Benjamin Cheah/ photos by Terry Xu

A wet evening was in store at the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) rally on Tuesday. In spite of vigorous rain and parking wardens refusing entry to nearby parking lots, the crowd grew rapidly in the shower.

Ms Teo Soh Lung delivering her speech after the rain

Education was the first topic of the night. Ms Teo Ser Lung said the SDP succeeded in making the People’s Action Party (PAP) admit that current class sizes were too big, leading to reduction of class sizes. She was referring to the SDP’s policy of reducing class sizes to a teacher-student ratio of 1:20, and classes for elective subjects respectively. Ms Teo also accused the government of ‘discriminating’ against students in the normal stream. She said that these classes have an average of 40 pupils, and their teachers are placed under a great deal of stress. This stress causes teachers to leave teaching for private tuition. Further, Ms Teo said that special needs children were not catered for by the government, as volunteers, not public schools, had to take care of their education. She also said, ‘We are a first world nation, and education should be free!’ Finally, she said that, if elected, the SDP will check the government to ensure it continues to place a premium on education.

The other speakers raised contentions with Mr Lim Swee Say’s remarks that voting for the opposition would result in a ‘rojak government with rojak policies’. Rojak is a fruit and vegetable salad, named after the Malay word for ‘mixture’. Mr Lim meant that he felt a coalition government was undesirable for Singapore. Mr Tan raised the most detailed objection. Saying ‘rojak is quite nice to eat’, he said that coalition governments were desirable. Mainstream political parties may not represent the interests of the people, he argued, but non-mainstream parties do. Coalition governments therefore represent the people’s every interest.  He cited coalition governments in the United Kingdom and Europe as proof that coalition governments were becoming more popular.

The SDP also raised issues with the PAP’s strategy of promising upgrading projects should the people elect them. Mr Alec Tok, in particular, asked on stage if Mr Lee Hsien Loong thought that this strategy was ‘unfair’. He said that the people should not let the promises of upgrading overshadow ‘fundamental problems’. He added that the residents of Potong Pasir and Hougang, who have consistently returned opposition politicians to Parliament in past elections, were not swayed by promises of upgrading.

Ms Michelle Lee

Economics was a hot issue throughout the rally. Speakers consistently asserted that Singaporeans were facing competition from foreigners for jobs and housing, which depresses wages and increases prices for flats. Singapore’s economic model was also questioned. Dr John Tan asked, ‘How can we call ourselves an open market if sixty percent of our companies are indirectly linked to the government?’ Ms Michelle Lee said that the government could control costs of living through Goods and Services Tax (GST), setting prices of housing and public transportation, but failed to do so.  Mr Tan Jee Say, citing a ‘university study’, said that half of inflation in Singapore was caused by domestic factors, singling out government policies for criticism. He added that Singaporeans have been ‘overtaxed’, explaining that Singapore’s surpluses were drawn from taxes and criticizing the need to have such a large surplus. Mr Alec Tok bemoaned rising prices of public housing, saying that young Singaporeans now need 20 to 30 years to pay for Housing and development Board (HDB) flats.

In response to this, the speakers unveiled a multi-pronged approach to solutions. Dr John Tan proposed gradually closing down Temasek Holdings and Government-linked companies and supporting local businesses and entrepreneurs in their place. The nature of this support was not described.  Mr Tan recommended removing GST on ‘essential goods’, and setting it at 3% for all other goods. He did not explain what these ‘essential goods’ were. Mr Tan recommended growing the service sector. He also raised the most ambitious proposal: a sixty billion-dollar investment in education, services, infrastructure and public healthcare. The money would be drawn from the reserves. Mr Tan said that this investment plan would ‘give hope’ to businessmen, people in creative entrepreneurs, and workers.

Dr James Gomez’s speech was a somber explanation of the SDP’s ‘shadow health policy’, titled ‘Healing with Care’. Dr Gomez began by criticizing the current healthcare ‘funding model’ as ‘problematic’. He said that Medisave does not grant enough money to cover treatment, Medishield provides inadequate coverage of illnesses, and Medifund is a sign that Medisave and Medishield could not pay for healthcare to begin with. Consequently, he added, many patients could not afford to pay for treatment, and healthcare providers would be placed under great stress because they have to ‘implement hospital policy’ in addition to looking after the ill. He did not specifiy what ‘implement hospital policy’ meant.

He proposed a series of measures to address this. The Health Ministry’s budget would be increased to ten billion dollars, or about three times its current budget. This would be achieved by drawing from the reserves and reducing the budgets of other ministries, notably the Ministry of Defence. The number of hospital beds and staff would be increased. In the interim period before all the beds arrive, void decks would be converted to clinics to ease the burden on existing healthcare facilities. A national global medical insurance policy would also be implemented to cover Singaporeans around the world. Finally, payments for healthcare should be ‘reasonable and affordable’.

Dr Vincent Wijeysingha

Dr Vincent Wijeysingha’s speech was a message of humanity. He began his speech by telling a story. He covered a day in the life of the average Singaporean, in the process highlighting the problems people face. This included traffic jams, Electronic Road Pricing, competition from foreigners for jobs and the pressure to work harder as a result, prices of food at and rents faced by hawker stalls, healthcare costs, and taxes. He reinforced his colleagues’ earlier points, and spoke about his reactions to the problems people faced. He focused in particular on the plight of elderly people working as cleaners. He said ‘Our hearts bleed for our nation’, adding ‘this cannot continue’.

The party also addressed issues relevant to the constituency. Mr Tok recommended building a polyclinic in the constituency. The flier the SDP distributed prior to the rally promised that SDP MPs would donate half of their allowances to help the people should the SDP candidates be elected.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

涉嫌杀害少女张玮凌 嫌犯还押一周下月7日续审

因涉嫌在13年前杀害失踪少女张玮凌,35岁的阿默达尼尔(Ahmad Danial Bin Mohamed Rafa’ee),在本月17日被提控上庭。 在今日(31日),达尼尔由Shashi Nathan律师团队辩护,透过视讯出庭。警方检控官成功申请,将嫌犯继续还押一周以作进一步调查。 据知嫌犯目前身体不适,在樟宜监狱医疗中心就医。辩护律师Nathan亦不反对还押,也要求安排与嫌犯会面以商讨案情。 案件将展延至下月7日续审。 案件背景 达尼尔此前曾在知名电子游戏配件制造商雷蛇(Razer)公司上班,担任创意经理。他被指控于2007年6月30日凌晨,与另一32岁男子拉吉(Ragil Putra…

Temasek: We’re already out of Hyflux before they issued preference shares and perpetual bonds

On Sat (30 Mar), at least 500 people went to Hong Lim…

可透过其他管道援助度难关 沈丰吉促勿动用公积金存款

人力部收入保障政策司司长沈丰吉指出,我国政府在财政预算案配套下,拨出637亿新元来协助受到冠状病毒疫情影响的企业、家庭和居民,因此促请公积金会员尽量不要动用到公积金户口内的存款。 一名《海峡时报》读者Dendroff Terance William,询问是否能从公积金局户口提款5000新元,以度过目前的经济危机。 对此沈丰吉指出,政府透过坚韧团结、团结和同舟共济这三份财政预算案拨款,更透过各层次协助受影响的企业、家庭和个人。 企业方面,政府加强了雇佣补贴配套(Jobs Support Scheme),协助企业留住本地员工,补贴在职员工本月薪资的首4600新元,长达九个月。 家庭方面,也获得关怀与援助配套援助,其中包括给予所有成年新加坡人的一次性现金入息、以及给予年长者或未成年子女的父母额外补贴。 低收入家庭可通过就业入息特别补助和必需品补助券,而失业或收入受到大幅度影响地国人,也能透过短期援助基金、冠状病毒援助基金以及自雇人士收入辅助计划申请辅助。 沈丰吉表示,只要不动用到基本存款和全额存款的资金,目前所有55岁以上的中央公积金(CPF)会员,都可以从其普通户口和特殊户口中取出5000元或更多的现金,来度过目前的困境。然而,他并不鼓励人们这么做。 他指出,政府认为,任何公积金领出政策的变动,都会影响到国人的退休储蓄能力,因此促请会员们使用其他方式来度过目前的经济危机。…

NUS former educator Tan Ee Lyn shared students’ sexual harassment study on Straits Times

Straits Times (ST) senior correspondent Tan Ee Lyn left National University of…