Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the reports “Foreign workers help create good jobs for S’poreans: PM” (Straits Times, 22 April) and “Foreign workers help to create more good jobs for Singaporeans: PM”.

The former states that:

“In his speech, Mr Lee [Hsien Loong] noted that six in 10 of the employees are ‘Singaporeans and permanent residents’. Singapore residents also take up two-thirds of the managerial and professional positions…”

Given the remarks at the end of the report – that the “Government’s foreign worker policy could emerge as a hot-button issue this election as some believe that it has hurt residents’ job prospects and depressed wages” –  I find it somewhat strange that even at this eleventh hour before the elections, the Prime Minister is still using “Singaporeans and permanent residents (PRs)” statistics.

How many Singaporeans?

The statement – “six in 10 of the employees are ‘Singaporeans and permanent residents’ – could mean just one Singaporean and five PRs.

As to “Singapore residents also take up two-thirds of the managerial and professional positions”, this could also be one-third Singaporeans and one-third PRs.

Also, according to the CNA report, since in “the technician and manufacturing jobs, two-thirds are foreign workers”, it could mean that as little as one per cent of the one-third are Singaporeans and the balance 99 per cent of the one-third PRs

Meaningless statistics?

So, the bottom line is that the PM’s statistics may not tell us much about jobs for Singaporeans, because of the 1,200 workers, 480 are foreigners, and as many as 716 could be PRs, with just one Singaporean manager, one Singaporean professional, one Singaporean technician and one Singaporean in a manufacturing job.

So, the $64,000 question may be – how many are Singaporeans?

To illustrate the frivolity of the data, if half the locals are PRs, it may mean that only 30 per cent of the total work force are Singaporeans, with one-third of the managers and professional positions and one-sixth of the technicians and manufacturing jobs being Singaporeans, respectively.

Surely, the data breaking down the locals into Singaporeans and PRs is available, as it is only 1,200 people who are all employed in just one company.

FM can, but PM can’t?

If the Finance Minister can present ‘Singaporean only’ workers’ incomes and ‘Singaporean only’ households incomes in the Budget statement in Parliament, albeit that it was one of the very rare occasions that “Singaporean only” statistics  were disclosed, why is it that the PM can’t now?

Well, your guess is as good as mine!

Employers can hire 100 per cent foreigners?

Under the Ministry of Manpower’s (MOM) employment policies, an employer may be able to hire entirely non-Singaporeans, because under the foreign worker quota rules, a company can have unlimited employment of permanent residents and employment pass holders, up to 25 per cent of S-pass workers and 50 per cent of Malaysian work permit holders in certain sectors like the services sector. For non-Malaysian work permit holders like those from China or India, the quota is much lower at generally 10 per cent.

To illustrate the above with some examples :–

–          a company can have 100 per cent PRs,

–          100 per cent employment pass holders,

–          100 per cent mixture of PRs and employment pass,

–          50 per cent PRs and employment pass, with 25 per cent S-pass, 15 per cent Malaysian work permit holders and 10 per cent China/India work permit holders, etc,

–          as well as an unlimited number of foreign university interns on typically six-months stay in Singapore, who do not need to be subject to any of the foreign worker quotas.

“Commentary and opinions are a dime a dozen – let the statistics do the talking!”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore president’s opening speech reflects what 4G leadership intends to do for their remaining term

Singapore’s President Halimah Yacob called for constructive dialogue and trust in government, addressing climate change and ensuring a more inclusive and open meritocracy. Analysts suggest Mdm Halimah’s speech aims to address the social divide and advocate for more initiatives to facilitate a broader and meritocratic society. However, since Mdm Halimah’s role is custodial and cannot advance her own policy agenda,, her speech should be deemed as a reflection of what the 4G leadership intends to do for their remaining term.

已探讨落实因素、替代方案 马国今年料废除煽动法

马来西亚政府预料在今年废除饱受当地维权组织挞伐的《1948年煽动法令》。 掌管法律事务的马国首相署部长拿督刘伟强在上周五出席希望联盟执政一周年,接受媒体访问时,如是指出。 他说,政府已经在内阁会议中议决,于今年内废除该法令,目前已经探讨需要加以落实的数项因素,并且取代该法令的新方式。 他指出,基于有关法令隶属内政部的管辖范围,所以也有该部门负责废除和设立替代方案的事项。 因此,他将会和其他的首相署部长,即掌管国民团结和社会和谐事务的华达慕迪、掌管宗教事务的拿督斯里姆加希博士,和通讯及多媒体部长哥宾星一起探讨新方案。 他指出,拟定新方案的内容,也包括了可能将诽谤或侮辱王室和政府领导人的公共秩序者,纳入刑事法典处理等。但是,他补充说,会确保国人继续享有言论自由。 “我们要确保,并不一定是所有的言论并不一定是所有的言论都构成煽动,因为我们要确保特定的言论可享有一些的自由……但我们不是在允许所有人恣意的诽谤我们的君主和领袖。” 他也表示,希盟政府其实不介意人民批评,因为对政府提出具建设性的批评是好事,让政府可以以此前进和发展。 刘伟强随后表示,政府也正在探讨推出反缠扰的相关法律,因为他们发现类似行为已经逐渐形成一种趋势。 他还补充道,政府已经成立检讨1963年马来西亚协议的特别内各委员会,并将于下个月和7月提出完整报告。

人力部冀服务业减少依赖客工,惟网民质问如何处理外籍PMET专才

“有一天我们会看到新加坡服务业的外籍客工人数减少。” 人力部长杨莉明透露,这是新加坡要减少对该领域过度依赖客工的主要原因。 她在参与2019年预算案辩论,针对削减服务业客工配额时说到,“这不是一个轻易做出的决定。我们不得不多次考虑这个决定”。 客工比率顶限(Dependency Ratio Ceiling,简称DRC),指的是公司员工总数和可聘请客工人数限额,之间的比例。服务业客工比率顶限将会分两个阶段进行削减,即目前减至40巴仙到2021年的35巴仙。 她补充说,S准证的客工比率顶限也将从现在的15巴仙减至2021年的10巴仙。 不能确保客工来源不断 有鉴于其他东南亚国家中产阶级也在不断增长,如果客工在其他国家也能领到相近的薪资,他们可能会不愿到我国的服务业打工。 杨莉明指出,“我们必须问自己这个问题:‘我们是否可以无限期地获得外国员工?’而这个答案如果是‘不’,那么我们最好三思,然后调整我们的政策。” 最重要的是,降低客工比率顶限的正面影响,将逐步引领可持续性的经商模式、和重新培养本地人,以适应日益数字化的未来挑战。 政府也将通过扩大配套范围和新措施,以协助相关企业达到这个目标等,而财政部长宣布总值10亿新元的一系列措施,以协助当地公司转型。…

We cannot remain silent.

by Constance Singam “If credibility, trust, and character become critical issues in…