Benjamin Cheah / photos by Jean Loo

Sound and fury were the order of the night at the Singapore People Party’s rally. The speakers engaged the audience with humour, mixed with jabs at the People’s Action Party (PAP). The crowd cheered with every mention of the SPP, Secretary General Mr Chiam See Tong, and Potong Pasir candidate Mrs Lina Chiam; and booed whenever the PAP was mentioned. The speakers worked up the crowd to a fever pitch, keeping them there until the rally ended.

Mr Sim Kek Tong, chairman of the SPP and candidate for Hong Kah North, kicked off the evening with a speech in Chinese. He criticized the Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) and Group Representative Constituency (GRC) schemes, and proposed replacing GRCs with Single-Member Constituencies. Mr Jimmy Lee, who will be contesting in Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, spent his speech praising the people of Potong Pasir and Mr Chiam, and slamming the PAP for withdrawing funds for upgrading projects in Potong Pasir. He concluded by challenging the PAP to issue the same threat in Hong Kah North and Bishan-Toa Payoh.

Mr Mohamad Hamim bin Aliyas started with a speech in Malay. The crowd quieted down; most of the audience is Chinese. The Chiams arrived in the middle of this speech, and the crowd burst into cheers and chants of ‘SPP!’ and ‘Chiam See Tong!’ Excitement rippled through the crowd as the Chiams took the stage. A man in a wheelchair, a little girl and a middle-aged woman took turns to garland them. After the Chiams settled down, Mr Hamim completed his speech, and made another in English. He repeated the points he made in the last rally on the lack of government accountability and transparency, as well as ministerial salaries and unchecked influx of foreigners. He mooted the idea of having Singaporeans representing Singapore in sports, to loud cheers and applause.

On Friday, Mr Wilfred Leung promised to talk about Mr Sitoh Yipin, the PAP candidate for Potong Pasir. This was the theme of his speech, criticising Mr Sitoh for not doing anything for the residents, and the PAP for refusing to grant funds to upgrade Potong Pasir. The crowd booed and jeered with increasing intensity at every mention of the PAP and Mr Sitoh. Mr Leung praised the people of Potong Pasir, saying, “There is no price to pay for the soul of Potong Pasir!” This was met with cheers and applause.

Benjamin Pwee based his speech on two themes: listening and security. He said that the opposition will listen to the people’s voice, unlike the PAP. ‘There is nothing to fear for Singapore’s security if you vote for the opposition’, he said. Referring to Singapore’s Total Defence concept, he assured the audience that the opposition will ensure Singapore’s security. The military would defend all Singaporeans, regardless of political affiliations. Everybody, regardless of race and religion, could live in peace with each other. The opposition would listen to investors to ensure funds are invested wisely. Most of all, he emphasized the need to rid oneself of fear. ‘We need to dare to get rid of the fear that holds us back,’ he said. ‘Dare to vote because you are Singaporean!’ The crowd erupted into cheers at that remark.

The rally, however, belonged to the Chiams. Mr Chiam mounted the podium to much fanfare. He began his speech with, ‘I’m afraid you have to be quiet because my voice is not so good.’ Members of the audience immediately shush each other. This silence was not to last. Every other sentence Mr Chiam said was interrupted by ear-splitting cheers. He said he is contesting Bishan-Toa Payoh ‘to promote democracy in Singapore’, and that democracy cannot exist ‘without opposition in Parliament’. Thanking the crowd for their support, he added, “The people shall not be bullied any more. Everyone will be treated equally.”

Mrs Chiam spent the first half of her speech detailing how the PAP had treated Mr Chiam and the people of Potong Pasir, by discontinuing bus service 141, denying children places in PAP Community Foundation kindergartens, and kept Mass Rapid Transport stations around Potong Pasir closed. She also took issues with Mr Sitoh, saying that he took credit for the recent lift upgrading project even though the residents and town council of Potong Pasir paid for it.

Near the end, Mrs Chiam spoke briefly about her policy positions. She advocated more subsidies for childcare and healthcare for the elderly, with emphasis on early detection of diseases. She promised to look into the problems of Sennett estate, even though they do not pay service and maintenance charges to the Potong Pasir Town council. Finally, she said that senior citizens should be able to use their concession cards at all times, instead of only during concession hours.

Before the rally began, the SPP distributed fliers detailing the party’s stance on public housing. In the flier, the party raised issues with rising prices of flats, pointing out the average new family would have to support ageing parents and young children in addition to paying off a 30-year loan, causing them to be income-poor. The SPP proposed five points:

  1. Commission a study on the effects of public housing on the open market.
  2. Push the government to make public housing statistics and information available.
  3. De-link public housing prices from private housing market prices.
  4. Push for a balance between affordable housing and reserve building.
  5. Assert that the income gap can be mitigated through public housing program, though not at current prices.

The rally was more focused on generating buzz and rousing the crowd than proposing ideas. The speeches were more engaging than the previous night’s rally, perhaps as part of a shift in strategy. The adoration in the air was palpable. The rally, however, risks coming across as too shallow, by focusing on bashing the PAP and uplifting the candidates without actually delivering concrete ideas. This could signal a shift in the SPP’s strategy towards a more emotive-based form of campaigning. How well it works remains to be seen.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dengue cases shoot up by 29% after five weeks of decline

After five weeks of decline in the number of dengue cases recorded…

PM Lee Hsien Loong expresses shock over the news of Jakarta bombings

Singapore’s Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has expressed his shock and dismay…

鄞义林以香港公民社会为鉴 吁新加坡人莫忘为自己权益抗争

香港抗议游行造成了全球的连锁效应,甚至在我国也引发了热烈的讨论。 2019年,香港特别行政区政府提交香港立法会审议的一法律草案,以向中国大陆、澳门和台湾等司法管辖区移交嫌疑人和进行法律协助。此提案源于潘晓颖命案,现时香港法律无法向台湾移交疑犯,同时特区政府宣称原有逃犯移交条例不包括中国大陆及澳门亦是「法律缺陷及漏洞」。草案甫经提出,便招致社会各方质疑和关切香港作为独立司法管辖区的独立性或遭削弱,甚至批评草案是对“一国两制”致命的冲击。 而目前旅居台湾的维权人士鄞义林,周一(17日)在脸书上,表达对香港抗议活动的看法,以及它对于新加坡的启示。 文中指出,香港反送中集会,反而促使港人同仇敌忾。远在香港发生的大事,也引起了新加坡人对示威的关注与非议,大致分为两派:忧虑新加坡是否会在未来发生动荡,又或者希望本土人民也能团结站出来抗争。 他写道,“ 一派的看法,非常忧虑示威行动所带来的骨牌效应,担心新加坡也会发生同样的示威行动。而这一派的留言者,通常都是新加坡政治制度下的受惠者,你会从他们的留言中听到”新加坡是非常好的地方、新加坡非常长稳定,我们不应该在如此美好的国家发生这样的暴动。“ 另一方面,他指出,“ 另一派的看法,则来自于被新加坡政治制度遗忘的人,这些人他们觉得被抛弃,或曾经被新加坡所伤害过。他续指,“这些人从香港示威行动中再次燃起希望,为自己的权益和自主抗争到底。” 鄞义林阐述,此次示威行动成功,不仅仅是对香港人民非常重要,更是给与那些对专制制度感到无力的人新希望,认为我们也有可能走向这一步。 他解释,那些所谓要保住“新加坡良好制度”的人,无疑都是受惠的一方,他们想要守住在这个制度下所获得的威望与利益。他们也知道,如果新加坡变成更平等的国家,他们的利益和威望也相对不保。 他也在文中说道,他仅仅是简单撰述示威行动的现况,但他表示香港的示威行动也引起了两端的争议,“受惠者的恐惧,以及边缘化者的希望“,并认为这是去向更平等的世界有必要经历的过程。 然而,他感慨认为,人民无法从香港示威行动中得到学习,也没有意愿将新加坡变成更接近平等的地方。鄞义林说,“…

Why are we pushing for an even bigger population? – SDP on train breakdown

The Singapore Democratic Party has voiced out about the recent train breakdown,…