This is a review from a statistical perspective, wherever possible, of the book “Reflections on housing a nation”, launched on 22 March. (You can read it here for free and save yourself ten dollars. – Editor)


Leong Sze Hian

In Part Eight (“Seeking truth from facts in the housing debate”), the Minister for National Development wrote:

“Dr Goh Keng Swee used to quote the Chinese saying, “Seek truth from facts (实事求是)”. Let us heed these words of wisdom as we address the people’s concerns”.

Lower-income can afford HDB flats? Truth or fact?

The truth of the matter in the context of public housing, is that for many Singaporeans, particularly the lower-income, their real income has hardly gone up, over the last five, 10 years.

Moreover, the cost of living continues to accelerate. For example, the average surgery bill in the Class C wards of six of the seven public hospitals increased by at least 50 per cent to as much as double over the last four years, electricity tariffs keep going up, increase in public transport fares, child-care fees, university fees, etc.

In such an environment, how many lower-income Singaporeans cannot afford to buy a HDB flat ?

The uncertain future

When your flat comes in about five years’ time, wouldn’t you be afraid that your circumstances may change such that you may not be able to afford the flat, not to mention the risks and uncertainties of job losses, pay-cuts, illness, etc, over a 30-year mortgage loan?

HDB creates new problem – getting a loan?

The other truth and fact is the issue of the new rule on a second HDB concessionary loan.

How many people can cough up 50 per cent of the cash profits from their last HDB flat sold, regardless of how long ago, and also have their entire CPF utilized plus accrued interest from the previous flat to pay for the new flat?

Nobody wants two-room flats because they can afford bigger ones?

The $2,000 household income ceiling eligibility for two-room flats has not changed for many years, whilst the two-room price has escalated to the typical selling price of $105,000 now.

After the HDB announced on 3 March 2006, after it had stopped building two-room flats in the early 1980s, that it would resume the building of the flats from June 2006, the average price of a two-room flat in November 2007 in Compassvale Beacon (Sengkang), was only $78,000 for example.

I estimate that the prices of two-room BTO flats may have increased by about over 30 per cent over the last four years or so. Since two-room flats are the cheapest option for lower-income Singaporeans, why have their prices been allowed to increase by so much?

If your household income is below $2,000, you may be finding it hard to make ends meet in the first place.

So, with the lower income group’s arguably greater incidence and fear of job security, declining wages (over the last decade, it is estimated that 30 per cent of workers have had negative real wage growth), rising cost of living, etc, the truth and fact is that many cannot afford to buy a flat purchase.

Is it really affordable?

According to the HDB’s web site, “Affordability of a Typical Flat”, Applicants’ Median Household Income for two-room is $1,400.

If half of the two-room applicants’ household income was less than $1,400, how on earth can they afford to buy anything, including a flat?

Using $260 as the typical monthly installment for a 30-year loan, after the first-timers’ $40,000 eligible additional CPF housing grant (which is the highest possible grant for those with income of not more than $1,500; applicants must also have been in continuous employment over the last 24 months at the date of the flat application), at 19 per cent installment to income ratio which then seems to suggest that flats are affordable, how can a family struggling with $1,400 a month  afford to squeeze $260 out from their already miserably low income to buy a flat?

Let us not forget, that there are hundreds of thousands of Singaporeans who are self-employed, and thus do not have any CPF contributions to help pay for a HDB flat. So, if you are a lower-income self-employed, the truth of the matter is that you may not be able to afford a HDB flat at today’s sky-rocketing prices.

If you are a lower-income worker, you have CPF contributions to help you pay for a HDB flat – but, your CPF Ordinary Account contribution rate declines as you get older, and what if you lose your job, get a pay-cut, etc, in the next 30 years?

Also, not everyone lower-income family who buys a smaller HDB flat, meets the eligibility criteria for CPF Housing Grants.

How many of those who buy HDB flats do not qualify for grants? Without these statistics,  how can the HDB keep saying that flats are affordable by giving examples of affordability assuming Housing Grants?

Down-payment problems

Finally, many lower-income households may not even be able to come up with the initial 10 per cent down-payment for the flat.

Also, if you are not eligible for a HDB concessionary loan, your down-payment will be increased to 20 per cent from 20 February 2010 for HDB bank loans

End of Part 8

Also read Part 7 here

Mr Leong has beaten Mr Mah by publishing a book in 2008. It has no pictures but at 186 pages (with Chinese translation), is more value for money. You can buy it here!

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

冯伟衷大哥发文原谅记者洪铭铧

已逝艺人冯伟衷的大哥冯伟健(Jefferson Pang),今天上午透过弟弟经纪公司午言媒体脸书专页发文,表示宽容早前试图追访弟弟女友胡佳琪,采访手法引起争议的《联合早报》记者。 在贴文中,冯伟健指出,听到大家就记者记者洪铭铧的事件争论不休,心情沉重,但是在新西兰要处理的事很多,疲惫不堪,所以选择暂时不理会此事,而是把精神全都集中在照顾父母。 他指出,父母从小灌输许多价值观给他和冯伟衷,包括“要体谅他人,设身处地的为他人着想,注意自己的言行举止,不要做过多地评论 (很多时候保持沉默是最明智的做法)。” “作为兄长,我们希望每个人都知道我们最小的弟弟在爸妈的教导下,每天都朝着充满智慧的方向成长。 即使现在伟衷离开了,我们做任何事还是以他为优先考量。” 他相信,即使在黑暗时期,也要坚守人与人之间最基本的礼貌和对待,他对洪铭铧表示,未第一时间处理感到抱歉,并指出“伟衷不会要让你面对这样的一个局面,不会想让这样的事情发生在你身上。” “尽管你处理这篇报道的方式不太妥当,言词偏激了点,但我还是选择相信这只是你在那时候一时冲动而犯下的错误。对于我没有在第一时间处理这件事,我感到很抱歉。” 他希望此时发文仍为时不晚,也勉励洪铭铧继续坚守岗位,继续撰写和分享有关冯伟衷的文章。 早前,艺人胡佳琪双胞胎姐姐胡佳嬑,揭发有记者疑为争取独家,言词严厉要求胡佳琪开口接受采访。对此记者洪铭铧于本月25日在Instagram账号向胡佳琪道歉,并承认他此次采访受访“或许特别拙劣”。  

25 errant motorists booked for smoky vehicle and idling engine offences

25 errant motorists were booked for smoky vehicle and idling engine offences…

预计需2至3周完成检讨巴蒂案 尚穆根下月才发表部长声明

有鉴于警方和总检察署预计需二至三周时间,完成检讨前女佣巴蒂案,内政部长兼律政部长尚穆根也表示,将在11月才在国会针对此事发表部长声明。 尚穆根是在今日(2日)告知媒体,在警方和总检察署完成检讨后,才会在国会对此发表部长声明。他在上月16日表示,多名议员将在国会复会时,针对前女佣案件提问,为此他也准备提供部长声明回应。 有鉴于此,工人党主席、阿裕尼集选区议员林瑞莲,也暂时不会再申请休会动议,将待部长声明和合适的期间参与辩论。 工人党认为,尽管内部检讨仍在进行,对于巴蒂案件反映刑事司法制度更广泛的问题,有必要采取适当的措施去回应相关缺失。 前女佣巴蒂,被前樟宜机场集团主席廖文良一家指控偷窃,幸在本月初获高庭法官翻案,沉冤得雪。巴蒂一案近两周来引起国人议论,并关注女佣在整个审讯中处于弱势的地位。高庭法官陈成安判决中,更形容廖家父子报警可能存在“不当意图”,被告有充分理由投诉人力部,而廖家“先下手为强”将他开除。 高庭法官陈成安,在判决中也点出所谓“赃物”移交警局过程存在疑点。包括廖家声称开箱检查女佣留下的三大箱子,并报警后,警方未立即取走证物。由于高庭法官的判词,也针对警方的调查工作,这也致使警方需出面回应此事,表示将展开调查。 尽管早前巴蒂有意对两名主控官发起纪律研讯,惟在本周二却又提呈撤诉的申请。 巴蒂代表律师阿尼尔(Anil Balchandani),今午(10月1日)在法庭告知大法官梅达顺,过去一个月来发生的事件,令巴蒂负荷不来,再者被官司缠身四年,巴蒂希望能早日返乡,这是巴蒂有意撤诉的原因之一。 不过,巴蒂仍坚信,两名副检察司(Deputy Public Prosecutor),仍需要针对她的指控作出交代。…

Social media and the evolving polity – Goh Chok Tong and John Major

By Howard Lee The presence of social media and the evolving voting…