This is a review from a statistical perspective, wherever possible, of the book “Reflections on housing a nation”, launched on 22 March. (You can read it here for free and save yourself ten dollars. – Editor)


Leong Sze Hian

In Part Eight (“Seeking truth from facts in the housing debate”), the Minister for National Development wrote:

“Dr Goh Keng Swee used to quote the Chinese saying, “Seek truth from facts (实事求是)”. Let us heed these words of wisdom as we address the people’s concerns”.

Lower-income can afford HDB flats? Truth or fact?

The truth of the matter in the context of public housing, is that for many Singaporeans, particularly the lower-income, their real income has hardly gone up, over the last five, 10 years.

Moreover, the cost of living continues to accelerate. For example, the average surgery bill in the Class C wards of six of the seven public hospitals increased by at least 50 per cent to as much as double over the last four years, electricity tariffs keep going up, increase in public transport fares, child-care fees, university fees, etc.

In such an environment, how many lower-income Singaporeans cannot afford to buy a HDB flat ?

The uncertain future

When your flat comes in about five years’ time, wouldn’t you be afraid that your circumstances may change such that you may not be able to afford the flat, not to mention the risks and uncertainties of job losses, pay-cuts, illness, etc, over a 30-year mortgage loan?

HDB creates new problem – getting a loan?

The other truth and fact is the issue of the new rule on a second HDB concessionary loan.

How many people can cough up 50 per cent of the cash profits from their last HDB flat sold, regardless of how long ago, and also have their entire CPF utilized plus accrued interest from the previous flat to pay for the new flat?

Nobody wants two-room flats because they can afford bigger ones?

The $2,000 household income ceiling eligibility for two-room flats has not changed for many years, whilst the two-room price has escalated to the typical selling price of $105,000 now.

After the HDB announced on 3 March 2006, after it had stopped building two-room flats in the early 1980s, that it would resume the building of the flats from June 2006, the average price of a two-room flat in November 2007 in Compassvale Beacon (Sengkang), was only $78,000 for example.

I estimate that the prices of two-room BTO flats may have increased by about over 30 per cent over the last four years or so. Since two-room flats are the cheapest option for lower-income Singaporeans, why have their prices been allowed to increase by so much?

If your household income is below $2,000, you may be finding it hard to make ends meet in the first place.

So, with the lower income group’s arguably greater incidence and fear of job security, declining wages (over the last decade, it is estimated that 30 per cent of workers have had negative real wage growth), rising cost of living, etc, the truth and fact is that many cannot afford to buy a flat purchase.

Is it really affordable?

According to the HDB’s web site, “Affordability of a Typical Flat”, Applicants’ Median Household Income for two-room is $1,400.

If half of the two-room applicants’ household income was less than $1,400, how on earth can they afford to buy anything, including a flat?

Using $260 as the typical monthly installment for a 30-year loan, after the first-timers’ $40,000 eligible additional CPF housing grant (which is the highest possible grant for those with income of not more than $1,500; applicants must also have been in continuous employment over the last 24 months at the date of the flat application), at 19 per cent installment to income ratio which then seems to suggest that flats are affordable, how can a family struggling with $1,400 a month  afford to squeeze $260 out from their already miserably low income to buy a flat?

Let us not forget, that there are hundreds of thousands of Singaporeans who are self-employed, and thus do not have any CPF contributions to help pay for a HDB flat. So, if you are a lower-income self-employed, the truth of the matter is that you may not be able to afford a HDB flat at today’s sky-rocketing prices.

If you are a lower-income worker, you have CPF contributions to help you pay for a HDB flat – but, your CPF Ordinary Account contribution rate declines as you get older, and what if you lose your job, get a pay-cut, etc, in the next 30 years?

Also, not everyone lower-income family who buys a smaller HDB flat, meets the eligibility criteria for CPF Housing Grants.

How many of those who buy HDB flats do not qualify for grants? Without these statistics,  how can the HDB keep saying that flats are affordable by giving examples of affordability assuming Housing Grants?

Down-payment problems

Finally, many lower-income households may not even be able to come up with the initial 10 per cent down-payment for the flat.

Also, if you are not eligible for a HDB concessionary loan, your down-payment will be increased to 20 per cent from 20 February 2010 for HDB bank loans

End of Part 8

Also read Part 7 here

Mr Leong has beaten Mr Mah by publishing a book in 2008. It has no pictures but at 186 pages (with Chinese translation), is more value for money. You can buy it here!

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Pulling Singapore out of the slums ?!?

By Narayana Narayana – The September 23 2012 (pg 46) Sunday Times…

仅与印度商谈恢复商业航班 民航局澄清未计划开启“航空泡泡”

民航局澄清,我国与印度正协商恢复两国之间的商业航班,但并未有开启航空泡泡(Air Travel Bubble)的打算。 日前,印度驻我国最高专员古玛兰(Periasamy Kumaran)在接受美国CNBC访问时指新印两国正在商讨落实航空泡泡计划。 据他所述,目前有一份恢复两国之间航空连接性的提案,但没有提供任何细节,而两国对此也“颇感兴趣”。 由于我国的入境确诊病例有不少是印度抵境者,不少国人因此质疑这项安排。 对此,民航局则澄清表示,各国对于航空泡泡都有不同的定义,而如今此事也“并非像新加坡人所了解一样”。 针对两国之间的边境开放,民航局则证实两国确实正在商讨恢复两国间的商业航班,但旅客仍受到边境措施的限制,需履行一切防疫措施,如居家隔离等。 当局强调,新加坡并未与印度探讨落实航空泡泡。我国目前只同香港就开启航空泡泡达成协议。 如今唯一经官方证实的航空泡泡为与香港签订的航空泡泡,原定去年11月启动,惟香港疫情出现反弹,大量本土病例激增,被迫搁置航空泡泡计划。

【选举】毕丹星:确保选民票有所值 投选可靠替代政党至关重要

工人党秘书长毕丹星,在今日(27日)的记者会上称,在来届选举,投选有建设性、可靠(credible)的替代政党至关重要,把可靠在野党送入国会,确保选民的选票“票有所值”。 执政党人民行动党将在所有93席竞选,而迄今工人党只会竞选21席,但毕丹星认为,行动党无论如何都会得到他们要的“强力委托”。 但他提醒,更重要的是,需要确保把“可靠的在野党送入国会”,才能保障人民的选票票有所值。 不过,除了已知阿裕尼集选区和后港单选区的留守人选外,迄今毕丹星仍未揭露其他选区由谁上阵。他仅表示在并非所有条件对该党有利、且作为政治舞台较小角色,他认为应谨慎把最后底牌在提名日才亮出来。 对于行动党候选人引起反弹出现争议,毕丹星则解释该党选择候选人的方式。在加入工人党成为党员前,这些候选人通常都是从志工开始,且他们当中许多都积极参与基层工作。 资深党员会观察并根据既有的资讯,作出评断选择,也会花时间和他们详谈了解他们。 对于李显扬儿子李绳武捐款给工人党和前进党,毕丹星卫对此未多加置评,仅表示该党对于政治献金来源都保持开放态度,且也认为人们透过这种方式积极参与政治,协助符合理念的政党成长。 工人党将在明日(28日)公布竞选政纲。