by Deborah Choo/

The Land Transport Authorities (LTA)’s decision to build the North South Expressway (NSE) along Ang Mo Kio Avenue 6 has deeply upset the residents at Nuovo Executive Condominium.

 

Nuovo Executive Condominium

In January this year when LTA first announced its decision to build the NSE, Nuovo, along with nearby Castle Green and Bullion Park Condominium, had part of their land compulsorily acquired by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) for the construction of expressway. However, Nuovo is the most badly affected of the three as it has a higher percentage of residents’ apartments slated to face the semi-tunnel and is situated only barely 15 metres away from the projected NSE. On the other hand, Castle Green is 30 metres away and Bullion Park is situated 50 metres away.

Mr Chua, 40, an engineer, bought his apartment less than a year ago. He is particularly worried of the NSE’s impact on his baby’s health. “As it is now, the road and MRT noise is already border-line unbearable so I cannot imagine it getting worse. Having lack of sleep from traffic noise that increases early in the morning (rush hour traffic) and breathing in pollutants are what me and my family (baby included) will have to contend with if LTA do not heed our plea and build fully underground tunnel as what they did for KPE.”

Some 95 percent of Nuovo’s residents have signed an appeal requesting asking the LTA to reconsider its decision. The appeal cited several main concerns:

(1) Health issue brought on by prolonged exposure to pollutants,
(2) Noise pollution and the impact on their daily activities,
(3) The distance of the boundary wall from the condo to the NSE tunnel (which is supposed to be two to three meters away from Nuovo’s swimming pool and basement carpark but according to residents’ measurements only stretch up to a maximum of one metre), and
(4) Property valuation.

 

Nuovo's current boundary line (see picture) will be pushed back by at least four metres due to SLA's compulsory land acquisition.

The appeal letter also proposed an alternative to LTA: To consider extending the full underground tunnel from Anderson Junior College to the intersection of Yio Chu Kang road which is situated away from residential areas.

LTA’s Chief Executive Officer Mr Chew Hock Yong replied on 22 February. He rejected the suggestion, stating that the proposed stretch of road would require the building of an additional ventilation building. However, “due to competing land uses, no suitable site is available.”

When it came to addressing the residents’ concerns on health impacts, the letter stated that LTA will “fully comply with NEA’s standards”. It also said that noise reflectors will be used for the semi tunnels. Regarding concerns over the boundary wall, Mr Chew assured residents that “a safe distance will be maintained.” As for property valuation, LTA stated that URA would honor the last approved GFA upon redevelopment.

“LTA’s response was disappointing.  It does not address most of the valid concerns which we have brought up in our appeal letter, for example, air pollution and noise,” a Nuovo resident told TOC.  “Nuovo residents feel that the government is not concerned about protecting the health of existing residents’ and our young children.”

On 15 March, a discussion between residents, LTA and SLA ended with promises of a meeting with MINDEF, National Environment Agency (NEA) and Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA). However, residents say they were informed via email shortly after, to organize their own meetings with the other parties.

Meanwhile, some like Darren Lim, have put their property up for sale. An accountant who moved into Nuovo only about 15 months ago. Mr Lim is an asthmatic. His wife is currently pregnant and he has two young children.

“I am utterly disappointed that cost has come into the picture when people’s health and the environment in which our children grow up are in that same equation.” Mr Lim said. “I wonder how such costs have been calculated or taken into account in arriving at their decisions to build a half tunnel of an expressway a metre or two next to a residential compound?”

LTA was unreachable for comment.

“Our government has always been trumpeting about how open and fair they are in their policies and plans.” Mr Chua added, “in this case, they have shown lack of openness and lack of fairness.”

The Online Citizen understands that resident at Castle Green condominium are also intending to appeal the LTA’s decision and petitions are being collected at the moment.

Construction of the NSE is scheduled to start in 2 years. The targeted date for completion is 2020.

UPDATE:

LTA replied to TOC’s query at 5.33 PM today with this: “The answers to the questions you raised has been covered before by Minister Raymond Lim in Parliament in February 2011.”

LTA also assured that it will continue to work with the Advisor, the Working Committee and the MCST to “engage and update the residents of the project progress and address their concerns.” 

Read also: Saving the line.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Studies on mutation and aggressiveness of new Covid-19 virus is still at early stage

On Thursday (12 March), a South China Morning Post (SCMP) story revealed…

梁实轩反诉总理滥用程序遭高庭驳回 上诉聆讯明日进行

今年三月,时评人梁实轩申请反告总理李显龙滥用司法程序,被高庭法官驳回。不过其代表律师林鼎仍对此进行上诉。 今日林鼎在脸书更新上诉近况,指出有关上诉将在明日下午2时30分,在上诉庭进行聆讯。 届时,将由大法官梅达顺、上诉法官潘文龙(Andrew Phang)与朱迪柏拉卡斯(Judith Prakash),聆听林鼎代表梁实轩作出上诉陈情。 不过他提醒明日的上诉聆讯,仍不是总理提告梁实轩诽谤的聆讯,而主要是审视,梁实轩是否应获准反告总理滥用司法程序。 分享贴文,去年11月遭总理提告 只因分享一则脸书贴文,梁实轩于去年11月遭总理提告诽谤,指出梁分享的贴文内容毫无根据,诋毁总理人格和声誉。 有关文章指《砂拉越报告》主编克莱尔,在接受访谈时指出在一马公司弊案中,新加坡和瑞士及美国,成了调查对象。但较后《砂》已澄清有关文章内容不实,要求STR纠正。 然而,梁实轩当时纯粹分享贴文,也未留下任何个人评述和留言。他已遵循资媒局指示撤下了贴文,但还是被总理以法律诉讼对付。 对于总理的提告,梁实轩也由代表律师林鼎,在去年12月底反诉总理滥用法庭程序,并向总理索讨“名誉损害”的赔偿。 不过,高庭法官Aedit…

柔佛州务大臣奥斯曼已呈辞

据了解,马来西亚柔佛州务大臣奥斯曼沙比安已经辞职。 马国首相马哈迪在今日,于马国国会向媒体证实,奥斯曼已在周一(4月8日)向他呈辞,辞职立刻生效。 他也表示,奥斯曼也将辞职信交给柔佛苏丹依布拉欣陛下。 不过,马哈迪表示目前还未决定由谁出任新大臣,将选出代州务大臣,或进行正式委任。 目前有三至四位人选。根据希盟协议,柔州大臣一职將由来自土著团结党的成员出任。 不过,马哈迪未透露奥斯曼辞职的原因,仅表示未来再透露详情。 早前,奥斯曼将被撤职的谣言满天飞,而他昨日前往布城会见首相也成为焦点。加上他缺席週二在布城举行的第九届马新领导人非正式会议,更加深了外界对他辞职的揣测。 柔王储:王室早有换大臣之意 柔佛王储东姑依斯迈甚至在推特发文,指柔佛王室早有撤换大臣之意,苏丹依布拉欣陛下早在一个月前就有此打算。 他说,苏丹希望新的大臣不再是布城的应声虫,必须以柔佛的繁荣和人民福祉为优先。 Saya harap…

五年前掉入下水道受伤 女子向公用事业局索偿500万元!

2015年12月1日,一名任职会计师的女子在经过西门路(Simon Road)时,在实龙岗上段的交界处不慎掉进一个无孔盖的下水道。 这一摔导致,导致她擦伤、脚踝骨折,一度住院五天,甚至于脊椎椎间盘突出,她无法跑步、腰部会出现间接性疼痛。若坐下超过1小时都会感到颈部疼痛。右手活动也因神经损伤受限制。 五年后,这名47岁女子陈慧萍(Chan Hui Peng译音),决定起诉公用事业局(PUB),索偿高达500万元!在庭上,她的代表律师指责该局需负起至少七成的责任,要求针对她所承受的痛苦、未来的医药费、失去生育能力、失去工作能力等等索偿。 女子也声称自己患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD),有出现头痛、焦虑和恐慌的症状,还有重度抑郁症和精神分裂症。甚至于,对洞穴都感到恐惧而做噩梦。 公用事业局的辩护律师指出,当时现场有三名工作人员在检查下水道,女子接近洞口时却没有绕道而行;但女子也驳斥,自己并没有使用手机,却非常注意前方,也指下水道被树叶遮住,她只看到“一大片阴影”。 至于三名工作人员,女子称他们都穿便装,现场也没有树立告示牌。 辩护律师则指女子的陈述“不诚实”,也表示辩方心理专家会鉴定陈女士是否真的患有创伤后障碍。