Steffen Toh /

I cringed when I read Minister George Yeo’s words describing how the Workers’ Party is forcing the voters in Aljunied to shoulder the heavy ‘emotional burden’ of ensuring the opposition gets a substantial voice in the Parliament. Residents there feel ‘uncomfortable’, he says, that they have to choose between ‘enlightened self-interest’ and the ‘opposition’s interests’. His words make me, a Singaporean citizen, uncomfortable on many levels.

It was all so different just days before, when on Nomination Day, Minister Yeo declared the WP team that his PAP team would be coming up against as ‘worthy opponents’. Yes, I thought: finally, here was a member of the ruling party who is able to transcend party rhetoric and see the quantum leap forward of the quality and quantity of opposition candidates for what it is – a maturing of the Singaporean people and a positive development for our nation. I mistakenly believed that he was acknowledging that Singaporeans are finally stirring from a self-imposed and apathetic lethargy. He sees, I thought, that we are no longer content to just sit back and allow the government to take us where they think we should go; that we have ideas concerning what our destination should be and how to get there; that we are ready to step forward to actively help craft the future of our nation together.

Unfortunately, this admiration was short-lived, and quickly turned into disappointment with Minister Yeo’s latest words. It’s not just that the phrase ‘enlightened self-interest’ contains an apparent contradiction – if the voters of Aljunied are ‘enlightened’, their concerns would go beyond an immediate and selfish consideration of their own needs, to include a consideration of the needs of the wider community, and indeed, the nation. It is almost like Minister Yeo is trying to justify what is essentially a selfish act, to think about one’s self-interest in casting a vote, by portraying it as something noble.

Secondly, it’s also the fact that the residents are falsely presented with the picture that if they vote for the opposition, they would be damaging their own interests. Who says that the two must be mutually exclusive? In fact, the WP’s message emphasizes the opposite consistently. Vote with us, so that we can enter Parliament and protect your interests.

Finally, what really saddens me is the ‘emotional burden’ argument, because it makes me question the extent to which we have departed from the visions that originally emboldened our founding fathers to take the building of Singapore’s future into their own hands. The bottom-line is this: In a truly democratic society, every single vote that is cast MUST carry with it an ‘emotional burden’. That is the essence of a society in which its people are active players in their collective future. Each vote carries an emotional burden, each vote should make the person casting it ‘uncomfortable’, because each vote is supposed to count towards something, and not to be taken lightly.

And the truth is, for far too long, Singaporeans have had this ‘emotional burden’ removed from them, because of one, the presence of an admittedly outstanding government that takes care of all of our needs, and two, the lack of a viable alternative. For far too long, when it comes to elections and voting, Singaporeans have proceeded on auto-pilot, and have not had to grapple with the significance that each vote carries. For too long, we have abdicated from our duty to consider the importance of every vote before casting it.

And for the first time, there is the presence of a viable alternative to the ruling party. For the first time, there are able Singaporeans who care enough to leave their well-paying jobs or step out of their comfort zones to go up against the PAP juggernaut. For the first time, we have opposition candidates, spread out across different parties, that impress us with their passion, sincerity, and credentials, but none more so then at ‘hotspots’ like Aljunied GRC. That is why the Aljunied residents feel uncomfortable, because they can no longer dismiss the opposition as riff-raff. This is a positive change, a change that has finally put the burden back on Singaporeans as they consider who to vote for. And every Singaporean, whether you are in Aljunied or indeed, Tanjong Pagar, should rejoice at this.

Picture from msn news.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

装摄像机德士是交警“间谍”? 警方驳斥不属实

据了解,社交媒体流传一则贴文,指一辆车顶装有摄像机的德士,是属于交通警察的车辆,不过警方于昨晚发文驳斥,这并不属实。 警方称,经与康福德高德士求证,才得知照片中的德士,暂时装上摄像机作为培训用途。警方也呼吁转发信息宜谨慎,避免传发未经证实消息。

淡滨尼商场电扶梯故障:疑遭婴儿推车轮子卡住

淡滨尼购物商场Tampines 1的电动手扶梯发生爆裂事件,该商场总经理表示,或是因为婴儿推车的轮子卡住手扶梯踏板,而引起踏板移位,启动了手扶梯的安全模式,使手扶梯停止运作。 根据目击者指出,有关的手扶梯发生“巨响”前,的确有公众推着婴儿推车搭着该手扶梯下楼。 目击者吴先生是于周末晚上,在脸书上载了该商场手扶梯故障的照片。在一家商店的他随后接受《8视界》访问时指出,他当时突然听到金属所发出的巨响,就见手扶梯的铁踏板弹出,就好似发生了小型地震。 他也表示,当时有一家人扶着婴儿推车搭电动手扶梯下楼,惟,在他们离开电动扶梯后,扶梯就坏了,小孩还被吓哭了。 该商场总经理Maggie Chua在回应有关事件时表示,手扶梯的安全模式被启动,或是被婴儿推车轮子卡住踏板所致。 她也指出,从闭路电视画面也可见在事发前,有一辆未折叠的婴儿推车自该电动扶梯上下来。 她表示,虽然并未接到任何受伤事故报告,但是商场选择停止运作该手扶梯,以便进行安全评估。“建设局也在第一时间接到了通知。我们也与各方紧密合作彻查此事,包括电动手扶梯供应商OTIS。” 她补充说,AsiaMalls承诺继续持维护该社区的安全。 婴儿推车搭手扶梯属危险行为 另外,建设局于15日回应《8视界》询问时指出,2017年至2018年间,当局平均每年接到4起与婴儿推车相关的手扶梯事故,包括导致手扶梯损坏,有人因而受伤等。据当局2018年代数据显示,2016年和2017年期间,每月平均有30起与手扶梯有关的意外事故,几乎都是因为使用者的使用方式不正确所致。…

122 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 47 cases linked to Bugis Junction cluster, 26 unlinked

As of Friday noon (27 Aug), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…