The following is sent to us by a TOC reader.

Tan Hui Min/

photo credit: Aaron Lim at Worker’s Party rally at Serangoon Stadium on 29 April

GE is always an exciting time – it is the time we find Singaporeans, young and old, gathered at public spaces to listen to debates intently and wear their patriotism for Singapore on their sleeves.

This GE, “fear” has been a running theme. The incumbents have warned the dangers of a freak election, possibilities of losing talented MPs and questioned the opposition’s ability to deliver on their promises. The opposition has asked the people to be unafraid to stand up for change and to think about the long-term consequences of having a one-party system. Incumbents and opposition alike have asked voters to consider how each party will use their parlimentary presence to advance their partisan interests.

Should we fear a freak election? Maybe, but what is the definition of a “freak election”? To many, the worst-case scenario is a politically diverse parliament with loss of incumbent office bearers. Yet, a politically homogenous parliament, which can well qualify as a “freak election”, is perceived as an acceptable result of GE2011.

As voters mull over their choices, should we fear a politically diverse parliament? To put things in perspective, we never had a politically diverse parliament since independence. Fears arising from this possibility are likely to be imagined because we have never experienced it. If we have an extremely efficient and capable party-neutral Civil Service, safety nets will be in place should any party tries to capitalise on their parliamentary presence. In fact, a politically diverse parliament itself is another check to prevent individual parties from profiteering at the expense of national interests. A common imagined fear is how political parties cannot agree on ideas. Naturally, we will find it difficult to agree with bad ideas. However, it is hard to imagine how we cannot agree on good ideas that are Pro-Singapore. Shouldn’t partisan interests be national interests?

Fear can be destructive or constructive. Will we let our imagined fears destroy the benefits of having alternative voices in the parliament or will we fear the under-representation of voices? Constructive changes can be effected surely and carefully by electing good and high-calibre opposition candidates to allow them to make good their promises. The opposition needs a chance to prove themselves. Do we want to fear the unknown and never know the capabilities of the unknowns? Like the incumbents, elected opposition MPs too will be accountable and supported by the people of Singapore. Won’t the incumbents make sure there are balance and checks on the policies which opposition MPs propose?

Every Singaporean has a stake in this country. Is it regretable that Singaporeans ask for more balance and checks within the government? Should greater accountabilty and transparency be feared by the people of Singapore?

To borrow a story from Mr Chen Show Mao, Singapore is on a journey to improve governance to improve Singaporeans’ quality of life. As citizens of the Lion City, roar courageously with your head and heart. Fear not.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Ho Ching gets May Day award

Award given to Temasek’s ex-CEO for “contributions to the labour movement”.

不满淡马锡聘雇方式 何晶:投诉人力部啊!

淡马锡控股首席执行员何晶,怒斥恶意起底该集团雇员的行径,指责这是“胆小鬼的仇恨行为”,也挑战若有人对该集团的聘雇方式有意见,应通过正当管道,投诉到人力部等监管机构。 她也指出,如果基于事实而不是谣言或揣测,当然可以控诉不公平的雇佣问题,但她不接受恶意的抹黑或起底的行为,和作出不实指控。 “最好就是重新培训、提高技能,来适应瞬息万变的世界。不要被任何试图挑起种族歧视的有心人所愚弄。” 事缘日前社交媒体突然广传贴文,质问为何淡马锡集团聘请外籍雇员,也公开他们的照片和履历。这迫使淡马锡在本月14日发表文告并投诉给脸书,认为这些流传社交媒体的贴文,已因为仇恨言论违反脸书社群守则。 网民:难道新加坡教育培育不出人才? 不过,仍有不少网民在何晶的脸书留言,质问难道我们的教育系统,无法培育出业界特别是银行业所需的人才?有者也指出,仅有少数外籍雇员,民众自然不会过问。但有不少参与国民服役的国人,无法找到工作,民间的焦虑是需要去解决的。 就在前日,一位退休银行家敢敢发文,揭露过去20年,不少在新加坡金融领域的外籍人士,担任中高级管理职位。 “一些大型、老牌外籍银行,倾向雇用外籍人士、排挤新加坡人才,已是业界熟知之事。我呼吁当局应严密审查金融领域的这种现象。” 促通过正当管道提出投诉 在脸书上粗略翻查的话,不难发现有关淡马锡员工的类似帖文。脸书之前已删除了部分,被淡马锡控股标记为违反仇恨言论社区准则的帖文。 “讨厌一个国籍到一个族群的距离非常短,且很快地,将变成针对所有不一样的人。” 她呼吁民众适应新环境条件,“这需要我们每个人都意识到,我们必须不断努力变得更好并且更适应”…

Former academic Donald Low: Root of elitism in Singapore lies not in “lack of empathy” amongst Singaporeans, but inherently elitist “government policies”

Former academic Donald Low has argued that elitism in Singapore is not…