On 28 March 2011, the People’s Action Party (PAP) introduced one of its new candidates, Ms Tin Pei Ling, which it intends to field in the upcoming General Election.

Shortly after the formal introduction of Ms Tin at a press conference, a video of Ms Tin was made available online, on Youtube and on the PAP website.

In the video, titled “Tin Pei Ling introduction video”, Ms Tin wore a white jacket with a PAP badge on the collar.

At the end of the video, she appealed to viewers:

“My name is Tin Pei Ling and I am from the People’s Action Party.

Please vote for me.”

According to Section 83 (2) of the Parliamentary Elections Act, ( statutes.agc.gov.sg.) it is stated that:

“No person shall conduct any election activity unless he is in possession of a written authority signed by a candidate or his election agent in Form 22 or Form 23, as the case may be, in the First Schedule; and such authority shall be issued only on or after the day of nomination.”

According to the Act:

… ‘election activity’ includes any activity which is done for the purpose of promoting or procuring the election of a candidate at any election other than clerical work wholly performed within enclosed premises.”

In other words, anyone who conducts “election activity” before nomination day would by definition not have a “written authority” and hence would be in breach of 83(2).

The Act also states:

“Any person who contravenes any of the provisions of this section shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $2,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to both.”

Does Ms Tin’s appeal to viewers to “please vote for me” constitute an infringement of the Act?

————

Note:

Form 22 is a written authorisation from a candidate addressed to the Returning Officer, Elections Dept, to authorise a named person to conduct “election activity” on the candidate’s behalf.

Form 23 is a written authorisation from a candidate’s election agent addressed to the Returning Officer, Elections Dept, to authorise a named person to conduct “election activity” on the candidate’s behalf.

A “candidate” is defined in the PEA as “a person who is nominated as a candidate for election to any seat in Parliament”. If the writ of election has not been issued, then there can be no “candidate” as defined, in which case there cannot be Form 22 or Form 23 and so there can be no person authorised to conduct “election activity”.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【冠状病毒19】8月8日新增132例确诊 六入境病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月8日中午12时,本地新增132例冠病19确诊,有一例是社区病例,入境病例六例。 本地累计确诊已增至5万4929例。 新增病例大多为客工,住在作为隔离设施的独栋宿舍。社区病例是本地公民。 至于入境病例在抵境后已遵循居家通知。

NUS Assoc Prof Kenneth Paul Tan: PAP govt has become ‘decadent’ as it reached the pinnacle of their accomplishment

The ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) has become “decadent” in a way…

Four Bangladeshi workers convicted and sentenced for financing terrorism

Four Bangladeshi workers were convicted and sentenced by a Singapore court yesterday…

Fish farmers still expected to meet quota to retain fish farm license despite massive losses

Despite the massive losses incurred by fish farmers, they will still be expected to fulfill the quota of 17 tonnes fish product imposed upon by the AVA as a requirement to retain their license for fish farms.