by Khairulanwar Zaini/ photos by Jean Loo, Aaron Lim and Jing Quan

 

A member of the public waves the Worker's Party flag in the air/ Jean Loo

With their gunsights sharply trained on Aljunied, the Workers’ Party’s charm offensive has begun in earnest.

The party returned to Serangoon Stadium, the site of their memorable final electoral rally in 2006. That campaign concluded with a pledge recital led by party chairperson Sylvia Lim, but even that rhetorical flourish was insufficient to secure a victory then. In a candid post-election assessment, secretary-general Low Thia Khiang admitted that the party’s failure to court the minority vote – particularly the high concentration of Malay residents in the Eunos ward – was its Achilles heel. The party had to find the means to engage the Malay community, and do it fast. Last night, they may have just found the right man.

Faisal Abdul Manap (for Aljunied GRC) began his speech apologising for a sore throat (‘it’s okay, bang!’ an audience member reassured him.) But if that minor affliction was affecting him, it was not discernable. In the party’s only Malay speech for the night, Faisal burst forth with an oratorical ebullience that one would rather expect from a veteran religious speechmaker.

Assalamualaikum!’ he said, employing the usual Muslim greeting of peace. The predominantly Chinese audience enthusiastically tried to reply in kind. He grinned before quipping, ‘I’m so proud to have a lot of Muslims here!’

The 35-year old family counsellor addressed his prospective voters with a pantun: ‘Buah duku, buah laici/ lebih enak buah durian/ Mohd Faisal nama diberi/ rahmatan lil ‘alamin jadi prinsip kehidipuan!’ This lyrical introduction was greeted with applause from the audience – and it did not really matter if they did not understand. His sincerity transcended language: Faisal was calling for the blessing and mercy for all mankind. Criticising the ruling party for its ‘lack of human touch’, he reiterated this humanistic streak with his calls to develop ‘more family-oriented public policy’ and a ‘more humane and caring society’.

There is a sense that he was speaking to an invisible audience. Less a sale of the Workers’ Party than an offer of friendship and a request for trust, his candidate-centric stump speech that diverges from the party’s modus operandi clues us into an important set-piece encounter between him and the incumbent’s Zainul Abidin Rasheed. The hearts (and voting slips) of the Malay community are at stake. And the outcome of this duel will spell important ramifications for the party’s fortunes in their second Battle of Aljunied.

***

To complement Faisal’s tactical engagement, the party has embarked upon a strategy of concentrating their formidable firepower on George Yeo, the anchor minister in the PAP’s slate of candidates. Earlier in the day, the mainstream press had carried his criticisms of the party’s Aljunied wager. They have placed ‘a burden on Aljunied GRC … to look after the larger interest of the opposition’, alleged Yeo. He said that creating such an ‘emotional dilemma’ is very much ‘against the spirit of democracy’. And taking issue with the declaration that voters will serve as the party’s ‘secret weapon’, he further accused them of reducing the electorate into ‘instruments to be chosen or discarded’.

In his own gentle and reassuring manner, crowd favourite Chen Show Mao rubbished these claims of ‘a special burden’. Chen urged the Aljunied residents to go ahead and look after themselves and their interests. They would not need to sacrifice their interests for the cause of a larger opposition – because ‘you will be better off if you vote the Workers’ Party,’ promised Chen. For the ‘emotional dilemma’ that Yeo had alluded to, Chen’s advice was to ‘take heart, have courage, but most importantly, use your head before you vote.’

But party chiefs Sylvia Lim and Low Thia Khiang were more severe with their rebukes. Later that night, Lim wryly noted that the ruling party was the one which had exploited the electorate for its own political purposes: ‘If the PAP respects the wishes of the voters, why does it keep redrawing boundaries based on election results?’ Pointing to the residents of Kaki Bukit, who had been displaced from Eunos to Marine Parade before being reshuffled into Aljunied, she asked, ‘Who is the one using voters as instruments to be chosen or discarded?’

These gerrymandering exercises make a mockery of Yeo’s claims. In his speech, Low claimed that the ruling party was using the group representative constituency system to arrest the vote swing against them. Speaking of his first electoral contest in Tiong Bahru GRC, he described how the opposition-leaning wards of Anson and Radin Mas were consolidated with an incumbent-friendly one to neuter any opposition advantage. He also criticised the PAP for deviating from the original three-member constituency structure of 1988 to the present four- to six-member ward. Low likened the GRC system to ‘a rubber band’: not only is its numbers malleable, it can also ‘stretch from Marine Parade to Hougang!’

‘There is nothing more against the spirit of democracy than the GRC!’ declared Low.

The fifth candidate in the party’s Aljunied slate, Pritam Singh, used his maiden rally speech to dispel concerns over the future of the foreign ministry should George Yeo be defeated. For him, the answer was simple: ‘another PAP MP will become the FM lor’. He assured the civil servants that the loss of one minister will not jeopardise the operations of the civil service: ‘nobody is indispensable, everyone can be replaced’. He drove home his point with an analogy from English soccer, drawing applause from the appreciative crowd: ‘If Wayne Rooney does not play for Manchester United, does Manchester United collapse?’

But the most spirited salvo came from Sylvia Lim. Assuaging fears that Yeo’s talents would be ‘lost’ if Aljunied were to change hands, Lim insisted that his future remains ‘bright’ even in defeat: the government could easily place him in one of the many government-linked corporations or appoint him as an ambassador-at-large.

Her wit firing on all cylinders, she said, ‘So don’t think of voting for Workers’ Party as voting against George Yeo. Think of it as helping him into early retirement.’

***

The night may have been dominated by the Aljunied slugfest, but the party maintained their calls for a First World Parliament. Demands for oversight and accountability frequently featured, as the candidates excoriated the ruling party for the failures and gaffes of the preceding five years. And did the rally congregation thrive on these sharp barbs.

The audience was regaled when Png Eng Huat (for East Coast GRC) pithily mused that ‘when Mas Selamat escaped, the minister also escaped’. And if the candidates are raising their act on the podium as the campaign marches on, the crowd is matching them measure for measure. On the first rally night, the candidates had implored voters to give the party a ‘driving license’ to be the co-driver of the Singapore ‘vehicle’. This was literally heeded by one party supporter – a mock driving license designed on a giant placard appeared in the crowd last night. The crowd is indeed faithful, but the battle has grown: the senior minister and minister mentor has weighed in on this particular contest. This solidarity can only help the party as the election campaign enters into its third day.

To view pictures from all the rallies on Friday night, click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SG wants to live with Covid while Israel rethinks this strategy as death figure goes up

Last month (24 Jun), ministers Gan Kim Yong, Lawrence Wong and Ong…

If more S’poreans leave, country will be ‘depleted’, ‘shrunken’: PM Lee

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has once again raised a perennial problem…

唐振辉:反假新闻法案料明年上半年呈国会

律政暨卫生高级政务部长唐振辉透露,打击网络假消息的法案有望在明年上半年提呈国会。 在接受《亚洲新闻台》的访谈上,表示相关法案预料最早在明年上半年提交国会,以立法作为打击假新闻的手段之一。 唐振辉也是研究蓄意散播网络假消息特选委员会的成员。他在访谈中指出“假消息对民主制度的影响更为广泛,除了选举也对日常生活造成影响。” 他表示,政府将研究立法的必要性,以期打击那些在选举期间散播假消息的举动。 对于滥用“假新闻法”钳制言论自由的担忧,唐振辉则强调“良好、有效和有力的公共辩论不能相提并论。” 他补充,如果在公共辩论中混入假消息、或者由网络智能机器人、假账号来放大吹嘘假消息,结果就会变成泛泛空谈,绝不是有效的公共讨论。 然而,根据本社的观察,不论在中英文社交媒体,却有更多的假账号似乎采取亲行动党的立场,在公共议题的辩论上,捍卫政府政策。 我国总理在今年11月,指出明年举行选举“一切都有可能”;11月23日,人民行动党公布中央执行委员会完整名单,财政部长王瑞杰任第一助理秘书长,贸工部长陈振声任第二助理秘书长,加紧交棒第四代领导人的步伐。 马国选前匆匆通过假新闻法 今年509第十四届全国大选前,马国前朝政府于四月匆匆通过了2018年假新闻法。马国默迪卡民调研究中心形容,这是国阵政府在选前的“临时抱佛脚”,却无阻国阵60年政权倒台的命运。 新政府上任后,即废除《假新闻法》,声称现有法律已足够应对假消息传播的问题,例如1998年通讯与多媒体法等。 在今年8月16日的国会辩论中,首相署部长哈尼法在回应国阵议员阿莎丽娜的提问时,哈尼法指出,警察和其他相关执法机构理应扮演更重要角色,来应对假消息散播的问题。…

What is Tony Tan doing on Tan Jee Say’s page?

What is a picture of a smiling Tony Tan doing on a…