Lisa Li / photos by Kirsten Han

Mr J.B Jeyaretnam was never far from everyone’s minds at the Reform Party’s first rally at Clementi Stadium, which saw a crowd of more than a thousand. “Wake up to your rights as a human being!” the MC thundered, echoing Mr JBJ, independent Singapore’s first opposition politician and founder of the Reform Party (RP). “If you want alternative voices, go to the other political parties,” the MC added, “We intend to be the next government!” The crowd cheered.

This brand of gung-ho ambition was evident in the speeches of RP’s West Coast GRC team, comprising Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam, Mr Kumar Appavoo, Ms Ho Soak Harn, Mr Frankie Low and Mr Andy Zhu.

The first speaker was Ms Ho Soak Harn. She thanked RP members and volunteers, before moving on to familiar problems – crowded trains, jobs going to foreigners instead of Singaporeans, increases in rent and housing prices, GST increases, silence on Temasek losses. “No more!” she declared. “We don’t need a government where the rich and elite come first, and everyone else comes last!”

Ms Ho also told the crowd that RP wants to measure progress differently: not by the profits of casinos for example, but by whether people can get a job, pay the bills and have money to save, by being able to help residents forced out of homes. The party wants an education system that is not about rote learning, but about creativity, one that develops a child to his full potential, she added.

The second speaker, Mr Frankie Low, spoke of the inadequacies of the CPF scheme and assistance for the elderly, as well as Singapore’s immigration policy. “Why do we need 6.5 million people?” he asked. “Are there enough jobs for all?” He questioned if the ministers understood the impact of their “mindless and hasty” policy, given that they “don’t need public transport, and get VIP treatment in hospital”. There were “too many too soon” due to lack of restrictions, infrastructure was inadequate, and PRs did not have to do National Service, he pointed out. The RP’s solution? To give PR status to only the talented who can add value to Singapore.

RP’s Secretary-General, Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam, started on a humble note. “I hope I can earn your respect,” he told the crowd, adding that “competition in business leads to innovation and productivity; competition in politics will lead to better, and more intelligent politics.”

He pointed out that RP was the first to talk about the “hollowness of our performance”, that Singapore’s increase in GDP was due to cheap foreign labour even though real wages did not increase. It was only after the RP highlighted this that that the Government started on the Productivity Bill, focusing on raising real income for Singaporeans, he said.

Mr Jeyaretnam also listed some of RP’s plans. They would not bring down housing prices, but would build smaller flats for smaller families; they would also get HDB to release more land, introduce private sector competition to HDB, and give people the right to buy freehold HDB flats (instead of the current 99-year lease), thus allowing them to get the rise in value if a private developer wanted to buy the land.

RP would also push for  reform in CPF policy to let people decide what proportion of their income they wanted to save; they would also introduce a universal healthcare scheme, so that Singaporeans would not need to worry about exhausting their savings on healthcare.

The party would ensure minimum wage, reduce GST for essential items, have a more rational immigration policy, and push for Temasek and GIC to become more transparent, and have it put on the stock exchange for Singaporeans to own shares of it. They would also cut down National Service to one year without compromising on its effectiveness.

The PAP had accused the opposition of wanting to “run the reserves into the ground”, but Mr Jeyaretnam pointed out that Singapore had $15 billion reserves – surely enough to fund some investment in education and healthcare. There would be transparent budgetary planning with RP, he added.

Mr Jeyaretnam summed up RP as a liberal party which believes in the market. It wants lower taxes, and foreign investment, and the removal of restrictions on the press to encourage innovation and creativity. He said unions should be democratically run, “with safeguards to prevent strikes without ballot of all union members being taken.”

“We aren’t going to be in government this elections, but we do intend to be the government one day,” he declared. “Singaporeans who want reform and change should join the RP!”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore Police Force issues stiff warning against former DBS employee over image depicting torn Singapore flag

The Singapore Police Force (SPF) has issued a stern warning against a…

“Durai Saga” fan fiction competition launched

By The Kentang “Patter”, an online web portal affiliated to The Straits…

律政部《防假消息法》指南范例:历史学者“J”推论冷藏行动未涉国安问题

《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》在今年5月正式在国会通过,并已在六月25日发布于宪报,正式生效。该法自提呈国会以来即备受争议,不仅在国会引起激辩,包括国内外学术界、媒体、公民组织等都已对该法提出质疑。 其中,本地历史学者覃炳鑫博士发现,律政部也有发布一份指南,以不同范例解释哪些情况下可援引《防假消息法》,例如哪些陈述属于意见,哪些是造假事实。 这份指南指出,可援引该法的条件包括出现虚假事实,以及涉及公众利益。其中一个栏目特别提出学术界研究例子,阐述什么情况下可能出现学者发表虚假陈述。 覃炳鑫博士曾受邀出席去年的国会特选委员会听证会,为如何应对网络假消息提供意见。期间,他因为提及1963年冷藏行动和1987年光谱逮捕行动,目的在于政治利益,而非国家安全问题,批评人民行动党和前总理李光耀,才是假新闻的散播者,引起律政部长尚穆根等人围剿。 覃炳鑫发现,上述指南陈列的其中一个学术界例子,是这样的: J,一名历史研究者,依据各种历史文件推论,指冷藏行动未涉及国家安全问题。 而后指南继续阐释: 针对(ix)的个案,假设J诠释历史文件,尔后又承认他的诠释是不准确的,然后又重复之前的误导性诠释,那么J就是做出了虚假事实陈述。 难道是如有雷同,纯属巧合?虽然上述案例没有指名道姓,但似乎在影射覃炳鑫博士的经历。对此覃博士只得在脸书自嘲:“如果你的政府拿专制立法特别针对你,那也算一种荣幸。” 不过,他也补充,事实是没有任何证据能表明,在冷藏行动下的拘留者涉及参与颠覆国家的共产党阴谋。 针对上世纪50、60年代期间,新加坡是否有共产主义阴谋散布?左翼份子是否受马共唆使企图进行不利新加坡的政治活动,才有必要进行逮捕行动,覃炳鑫在去年的听证会,和尚穆根等人展开六小时的审问拉锯战。 在过程中,尚穆根以“是或不是”、“同不同意”、“你有读过这些资料吗?”“对与否”等威权式的提问,无意与覃炳鑫对话,过度简化复杂的历史争议,其背后意图却是要质疑覃炳鑫历史研究的正当性和理据。…

Dr Yaacob’s incorrect and embarrassing New Zealand comparison

By Choo Zheng Xi/Co-Founder, TOC This morning, my eyes nearly popped out…