幕礼致词时称,科技非交通系统唯一考量,从政治角度看,最重要是提供安全可靠、大众负担得起的交通系统。 他认为任何智能交通系统,都应睿智地研发和使用,他以拥车证和公路电子收费(ERP)为例,解释科技如何改善交通。 不过许文远似乎很支持5G网络,认为“有无限潜能”,可推动无人驾驶车成长,也能勇于新一代大士港,应尽快采用。 同时,政府大量投资在公交,每年为公交运营成本拨款近20亿元津贴。 他也提醒智能交通系统的利弊,包括可能出现采用科技的私召车Grab服务,与传统德士司机之间的鸿沟;智能化交通系统也存在受数码攻击的风险。 上述智能交通系统世界大会首次在新加坡举办,来自80各国家约一万多名交通领域人士、学者、企业和政府机构等,参与研讨交通系统议题和新方案。 对特斯拉电动车“不感兴趣” 事实上,或许内阁当中不仅是许文远对引入创新交通科技“不求领先”。 积极推广电动车的特斯拉(TESLA)总裁埃隆·马斯克(Elon Musk),曾批评新加坡似乎对于推广电动车行动迟缓,并在今年1月的推文称“政府对推动电动车不感冒”。 We…

SGX introduces S$5 million care package to boost coronavirus relief measures

A care package worth S$5 million has been introduced by the Singapore…