Steffen Toh /

I cringed when I read Minister George Yeo’s words describing how the Workers’ Party is forcing the voters in Aljunied to shoulder the heavy ‘emotional burden’ of ensuring the opposition gets a substantial voice in the Parliament. Residents there feel ‘uncomfortable’, he says, that they have to choose between ‘enlightened self-interest’ and the ‘opposition’s interests’. His words make me, a Singaporean citizen, uncomfortable on many levels.

It was all so different just days before, when on Nomination Day, Minister Yeo declared the WP team that his PAP team would be coming up against as ‘worthy opponents’. Yes, I thought: finally, here was a member of the ruling party who is able to transcend party rhetoric and see the quantum leap forward of the quality and quantity of opposition candidates for what it is – a maturing of the Singaporean people and a positive development for our nation. I mistakenly believed that he was acknowledging that Singaporeans are finally stirring from a self-imposed and apathetic lethargy. He sees, I thought, that we are no longer content to just sit back and allow the government to take us where they think we should go; that we have ideas concerning what our destination should be and how to get there; that we are ready to step forward to actively help craft the future of our nation together.

Unfortunately, this admiration was short-lived, and quickly turned into disappointment with Minister Yeo’s latest words. It’s not just that the phrase ‘enlightened self-interest’ contains an apparent contradiction – if the voters of Aljunied are ‘enlightened’, their concerns would go beyond an immediate and selfish consideration of their own needs, to include a consideration of the needs of the wider community, and indeed, the nation. It is almost like Minister Yeo is trying to justify what is essentially a selfish act, to think about one’s self-interest in casting a vote, by portraying it as something noble.

Secondly, it’s also the fact that the residents are falsely presented with the picture that if they vote for the opposition, they would be damaging their own interests. Who says that the two must be mutually exclusive? In fact, the WP’s message emphasizes the opposite consistently. Vote with us, so that we can enter Parliament and protect your interests.

Finally, what really saddens me is the ‘emotional burden’ argument, because it makes me question the extent to which we have departed from the visions that originally emboldened our founding fathers to take the building of Singapore’s future into their own hands. The bottom-line is this: In a truly democratic society, every single vote that is cast MUST carry with it an ‘emotional burden’. That is the essence of a society in which its people are active players in their collective future. Each vote carries an emotional burden, each vote should make the person casting it ‘uncomfortable’, because each vote is supposed to count towards something, and not to be taken lightly.

And the truth is, for far too long, Singaporeans have had this ‘emotional burden’ removed from them, because of one, the presence of an admittedly outstanding government that takes care of all of our needs, and two, the lack of a viable alternative. For far too long, when it comes to elections and voting, Singaporeans have proceeded on auto-pilot, and have not had to grapple with the significance that each vote carries. For too long, we have abdicated from our duty to consider the importance of every vote before casting it.

And for the first time, there is the presence of a viable alternative to the ruling party. For the first time, there are able Singaporeans who care enough to leave their well-paying jobs or step out of their comfort zones to go up against the PAP juggernaut. For the first time, we have opposition candidates, spread out across different parties, that impress us with their passion, sincerity, and credentials, but none more so then at ‘hotspots’ like Aljunied GRC. That is why the Aljunied residents feel uncomfortable, because they can no longer dismiss the opposition as riff-raff. This is a positive change, a change that has finally put the burden back on Singaporeans as they consider who to vote for. And every Singaporean, whether you are in Aljunied or indeed, Tanjong Pagar, should rejoice at this.

Picture from msn news.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

苏睿勇起诉田总诽谤

新加坡马拉松好手苏睿勇,今早在脸书分享将入禀法庭起诉新加坡田径总会。 “尽管我已尽力去达致共识,不过我和田总的调解失败了。我的律师已把传票令状(Writ of Summons)和诽谤诉状寄至田总处。但我仍崇敬会长邓永辉,我感到他有善良的心。” 不过,他强调仍需还他一个清白,并且让国内体育界人士清楚,如果要公开谴责一位运动员,也要有理有据,否则就应被追究责任。 事发于今年8月2日,田总对苏睿勇提出了一些指控,指他们注意到有马拉松运动员作出一系列据称“有违运动员行为准则”的行为,但是没有提供有关的细节解说。 对此,苏睿勇发律师信函予两协会高层,即马利克和奥委会秘书长陈志荣,8月13日下午5时前给出具体解释,详细解释“行为失当”的指控。 田总于13日回复苏睿勇的律师信函,前者称体愿以“无偏见会面”进行调解,但是苏表示,“他们没有为诽谤指控提供依据,或者澄清他们在此事件中的立场,试图在作出诽谤性指控后暗地解决”。 接着,苏睿勇于14日再次对田总发出律师信函,要求对有关指控作出澄清;8月20日,他表示决定给新加坡田径总会(SA)一个机会,并且愿意和对方见面,但田总执行董事马利克(Malik Aljunied)除外。 不过,显然在9月6日的见面,双方并无法达成共识。

经济师预测 第二季经济年比将萎缩11.8巴仙

新加坡金融管理局发布最新经济师调查报告,指经济师预测今年第二季将年比萎缩11.巴仙。与此同时,今年经济增长预测,也下调到萎缩5.8巴仙。 这比起上一次调查的0.6巴仙预测还要低。 25名受访经济师,预测今年经济增长,可能萎缩介于4.1至6巴仙,但预计明年回弹4.8巴仙。 贸工部早前已下调对今年的经济预测,预计今年经济萎缩4至7巴仙。 冠状病毒19疫情在全球仍未消退,全球经济前景仍不明朗,相信这也致使当局决定下调今年的经济增长预测。  

Shouldn't the injured be transported to the nearest hospital by ambulances?

A tragic accident took place near Lucky Plaza whereby two people tragically…

What are Mr Lui's view on SIA's A380s?

~by: Ghui~ On Friday, 6 January 2012, Singapore Airlines and Qantas Airways…