The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has issued a challenge to the Minister for Community, Youth and Sports, and Member of Parliament for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan.

The SDP calls on Dr Balakrishnan to engage the party in a “public debate before voters of the Holland-Bukit Timah GRC as well as Bukit Panjang SMC.” The SDP has declared its intentions to contest the two constituencies in the upcoming General Election and has been working the ground there.

Specifically, the SDP wants Dr Balakrishnan to explain to residents three issues: his ministry’s over-spending on the Youth Olympic Games; the “$8 million of the residents’ sinking funds your Town Council lost in toxic investments in 2008”; and why Dr Teo Ho Pin, the MP for Bukit Panjang SMC “failed to speak up on the buy-over of the Fajar wet market in Bukit Panjang by Sheng Siong which caused rentals and prices to increase.”

The SDP’s challenge is issued after Dr Balakrishnan told Channel NewsAsia that he was “looking forward to a contest from the opposition parties.”

“Our residents know us,” Dr Balakrishnan said. “They know the track record. We deliver. And also, we do not believe in making empty promises or big promises.” His remarks were taken by the SDP as an “obvious referral to The SDP Promise” who the party launched over the weekend.

In his letter to Dr Balakrishnan, SDP secretary-general Dr Chee Soon Juan, said his party “would be happy to answer questions” which Dr Balakrishnan might want to pose to them about The Promise.

“On the question on ‘who can deliver and who can [the residents] trust’, we are happy to have that conversation with your team,” Dr Chee said.

——————

Here is the SDP letter to Dr Balakrishnan:

Dr Vivian Balakrishnan
Minister
Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports

Dear Sir,

According to a report by the Channel NewsAsia, you said that your team at Holland-Bukit Timah GRC have delivered and that the residents there “know your track record”. You add that you are “happy to let the residents be the judge”.

You also said that you do not “believe in making empty promises or big promises” – an obvious referral to The SDP Promise that we launched over the weekend.

If that is the case then you would have no hesitation in accepting the SDP’s invitation for a public debate before voters of the Holland-Bukit Timah GRC as well as Bukit Panjang SMC.

The people can only be the judge if they hear both sides of the story. At the moment they are only hearing yours.

What we would like the residents to hear is the complete version of your track record which we want to ask you and your teammates in the debate.

Specifically we want to ask you, as MCYS Minister, to tell the residents how much and on what items was spent for the Youth Olympic Games (YOG). We would like to invite you to show the country the full accounts of the YOG and to answer questions on how your Ministry came to over-spend the budget by three times.

We also want to ask you and your team-mates about the $8 million of the residents’ sinking funds your Town Council lost in toxic investments in 2008.

Thirdly, we would like to debate your fellow MP Dr Teo Ho Pin on why he failed to speak up on the buy-over of the Fajar wet market in Bukit Panjang by Sheng Siong which caused rentals and prices to increase.

In return, we would be happy to answer questions that you might want to pose to us about our Promise. On the question on “who can deliver and who can [the residents] trust”, we are happy to have that conversation with your team.

So rather than talk at residents through the state media, why don’t you meet us in a debate and let the residents watch and hear for themselves firsthand both the PAP’s and the SDP’s arguments? The residents can then go to the polls and make an informed decision on who they really want as their MPs.

Right now, all they are hearing is your voice through the television and the newspapers.

We hope that you will accept this invitation on behalf of your team-mates at the Holland-Bukit Timah GRC and Bukit Panjang SMC.

Sincerely,

Chee Soon Juan
Secretary-General
Singapore Democratic Party

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

分析师预测 淡马锡上财年可能出现负回报率

根据《联合早报》报导,淡马锡控股和政府投资公司(GIC)将公布最新财年财报。不过分析师预估,基于过去一财年充满挑战,两家机构可能取得负回报率(negative returns)。 分析师预计淡马锡资产总值在去年创下新高(突破3000亿元)后,今年可能小幅下滑,跌至2.5至5巴仙之间。 而打压市场表现的两大因素:中美贸易纠纷和全球经济减速,预计冲击淡马锡和GIC上财年表现。 市场人士预测,GIC截至今年3月底的20年平均实际回报率预计,会比去年的3.4巴仙低。 不过事实上,影响淡马锡和GIC表现的恐怕不仅仅是上述两大宏观经济因素。 举例来说,淡马锡在去年4月襄助德国制药集团拜耳(Bayer),收购农业科技公司孟山都(monsanto)。出售3.6巴仙、价值30亿欧元(约48亿新元)的股权给淡马锡,以筹措收购孟山都的资金。 然而,孟山都官司缠身,例如孟山都被一名加州男子提控,指该公司生产的除草剂导致他罹患癌症。在今年三月,美国旧金山法院陪审团得出一致结论,认为除草剂是导致男子患癌的主要因素。 这项半决对其他1万多起诉讼起到示范效应。去年,旧金山一家法院判孟山都需对一名癌患者赔偿。 这些诉讼无疑对拜尔造成冲击,其股价自去年8月首宗诉讼后就下跌。从96.77欧元,跌至上周五60.94欧元,淡马锡买了该公司30亿欧元股权,意味着可能蒙受至少40巴仙的损失。 根据GIC官网,GIC和金管局管理由政府发行的特别新加坡政府证券(SSGS)。至于公积金局,也把国人的公积金钱投资其中。官网解释,虽然公积金前没有直接被GIC转移以管理该证券,不过GIC管理政府资产的其中一个资金来源是SSGS证券的收益。

Media regulations a liability for the government

By Howard Lee The Singapore’s government continued intent to regulate and censor…

Former NUSSU student rep defends actions taken by NUS in sexual assault case

Chiming in on the recent discourse on how NUS decided to handle…

The Minister is right – let’s look at outcomes to see if there is inequality and rich-poor disparity

Look at the outcomes Singapore has achieved, Social and Family Development Minister…