Andrew Loh

People’s Action Party (PAP) candidate for Holland-Bukit Timah Group Representation Constituency (GRC), Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, made comments about a YouTube video that would raise “awkward questions” for the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP). His comments were reported in the Sunday Times, 24 April.

Dr Balakrishnan and his team from the PAP are being challenged by the SDP team in the upcoming elections. The SDP team is led by Dr Vincent Wijeysingha, Mr Tan Jee Say, Mr Ang Yong Guan, and Ms Michelle Lee.

Following Dr Balakrishnan’s remarks, the SDP asked him to clarify the video he was referring to.

Today, Monday 25 April, Dr Balakrishnan and his GRC team issued a statement on the matter.

The PAP statement, which was undersigned by Dr Vivian Balakrishnan and candidates Liang Eng Hwa, Christopher de Souza and Sim Ann, reads as follows:

“A video has been posted on the internet showing Vincent Wijeysingha participating at a forum which discussed the promotion of the gay cause in Singapore.

“The discussion at the forum also touched on sex with boys and whether the age of consent for boys should be 14 years of age.

“In the video, Wijeysingha was introduced as being from the SDP.

“In addition to other comments, Wijeysingha stated: ‘I think the gay community has to rally ourselves. Perhaps one outcome of today’s forum would be, for those of us who are interested, to come together to further consider how we can address the 377 issue as well as further rights issues in relation to gays and lesbians.’

“We believe that candidates should be upfront about their political agenda and motives, so that voters are able to make an informed choice.

“The issue is not Wijeysingha’s sexual orientation. That is a matter for him.

“The video raises the question on whether Wijeysingha will now pursue this cause in the political arena and what is the SDP’s position on the matter.”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

财政部称增消费税提供更多社会支援,反驳“消费税影响低收入户”之言论说

上周一(8日),21岁的本科学生Marcus Aw Chen Feng ,在《海峡时报》论坛里发表一篇评论,对于2021至2025年,消费税即将调涨表达意见。 他写道,“消费税提高,意味着消费品也跟着水涨船高,包括生活必需品的柴米油盐酱醋茶,而其中受到最多影响的亦会是低收入户。他们收入分配上将会减少,亦可能会过得不开心。” “高税金会为经济成长带来负面的影响。生产成本的提高,会增加公司的负担,减低产业上的投资的金额,甚至导致生产链缩减,造成失业率的提升。 作者亦提及,调高消费税或带来高生产成本,可能会减低外国企业入驻新加坡的机率,驳斥“消费税的递增,能对有钱人征收更多税款”之说。 毫无怀疑的,若如Marcus所说,所有高薪部长和公务员将会被征收更多税务,而且不会有人喜欢被征收税务。 今日,财政部企业传播总监林云谦(译名,Lim Yuin Chien)于《海峡时报》的论坛中发表一篇《增加消费税旨在支付更多社会支出》驳斥Marcus的言论。…

Focus on Healthcare – Part 5: The problem with citizens paying more

Focus on Healthcare is a five-part series that provides a critical analysis…

狮城女在中国被判枪决 两律师愿襄助现一丝希望

男友携带毒品入境中国,本地女子阿兹琳达也被捕,并在当地法院被判处死刑判决。不过目前有两名义务律师愿意襄助,以争取在当地高等法庭重新检讨此案,阿兹琳达再现一丝生机。 阿兹琳达是在五年前被卷入毒品案,实则携带毒品的是她的男友,在抵达深圳后两人被捕。 人权律师拉维,在接受本地网络媒体《独立新加坡》采访时透露,目前有两名分别来自中国上海和香港的律师,表示愿意帮忙此案,不过有鉴于官司的敏感度,他们暂不便透露姓名身份。 拉维也指出,代表律师要造访狱中的阿兹琳达也遇到阻碍,但新加坡外交部正试图让驻中国领事馆协调所需的大量文件,以协助官司。 拉维了解到,目前阿兹琳达有两个申诉管道,一个是在广东的法院检讨此案,其二则是在中国最高法院。 早前,阿兹琳达的家人担忧她将面对死刑,拉维坦言,可以理解家属当时的焦虑,但如今焦虑的阴霾暂时排除,也希望当地律师团队能取得所需资料,在新加坡领事的协助下尽快见到阿兹琳达。 有中国律师索取天价费用 拉维在不久前接受CNN新闻台采访,也曾指出在中国聘请律师非常昂贵,有者甚至索取天价,阿兹琳达家属根本无力承担。 “我尝试与一些国际友人联络,找愿意无偿打官司的律师,但她的官司程序仍在进行,我们不知何时会到下个法院的阶段。” 但CNN报导出街后,很快就有律师愿意代表阿兹琳达出庭。 拉维曾就阿兹琳达的处境,致函询问外交部,后者也在去年12月25日答复,当局知晓此事,而新加坡驻广州领事,也对阿兹琳达与另名新加坡男子尤思礼( Mohd Yusri),提供领事协助。…

【冠状病毒19】蓝彬明代为接收 我国获中国赠60万口罩

雪中送炭,卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明感谢中国捐赠予我国50万个口罩和10万个KN95口罩。 蓝彬明今天在脸书上帖文指出,他代表我国卫生部,从驻我国中国大使洪小勇手中接过口罩,并对该国提供的人道主义援助表示由衷感谢。 他指出,新加坡和中国有着非常密切且长久的友谊,而在冠状病毒疫情爆发后,两国一直都互相支持帮助。在今年2月,我国也曾移交了诊断试剂盒和医疗用品给中国,以帮助该国的疫情控制。 他表示,在这抗疫期间所存在的互助和合作精神,非常重要,并表示会继续和中国保持密切合作,共同抗疫。