The following article was first published on 25 March 2011.


The makeshift cubicle that served as the office for Mr Chiam's Meet The People sessions for the past 27 years

Andrew Loh /

Seeing Mr Chiam See Tong up close is inspiring. Anyone who thinks that age or the two strokes he suffered in recent years have dented his spirit would be highly mistaken. The veteran opposition politician is as stout-hearted as he has always been.

As I waited for him to end his Meet-The-People session on Thursday at Block 108 in Potong Pasir, I was struck by the sight of what must now be legend – that singular table sited at a corner of the void deck, partitioned for privacy by aluminium panels into a makeshift cubicle.

That’s where Mr Chiam has conducted his MPS for 27 years.

The ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) – that is, the Government – has refused to provide offices for opposition Members of Parliament (MP). PAP MPs conduct their MPS’s at the air-conditioned offices of its PAP Community Foundation (PCF) kindergartens premises. And since opposition parties do not have their own chain of kindergartens and their MPs are not of the PAP, the PAP would say it is thus not appropriate to have opposition MPs use the PCF spaces.

Mr Chiam’s void deck cubicle is truly a symbol of how utterly petty our politics is, as played out by the ruling PAP.

As a Singaporean, I am ashamed that we would treat an elected Member of Parliament this way.

But Mr Chiam is unfazed.

“If a person … really wants to be an MP,” Mr Chiam says, “he can work the ground and he can show himself to the people – that he is hardworking and he is for the people. I think he will get elected that way and show that he is a true representative of the people.”

And as such, Mr Chiam does not believe in the Non-constituency MP (NCMP) scheme. “I don’t believe in going into Parliament by the back door,” he says. “[The] NCMP is not really elected by the majority of Singaporeans. It is a token of the PAP.”

I was curious about what the veteran politician thought of the six new PAP candidates unveiled so far. “They look very impressive on paper,” Mr Chiam says. “They have to win the hearts and minds of the voters, isn’t it? And that is a difficult task because it takes time. You can’t [befriend] a person overnight.”

Turning to his health, I asked if he is able to withstand the rigour and stress of an election. “Well, you must remember I was a sportsman in my early days,” Mr Chiam says.  “I was a school swimmer. And when I say school swimmer, I mean school swimmer,” he says with evident pride in his voice, “because I’m from ACS (Anglo-Chinese School).  It’s somebody to be a school swimmer in ACS. You must be strong and fit.”

Those who still doubt his physical ability should visit Bishan-Toa Payoh on Sunday where he will be conducting his walkabout, Mr Chiam says. “Then you see whether I am fit or not,” he added. He is expected to lead a team to contest the area in the elections in his bid to win a Group Representation Constituency (GRC) – something which no opposition party has achieved so far.

Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC is helmed by Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng. Mr Wong on Wednesday had questioned the opposition’s intention in wanting to win a GRC. He asked if this was to satisfy personal ambitions and questioned if the opposition winning a GRC has anything to do with benefiting Singaporeans.

“Is it about the interest and missions of political parties or an individual’s interest to create a legacy or to make history?” Mr Wong asked. Mr Wong also challenged the opposition to reveal their candidates early so voters can scrutinize them.

“Most of Singapore already know the candidates of the opposition,” Mr Chiam says. “Opposition like to talk a lot. They inadvertently reveal the names of their candidates. I think everybody knows who is standing at Bishan Toa Payoh. In fact I announced my candidacy about a year ago. How can you say that we did not reveal?”

Mr Wong seems to have alluded particularly to Mr Chiam when he asked if the opposition’s reasons for wanting to win a GRC was so that its candidates could leave a legacy – a personal ego trip rather than out of consideration for the future of Singapore.

“We are not so small-minded,” Mr Chiam says. “Our purpose is mainly to expand the opposition. At the moment as you know opposition only has two MPs in Parliament. PAP has 82. If the opposition captures a GRC, that will be a big psychological blow to the PAP. It’s no longer an impregnable fortress.”

And Mr Chiam added: “Any step that the opposition does that dents the PAP is one step forward for the voters.”

Mr Chiam remains just as sharp as he ever was.

Perhaps Mr Wong should be more concerned about his own legacy. Besides going down in history as the minister who let a limping suspected terrorist escape – not once, but twice – Mr Wong has only won in one election, despite having contested six General Elections in total so far.

His first and only victory was at his very first election – in Kuo Chuan SMC in 1984. After the Government introduced the GRC system in 1988, Mr Wong has had five walkovers.

What a contrast to Mr Chiam’s six consecutive contests and victories!

History indeed will remember Mr Chiam as one who went about quietly in his work in serving the people, in spite of the odds and the mountains he has had to climb, put in his way by a ruling party which apparently holds an elected representative of the people in little regard – if he is not of their ilk.

Mr Chiam’s legacy is, really, that of humility and steely determination. He has contested in eight General Elections. Won six of them – and going on his ninth. As far as I know, no other MP in Singapore’s post-independence history has such a record of six consecutive outright wins.  Not even Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew (five).

So, Mr Chiam has nothing else to prove to anyone, least of all to Mr Wong.

He does not need to win a GRC, in my opinion, for his name to be remembered. Indeed, his 27 years of service is testament enough. Yet he continues to serve despite his physical condition.

But perhaps what is most inspiring to me is that Mr Chiam’s example shows that serving the people does not have to include multi-million dollar paychecks and posh or ostentatious surroundings.

All it takes, really, is a bit of heart.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singaporean households find recycling regularly convenient but can’t differentiate between waste, ‘recyclable’ and ‘reusable’

In a joint statement by the Ministry of the Environment and Water…

Lee Hsien Yang shares late Lee Kuan Yew’s view on not wanting 6.5 million population for Singapore

On Tuesday (28 July), Mr Lee Hsien Yang (LHY), younger son of…

那些年,公共机构发生的数据泄露事故

11月27日,总理公署发文告表示,总理李显龙全盘接受公共机构数据安全检讨委员会,所提呈有关保护数据安全和维护个人隐私的建议。 上述委员会提呈的建议包括,提出提升数据保护、预防资料外泄、加快侦测、提升公务员对数据保护的意识和能力、完善问责制度,以及为应对未来数码需求,加强治理架构等建议。 据了解,过去八个月该委会抽查94个政府机构的336个系统,结果显示64巴仙被评为低风险、23巴仙被评为中等等闲以及13巴仙被列为高风险。 国务资政兼安全统筹部长张志贤,则保证将尽最大努力减少数据泄露风险;至于卫生部也声称将全面采纳上述委会提出的建议。 为何政府要特别成立上述公共机构数据安全检讨委员会?正是因为过去两年发生严重的数据和网安疏漏等事故。 总理公署在今年3月31日正式宣布成立该委会,由张志贤担任主席,委员会成员包括负责智慧国计划的外交部长维文医生、主管网络安全事务的通讯及新闻部长易华仁、主管公共服务的贸工部长陈振声,以及主管政府科技局的通讯及新闻部兼交通部高级政务部长普杰立医生。 150万病患个资外泄轰动一时 回溯去年7月,惊传有骇客以恶意软件入侵新加坡保健服务集团(SingHealth)系统,盗取了150万病患资料,其中16万住院治疗记录外泄,堪称历年来最严重,消息一出轰动一时,卫生部长颜金勇甚至特别为此事致歉。 我国对网络保安的重视,致使政府对资讯工艺的拨款从5巴仙提升至8巴仙,据《海峡时报》报导,仅在2014财政年,新加坡就为网络安全项目耗费了4亿零860万新元。 尽管政府委任前军队准将许智贤,掌管两个新开设的网络安全机构,即负责全国网络防卫事务的国防网络署(DCO),以及直接隶属总理署旗下的网络安全局(CSA),但不幸的是150万病患个资外泄的事还是发生了。 今年1月,个人资料保护委员会宣布重罚综合保健信息系统公司(IHiS)和新保集团,共被罚款100万元;IHiS的一名技术主管,以及一名保安事故应变经理被开除。 费雷拉泄露1.42万名艾滋带原者个资…

罪状增至18项、受害者11人 留英大学生申请开庭前出国

就读英国顶尖大学的22岁我国男子,日前被指涉及偷拍女生沐浴和如厕事件。但是在上周五面控时增加了18项控状,而受害者人数也从原本的两人增加到11人,包括两名和他上同一所大学的留学生。 被告曾于去年10月面控,指偷拍两名相识的本地女生沐浴和如厕,但是随后获得法院批准提早启程到英国,办理入学手续和居住事宜。 他当时所面对的两项侮辱女性尊严的控状,是针对他于2015年12月2日凌晨1时30分,假乌节酒店客房的厕所内安装录像机,偷拍一名女子的洗澡过程,还有就是于2016年12月23日晚上8时30分,在东部一公寓单位厕所内安装录像机,偷拍另一名女子如厕。 而上周五新增的18项控状,分别为17项侮辱女性尊严罪名,及一项触犯影片法令罪名。 根据法庭文件指出,他被指于2018年以来一共偷拍了九名女子,多达20段受害者沐浴、如厕和更衣的视频。其中有16段视频是在被告独居的公寓内拍下,且有一名受害者在案发时还未成年。 法官谕令,基于部分受害者是被告的亲友,为了保护他们,媒体不能公开受害者和被告,以及他们就读大学的名字。 面对有关的控状,被告表示都不认罪。 控方反对让被告出国避免逃跑 基于审案日期还未定,被告表示想要在下周返回英国上课,因此向法庭申请出国,却遭到控方反对。两方因此于昨日临时返回国家法院,准备进行陈词后,交由法院决定。 控方指出,警方调查已经结束,控方随时准备进入审讯阶段,并要求被告为自己的罪行负责,不应该次次都让他以学业为由而出国,否则案件将会一拖再拖。 被告代表律师却不认同有关指控,并表示控方没有理由做出反对,一则是审讯日期未定案,而且被告有遵守诺言,在去年出国后于上个月返回我国,没有逃避责任的嫌疑。 律师也表示,被告将会在今年3月回国,不会影响审讯进行。他认为控方不应该将被告的学业和审讯混为一谈,只需在意被告是否有如期回国即可。…