On 28 March 2011, the People’s Action Party (PAP) introduced one of its new candidates, Ms Tin Pei Ling, which it intends to field in the upcoming General Election.

Shortly after the formal introduction of Ms Tin at a press conference, a video of Ms Tin was made available online, on Youtube and on the PAP website.

In the video, titled “Tin Pei Ling introduction video”, Ms Tin wore a white jacket with a PAP badge on the collar.

At the end of the video, she appealed to viewers:

“My name is Tin Pei Ling and I am from the People’s Action Party.

Please vote for me.”

According to Section 83 (2) of the Parliamentary Elections Act, ( statutes.agc.gov.sg.) it is stated that:

“No person shall conduct any election activity unless he is in possession of a written authority signed by a candidate or his election agent in Form 22 or Form 23, as the case may be, in the First Schedule; and such authority shall be issued only on or after the day of nomination.”

According to the Act:

… ‘election activity’ includes any activity which is done for the purpose of promoting or procuring the election of a candidate at any election other than clerical work wholly performed within enclosed premises.”

In other words, anyone who conducts “election activity” before nomination day would by definition not have a “written authority” and hence would be in breach of 83(2).

The Act also states:

“Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of this section shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both.”

Does Ms Tin’s appeal to viewers to “please vote for me” constitute an infringement of the Act?

————

Note:

Form 22 is a written authorisation from a candidate addressed to the Returning Officer, Elections Dept, to authorise a named person to conduct “election activity” on the candidate’s behalf.

Form 23 is a written authorisation from a candidate’s election agent addressed to the Returning Officer, Elections Dept, to authorise a named person to conduct “election activity” on the candidate’s behalf.

A “candidate” is defined in the PEA as “a person who is nominated as a candidate for election to any seat in Parliament”. If the writ of election has not been issued, then there can be no “candidate” as defined, in which case there cannot be Form 22 or Form 23 and so there can be no person authorised to conduct “election activity”.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

How life plays tricks on PAP and its words

In its traditional spirit of one-upmanship, the People’s Action Parry (PAP) has,…

自6月18日起 所有入境旅客需须自费检测费用

我国自6月2日阻断措施结束后,迎来第一阶段的解封,而近日我国即将进入第二阶段的解封,边境限制也逐渐放缓。尽管已逐步放缓,但我国仍持续对入境和出境的旅客实施监测,但自本月18日起,所有入境新加坡的旅客需自付酒店隔离和检测费用。 据卫生部文告指出,政府迄今为止已承担大部分的检测费用,但随着重新开放边界,让更多人能够入境新加坡,其检测费用将需要自行承担。自本月17日23时59分开始,所有入境和出境新加坡的旅客将需支付冠病检测费用。 与此同时,若非新加坡公民或永久居民将需自行承担居家通告(SHN)费用。 其检测一次的费用约为200,如果在指定酒店完成14天隔离,也须自己承担费用,14天的住宿费约2000元。 昨日,政府跨部门工作小组称,过去14天,曾到过亚太十个地区逗留的旅客,本月17日午夜起,入境我国后将无需再到指定隔离设施履行居家通知令。 这些地区包括:香港、日本、越南、澳门、中国、新西兰、韩国、台湾、澳洲和文莱。

LTA overlooks Nuovo residents’ concerns on NSE

by Deborah Choo/ The Land Transport Authorities (LTA)’s decision to build the…

Hotel Equatorial Penang to close down by 31 March due to COVID-19 impact

Malaysia, Penang — Hotel Equatorial Penang will cease operations effective 31 March…