The following was first published as a blog post by Kirsten Han.

Kirsten Han/

Colourful mushrooms? (Image from mobileapples.com)

 

As Singapore is wrapped up in the middle of what is widely seen to be a “watershed election”, we begin to see many, many instances of fear-mongering. Warnings of “freak elections”, despite the fact that there is no such thing in real democratic countries. Analogies of driving cars, and car crashes. Mentions of violent quarrels in Parliament with chairs being thrown. Threats of not getting any upgrading in your neighbourhood estates. Accusations of our precious reserves being “raided”. Even Mr Lui Tuck Yew has come forward with a thinly-veiled and highly inept analogy aboutnice shady trees and poisonous colourful mushrooms, possibly the closest he has come to being “artistic” in all his years as the Minister of Information, Communication and the Arts.

Yesterday, our Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew came forward to say that the voters of Aljunied GRC would “regret it” if they voted for the Workers’ Party. Again, he pointed out that the WP team had “little track record” compared to the PAP. He also said that the residents of Aljunied GRC would have 5 years to “repent” voting for WP, because they would learn that the PAP would always take care of PAP constituencies first. So much for serving all Singaporeans.

As a young Singaporean, and a first-time voter, I have had enough of this. I have already had a lifetime of fear instilled in me: you might fail your exams and never find a good job, don’t speak, don’t question, don’t get in trouble. I am not taking any more. I am too young to be so afraid.

If the Singaporeans of the 1960s had been so fearful and so concerned about “track record”, we would not be where we are today. Lee Kuan Yew and the PAP would not be where they are today. This city, Singapore as it is today, is a testament to what Singaporeans have achieved – and we did not achieve all this because we were afraid.

I wish the PAP would stop with their fear-mongering. They aren’t doing themselves any favours. It makes them look like the alternative parties have got them on the run, like they have nothing left but to fling threats and doomsday scenarios at the electorate. With the complicit mainstream media to help them propagate these baseless fears, it is sneaky and dishonourable, and does not reflect well on the maturity of the PAP.

I used to live my life afraid. When I was packing up my bags in New Zealand ready to move back home, I remember saying to my friend that I did not want to say or do anything against the government because I am too young to get in trouble and “burn bridges”.

Image from venisebala on Flickr

Then I came home and found out about the homeless, the aunties and uncles collecting cardboard, working day-in day-out when they should have been enjoying the fruits of a lifetime’s labour. I read about the skyrocketing housing prices, the new young families unable to have homes of their own. The people who lose their life savings just because of one surgery, one hospital stay. And I watched, as our Ministers (all of them PAP) blew budgets, allowed terrorists to escape, brushed floods off as “once in 50 years”… then told Singaporeans to not complain so much, and gave themselves fat, hefty bonuses on top of their already-inflated paychecks. There was very little I, along with fellow Singaporeans, could do to protest this – because the PAP government has also passed legislation that restricts our freedom of assembly, association and expression.

When I saw all these things, I realised that I was wrong. I was wrong to have said, “I am too young to get in trouble.”

I should have said, “I am too young to bury my head in the sand.” I am too young to live my life dismissed as mere “noise” on the Internet.

I am not saying that I am not scared any more. I am. When I join campaigns, when I openly support the opposition and when I write entries and articles criticising the PAP, I still have worry and anxiety that I deal with. No matter what I do, there are still mental hurdles that I have to overcome.

But I will not be intimidated and fear-mongered into backing down from doing what I believe is right. Not anymore.

I have seen the effects of the PAP government’s policies. I have seen what happens when there are no alternative voices in Parliament to speak up, to raise debates and to force the government to reconsider and re-evaluate policies. I have seen the people who are suffering the effects of these policies, who are unable to have their own home, or afford three meals a day to feed their families.

It is true, there is no guarantee that the alternative parties will really be able to deliver. They have no “track record” that we can examine. By voting them in, we are taking a chance.

But we will be taking a chance anyway. How do you know, when you vote PAP, that the housing prices will not continue to skyrocket, that the wages of the lower-income will not continue to be suppressed, that sick people will not continue to be bankrupted by healthcare? How do you know, when you vote PAP, that they will fix all these problems, be accountable and start to connect with the people?

There is no “safe” vote. There are no real guarantees. We cannot know for sure how the next 5 years will turn out.

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results.”

Have you heard/read this quote before? I believe that it is true. We have already seen how things are under the PAP: how people are suffering, how help is not forthcoming, how the Ministers pay themselves with no accountability. Can you say that things have been fantastic for all Singaporeans in the past 5 years? Can you say that it could not have been any better?

Insanity is voting for the same party over and over again, and expecting things to be different.

I cannot tolerate all this fear-mongering from the incumbent. I cannot tolerate all this bullying and gerrymandering. I cannot tolerate being just “noise” in my own country, bossed about by holier-than-thou Ministers who don’t understand the sort of lives and problems that normal Singaporeans face.

I believe that there needs to be a change, and I stand by my belief. I will not stand for all this fear-mongering to try to get me to back down.

I am Singaporean. It is my right to have a say in where my country is heading for the next 5 years, and I will vote according to what I believe is best for my country’s future. I will not give in to fear, and I hope you won’t too.

If they want to keep talking about “freak elections”, then let’s get freaky.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

我国驻美大使:处理客工宿舍疫情不尽理想,惟政府决心吸取教训

我国驻美大使米尔普(Ashok Kumar Mirpuri)表示,纵使我国在应对大量的客工宿舍感染问题不尽理想,但政府决心吸取教训,并将在疫情结束后进行全面检讨。 日前,针对我国处理客工宿舍的课题,自由新闻工作者韩俐颖曾投书美国时政杂志《外交政策》(Foreign Policy),批评政府以“功利主义,非人性化”的角度在处理客工宿舍问题,并列举部分措施例如将部分客工宿舍以“封锁”(lockdown)形容;部分客工也曾投诉房间难以忍受的闷热;宿舍内的膳食问题等。 称政府关心客工福利 随后米尔普也致函至《外交政策》的总编辑回应此事,米尔普阐述,文章所指存在扭曲事实。政府向来致力于关心客工的福利,例如在隔离期间为客工提供膳食和网络服务,甚至在斋戒月期间,穆斯利客工能够在黎明前取得食物,让他们可以准时进行宗教活动。 此外,政府亦采取三管齐下的策略,即一,采取社交距离措施;二,安排医护人员到现场援助;三,对客工实施检测。另一方面,政府向雇主提供支援,让客工能够持续获得工资,并作出安排让他们能够汇钱给家人。 事实上,外籍客工也认可和感谢我国所作的努力;驻外使节也认为,我国控制客工宿舍疫情的举措透明。 我国驻美国大使馆在网站发布米尔普里的信函,并指《外交政策》拒绝刊登有关信函内容。

"CPF is your money": Tan Chuan Jin

The following is a blog post by the Minister for Manpower, Tan…

独乐乐不如众乐乐 女子与耄耋共庆生

施比受更有福,一名女子办生日庆祝会,与会者不只有朋友,更邀请了众多年长者参与。 一名女子安琪拉(Angela)欢庆36岁生日,但也为耄耋们带来欢笑声,刚在周日(11月10日)下午5时,在循环路(Circuit Road)第42座组屋楼下举办的生日会,也在Instagram上分享生日会的欢乐照片和视频。 据了解,寿星安琪拉曾在该区居住,反映该区有不少独居年长者。她一年会组织约四次类似聚会,让有兴趣的年长者们参与他发起组织的活动,“让老人们能到这里相聚后互相交流”。 善良的安琪拉,还曾分配家庭必需品给年长者们,让这些长辈到该集合地领取后回家。“那是六、七年前的事情了,过后我就一直这样做了。” 她感慨这些年长者们独居,也担心万一发生了什么事情,也没有人知道他们的处境。 安琪拉自费办聚餐,虽然只是简单的自由餐,“但看到他们能够开心、快乐地享受,我就感到非常满足了。”   View this post on…

网民分享印佣哭诉“一天只吃一餐” 人力部介入调查

上周,名为“春明”的网民上载一则视频,视频中一名名为Castina的印尼籍家庭帮佣,申诉她的雇主一天只让他吃一餐,而且睡眠不足,每天清晨五点就得起床工作,否则要扣工资。 这名女佣以泪洗面,除了一天只能吃上一顿饭,如果雇主家人生病,她也要被扣工资!因为雇主指她带来病菌。 此外,周末她也不被允许外出,只能呆在家;雇主也不让她拨打电话给家人联系。由于感到被雇主威胁,Castina希望人力部协助。 至于人力部在昨日于官方脸书发文证实有关个案,并表示已介入调查,而目前有关女佣已暂时迁至印尼使馆暂居。 人力部提醒,确保女佣每日至少三餐,是雇主的责任;二人和面对福利待遇问题的外籍女佣,都可致电人力部热线1800 339 5505申诉。