This is a review from a statistical perspective, wherever possible, of the book “Reflections on housing a nation”, launched on 22 March. (You can read it here for free and save yourself ten dollars. – Editor)


Leong Sze Hian/

In Part Six (“Housing for the Lower Income”), the Minister for National Development wrote:

“Take the case of Mdm P.  She was only 35 when she divorced her husband and was awarded custody of her two young children. She was not working and had no income. Her future seemed bleak.

After assessing Mdm P’s case, HDB helped her with a subsidised rental flat.  Seven years on, Mdm P has a good steady job and has moved her family to a three-room HDB flat in Sengkang. She pays for her housing loan almost entirely out of her CPF contribution.  Mdm P is hopeful of the future for her and her family”

For every Mdm P who is helped by the HDB, there may be many other divorcees whose lives become shattered by the HDB’s policies on divorcees.

According to the HDB’s web site:

“If there are no children from the marriage, the divorced party (flat owner) may retain the flat under the Single Singapore Citizen (SSC) Scheme, provided:

  • he / she is a Singapore citizen
  • he / she is at least 35 years old

the matrimonial flat must be a resale flat purchased from the open market without the CPF Housing Grant for Family”.

So, the problem is what if you are a permanent resident (PR)? If you are below 35 year old? If you bought a new flat directly from HDB, instead of a resale flat? If you bought a resale flat, but with a CPF Housing Grant for Family?

Moreover, HDB requires you to cancel your existing HDB loan, and take another one. So, what if you do not qualify for a loan, or the loan amount which you need?

Also, the other spouse’s CPF utilised plus accrued interest has to be returned to his or her CPF account. What if you do not have the CPF or cash or loan to do this?

“If the matrimonial flat is bought directly from HDB (including resale flats bought with the CPF Housing Grant for Family), the 5-year minimum occupation period (MOP) must be satisfied before the divorced party is allowed to take over the flat under the SSC Scheme.

If the divorced owners wish to resell their flat in the open market, they must have completed the MOP for the flat, as at the date of divorce completion. If the divorce is within the MOP and none of the owners is eligible to retain the flat, the owners may have to return the flat to HDB, subject to HDB’s approval. The compensation for the return of flat will be determined by HDB”.

What this means is that if you have not completed the MOP, HDB may compulsorily acquire your flat and compensate you with an amount which I understand may be way below the market and Cash-over-valuation (COV) value.

“Under the HDB’s prevailing policy for divorce (not due to non-consummation of marriage or annulment or break-up of Fiancé / Fiancée relationship), a divorced party who has the custody of the child (including care and control) is allowed to retain the flat subject to the eligibility conditions”

What if you do not have custody of the children? If you cannot get a loan to meet all the financial obligations described above?

If you are a divorcee, you may apply to buy an HDB flat or be listed as an occupier after 5 years from the date the divorce is made absolute to the date of application for a new flat if your matrimonial flat was:

“Bought directly from HDB,

A DBSS flat bought under the CPF Housing Grant Scheme, or

A resale flat bought from open market under the CPF Housing Grant Scheme

However, the 5 years period will not apply if:

The matrimonial flat was bought from the open market without any CPF Housing Grant

You are applying for the flat with your parents or new spouse”

What this means is that divorcees are also barred from applying for a new flat for five years, unless you remarry, or apply with your parent(s) who do not own a HDB flat, and can meet all the eligibility rules.

So many “ifs”?

So, with all the above “ifs”, is it any wonder that so many divorcees have housing problems? Sadly, it is often the children, who do not undersatand why they no longer have a home – can you imagine the parent trying to explain the HDB’s policies that may be the cause of their housing woes to their children?

Uniquely Singapore!

Let the numbers do the talking?

In this connection, here are some questions on HDB statistics:-

How many HDB rental flat tenants have been evicted for failing to pay rents?

Would the additional 7,500 rental flats to be built over the next three years be enough, given that the waiting period and the waiting list itself are so long?

Where do the homeless sleep in the meantime?

How many homeless shelters, in terms of the number of units and occupiers, are there in total in Singapore?

How many homeless are on the waiting list for such shelters?

How many homeless are housed under the Interim Housing Scheme?

How many homeless in the Interim Housing Scheme have been evicted for failing to pay rents?

If the 2,200 SERS flats and other non-SERS flats rented to foreigners are rented to Singaporeans instead, does it mean that there will be no homeless, and no waiting list in the queue for HDB rental flats?

How many homeless people have been taken away for staying in public places?

How many homeless people have been fined for illegally staying in public places?

How many HDB flats have been repossessed by the HDB?

How many HDB flat owners have been forced to sell their flats in the open market?

End of Part 7

Also read Part 6 here

Mr Leong has beaten Mr Mah by publishing a book in 2008. It has no pictures but at 186 pages (with Chinese translation), is more value for money. You can buy it here!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

行动党议员也提环境税 林志蔚:疫情下政府亦未撤碳税

盛港集选区议员林志蔚,本周在国会中提问,若新加坡航空落实“空中漫游”(新航已打消念头),政府会否对此征收环境税。不过交通部长王乙康已表明立场,当下对新航征环境税如同“落井下石”。 据林志蔚在7日的脸书贴文,重申他本身的用意,是冀望能群策群力,商讨能在不牺牲环境的前提下扶助新航,他也坚信透过调整成本,征收环境税甚至能让新航员工受惠,保住工作。 不过林志蔚坦言对于一些言论感到有些失望,指他在危难时刻,还有意征收额外税收。 林志蔚重申,“我会在“空中漫游”的课题中提出环境税的讨论是因为,我认为好的政策,必须经过深思熟虑和严正的辩论所得出来的结果。我也一直将其视为我从政的原则。“ 在他今日(9日)发表的脸书贴文,则附上一份国会通告截图。原来那是蔡厝港集选区议员黄文鸿,询问环境和永续部部长,有鉴于瓶子或包包装饮料产品对环境的影响,当局会否征收环境税?有关提问已被撤回。 事实上,林志蔚表示,环境课题影响深远,不应以牺牲工作和利润为代价,同时也不应只是因地制宜。 “因为环境是影响着所有子孙后代的生存问题。我相信拯救工作与拯救地球,是相辅相成的。” 他也相信国会其他议员也对于环境税也会保持一些想法,但每个人都有权利在经过深思熟虑后改变主意。 与此同时,林志蔚也谈及碳税的课题,直指政府选择不撤销碳税,也间接承认环境课题的重要性。 政府亦重视环境权衡 “事实上,政府在疫情期间选择不撤销碳税,间接承认,任何政策商讨中,我们应始终牢记环境因素,与之权衡。” 尽管此次争取失败,但他在文末也表示,将会竭尽所能,坚持提出建设性批评和评论。…

Education system’s lack of mental health care may have “failed” 16-year-old who allegedly murdered fellow student, said RVHS almunus

As the nation, especially school students, grapple with the tragedy of a…

人民行动党议员也恢复会见选民活动

日前,环境局宣布放宽措施,可恢复50人以下的会见人民活动(Meet the People session)。受阻断措施,会见人民活动一度暂停,以降低冠病19传染风险。 随着放宽措施宣布后,朝野政党也开始着手准备会见人民活动。本社早前报导,工人党议员做足防疫措施,恢复与民会面。行动党方面,三巴旺集选区议员、交通部长王乙康于12日在脸书上发文表示,“能够与选民面对面交流真好。” 王乙康也在帖文中强调,仍以居民安全优先,所以会强制实施体温检测和严格的社交距离,确保众人的安全。 同时,王乙康指出,为了能够提供给更多灵活性,线上会见选民活动也会持续进行,因此也呼吁选民持续支持线上会见选民活动,减少人群聚集。 除了王乙康外,另名人民行动党成员维凯,也呼吁选民多多利用线上方式联系,可以通过电邮表达他们的困扰和担忧。 碍于疫情仍未完全褪去,因此要同时处理线上和线下活动,维凯则表示会有点挑战性。 他在文末也向志愿者团队表达感谢,“非常感谢志愿者团队,为了配合不断变化的指导方针,而必须做出许多调整,即使我们身处不同地方,仍然能确保活动顺利进行。 马林百列集选区议员陈诗龙也在12日时恢复会见选民活动,并称已经采取预防措施,确保每个人的安全,也晒出了一张志愿者的照片,让他在衣服上贴了二维码。 “这包括我们的志愿者和选民,均需登记SafeEntry,并测量体温,以及为所需要的人提供足够的消毒和湿巾。”…

被控欺诈罪 卷3300万律师马国落网

律师卷走3300万元托管款项失踪案,有关律师已经被逮捕,并且被带上庭面控。 41岁的律师王赐安(Jeffrey Ong Su Aun)于上周末,正式被控欺诈罪。 被告涉嫌卷走由艾来得科技(Allied Technologies)托付于本地律师事务所JLC Advisors托管的3300万元。 艾来得科技曾指出,自今年3月23日至5月17日,多次向该事务所锁套有关的托管款项,但是事务所管理合伙人,即被告王赐安仅仅表示款项很快会发放,却未提及因为款项不见而无法发放,或是事务所无法遵照托管合约交出款项一事。 随后,艾来得在5月29日接到事务所信函,告知有关的3340万元托管款项已经被提出,并指有理由相信该款项可能由王赐安“未经授权”而提出。有关的款项必须经由艾来得科技执行董事Low Si Ren和独立董事Lim…