A small stretch of the disused KTM railway track in the West brings activists and residents together.


Joshua Chiang/

A striped brown bird flutters out from among some tall grass and flies into the distance as we approach. It is a Pintail Snipe, Dr Ho Hua Chew tells us, a bird that likes to frequent marshy places like the one we are trudging through.

We’re at a stretch of greenery between Faber Walk and Faber Terrace, ten minutes into a walk that would take us along what used to be the Jurong Line, part of the disused KTM (Keretapi Tanah Melayu) railway track.  It’s a part of Singapore few have seen – lush and tranquil and surprisingly full of birdlife. What’s even more remarkable – the fact that the land around the entire track covers some 173 hectares. That’s roughly three times the size of the Botanic Gardens.

Dr Ho addressing the group as resident Peter Png watches

But the fate of the railway land hangs in the balance, and the patch of nature we’re visiting today is now under threat. The Land Transport Authority (LTA) plans to build a road that cuts through the greenery to ease traffic congestion along Jalan Lemping, which connects to Commonwealth Avenue West. It’s a decision some are desperately trying to reverse. Dr Ho, an executive member of the Nature Society, is one of several co-authors of a proposal (download the pdf :TheGreenCorridor101103) to preserve former railway land and convert it into what’s being described as a “Green Corridor”.   Residents of Faber Walk and Faber Terrace where the Jurong Line cuts through have also rallied to the cause.

Walks are a way for the Nature Society to draw attention to the rich biodiversity of the area. The message we take away at the end of the morning is clear – destroy this land and much of the wildlife will also suffer.

For Dr Ho though, the stakes are even higher. The proposed road won’t just cut into the Jurong Line. Once built, it will also dash his hopes of preserving the KTM track in its entirety.

“The historical value of the landmark is very important,” he says. “This line has made enormous contribution to our industrial development.”

“We weren’t consulted”

Among residents of Faber Walk, there’s a deep sense of frustration. They say they were neither consulted, nor informed of the plans for the road. Peter Png tells me he only learned about the proposal on the very night of a meeting between the Residents’ Committee and representatives of the LTA, Urban Renewal Authority (URA) and National Parks Board (NParks).  Word spread and according to Png, he and a group of angry residents surprised the LTA by chartering a bus and showing up at the meeting.

Png says they were then told that a survey had been conducted and people affected by the proposed road, consulted.

“We asked them for details of the survey like who they surveyed, the survey questions and the results, but they could not furnish,” Png explains.

The LTA, for its part, maintains that it had met with grassroots leaders, advisers and residents and got positive feedback prior to building the road. (“Faber residents squawk over road plan” ST 2 Mar 2011)

At the end of the exchange, disgruntled residents were given two months to come up with a counter-proposal.

But in a second meeting, this time attended by the Member of Parliament for the constituency Mrs Yu-Foo Yee Shoon, the residents were told that the Government would go ahead with its plans.

“Sometimes the decision has to benefit the majority,” Mrs Yu-Foo told a Straits Times reporter. “In future, the land will be developed and the population will grow a few times so it’s not just to serve present residents, but it will also have to serve future residents.”

It is unclear what land the MP was referring to.  But there are signs it could be the woodlands next to Faber Walk. According to Png, the LTA has hinted that a developer was interested in building a condominium there.

Png, says that based on the size of the plot of land, the new project will at most be a few stories high and will not contribute substantially to a rise in population. He sees the proposed road as an incentive to entice potential developers to build the condo.

As for the argument that something needs to be done to ease congestion, some residents say that traffic along Jalan Lempang is only heavy on weekdays, between 7:05am to 7:25am. That’s when parents drop off their children at the primary school along the road.

It is a hassle some, at least, are willing to endure.

“I’d rather have the inconvenience [of being caught in the jam at Jalan Lempang] so that we can preserve the green,” says Stella Wong, a Faber Walk resident.

And neither will the proposed road solve future problems. In an unpublished letter to the Straits Times, a new Faber Heights resident explains that as the proposed road exit to Commonwealth Avenue West is only fifty meters from Jalan Lemping, it will cause more jam in the already busy road.

Greater Good?

The pond that used to be a resting spot for a variety of birds

A pond sits at a spot where the proposed road will cut through. Until a fence was built behind it recently, the pond served as a resting place for a variety of birds. As many as 30 species of birds were reportedly sighted, including the Yellow Broadbill and the Long-tailed Parakeet, a bird that is endangered around the world, but is thriving in Singapore.

The LTA has said that it plans to work closely with NParks (National Parks) to replace trees affected by the proposed road. But it is almost certain that when constructions starts, the wild birds, which are notoriously sensitive to any man-made disturbances, will never return.

Leaving the disputed area behind, we continue further along the railway line. The landscape gradually changes as we approach the outskirts of Clementi Housing Estate; vegetable patches and fruit farms now take the place of natural vegtation. Dr Ho explains that these crops are cultivated by the residents living in the surrounding block of flats. The authorities tolerate it as long as no permanent fixtures such as wooden fences are built.

Our journey finally ends two hours later at a truss bridge over the Ulu Pandan Canal. I look across the bridge and see a road that leads not into the future, but into the past, a past that the government is eager to jettison for economic growth. But a nation that doesn’t remember its past is a nation without a soul.

For now, Dr Ho, the Nature Society and Faber Walk residents are pressing on – writing letters, conducting walks doing what they can in the fervent hope that the government overturns its decision.

Find out more about the Green Corridor group here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

总理起诉本社总编许渊臣

李显龙总理 起诉本社总编许渊臣。 本社总编许渊臣,在今午3时51分,收到代表总理李显龙的达文星律师楼( Davinder Singh Chambers LLC)寄来的原告诉状和法庭传票。 法庭传票,请许渊臣在下月15日,出席原告和被告双方的审前会议。 诉状中对本社英语站发表的有关文章提出异议,指该文章作出不实和无根据,并且贬低和诋毁总理。 本周日,李总理新闻秘书张俪霖,代表总理向本社总编许渊臣发函,指本社英语站在8月15日刊登的一篇评论,复述针对总理的不实指控,要求本社撤下并在三日内道歉。 对此,许渊臣在昨日致函总理答复。在信中,许渊臣强调,自己始终都是问责、透明和法治的忠实信徒;并认为有关评论文章不含诽谤性,而是根据可能对事件知情的总理家人此前发表的公开声明,也有鉴于涉及公共利益问题,为了能避免造成疑虑,只能重新复述总理弟妹曾说过的话。 对于总理新闻秘书信函第八段提出的要求,即立即移除有关文章,并在本月4日前无条件作出道歉,以及承诺不在《网络公民》刊登类似的指控,许渊臣则婉拒了这些要求。 许渊臣答复总理完整信函

【冠狀病毒19】曾有确诊病患到过豪阁林购物廊

据卫生部文告,曾有确诊病患,在6月3日中午12点至下午1点之间,到过豪阁林购物廊(Hougang Green Shopping Mall)。 卫生部呼吁,若有民众与确诊病患在上述时段出现在该地点,宜人士密切留意自己的健康状况。 与确诊病例有过密切接触者,相信已收到当局的通知。卫生部将每天更新最近14天社区病患曾到访过的地点(若有),让人们提高警惕。 其他近期确诊病患曾到过的地点包括: 5月30日晚上10点30分至11点:Woodlands Mart巨人超市 6月2日下午2点45分至3点25分:淡滨尼广场地下一楼 6月2日傍晚5点至5点30分:金文泰广场(The Clementi…

Grab driver supposedly earned $5,227.82 in a week prior CNY, netizens voice worries over his health

SINGAPORE — An anonymous Grab driver claimed to have made an impressive…

即日起生效 二赌场入场税涨50巴仙

圣淘沙名胜世界和滨海湾金沙赌场入场税即日起调涨50巴仙,即新加坡公民和永久居民的赌场入场税,将从原本的100元调涨至150元,一年的入场税则从2000元调涨至3000元。 内政部指出,有关的调涨于4月4日生效。 当局在检讨入场税时,也考虑了各种因素,包括了嗜赌情况、家庭收入的改变、其他赌场包括赌船和云顶等现有的收费,以及整体的经济情况。 当局在今年8月1日开始,也将收紧预付和启动入场税的措施,限制赌客只能在入场税有效期的最后六小时前,才能预付隔日的入场税。第二次的入场税也会在支付后六小时内,自动启动。 采取数种预防嗜赌措施 两座赌场于2010年先后运作,但是政府采取了数种措施预防嗜赌情况出现,包括设立入场税、入门次数限制、赌场广告和促销限制等。有关的措施成功在10年期间,控制了嗜赌情况,但是政府仍然坚持加强预防。 当局除了调涨入场税,社会与家庭发展部也会和业者密切合作,研究可限制嗜赌行为的科技,例如采用外国赌场设定花费预算的措施。 预防嗜赌理事会发文告指出,当局支持政府提高赌场入场税和采用赌客管理预算的行为,表示有关举措可以提高赌客对自己行为的意识和控制能力。 在赌场禁门法令下,截至去年共有6万7500人被拒于赌场之外。 二集团承诺投资90亿 另一方面,两个赌场的持有集团,云顶新加坡和拉斯维加斯金沙集团为了延长赌牌,向我国政府承诺进行总值90亿新元的非博彩投资。他们的赌牌获准延长至20130年。 政府表示,两座综合度假村扩建计划,预计将为我国制造5000个就业机会。…