The following is an excerpt from The Intepreter

Photo by Flickr user Amizyo.

Dr Michael Barr/

Australians looking at Singapore as a model for pulling the poor up by their bootstraps (such as Noel Pearson in The Australian) will be disappointed. Singapore’s success is not replicable or desirable.

Singapore had its economic take-off by turning itself into a regional manufacturing and exporting base while China and India were sleeping and the US was booming and buying. If China or India had been competitors in the global market during the 1960s, ’70s and ’80s, then Singapore would never have followed the path it did and could not have succeeded as it did. Needless to say, China and India are no longer sleeping, and the US is no longer booming or buying.

Furthermore, the manufacture-for-export pattern of development upon which Singapore relied and continues to rely to this day, is already past its prime. The Singaporean Government recognises this, and is desperately trying to find alternative models. To suggest that Australia revert to a model that worked for Singapore in the 1970s and is being systematically abandoned as we speak would be a foolish move indeed.

Pearson argues that Singapore has developed without the creation of an underclass and that the country has ‘free(d) itself from poverty’. In fact Singapore has two underclasses. The first consists of poor Singaporeans who live in a high-cost city, but who work without significant political or industrial protections: without a minimum wage, without independent unions, without much by way of welfare or health benefits and without much hope of themselves or their children ever climbing out of the poverty trap.

There are many Singaporeans working 10 and 12 hours a day, 7 days a week, for as little as Singapore $3-4 per hour (S$1 is worth about 80c Australian) with few social security benefits. Members of this underclass become very visible late at night in food courts, where aged grandmothers and grandfathers work for a pittance serving food and cleaning tables and toilets.

Click here to read on.

Dr Michael Barr is Senior Lecturer at Flinders University. His most recent book, written with Zlatko Skrbiš, is Constructing Singapore: Elitism, Ethnicity and the Nation-Building Project.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

马国男童画作吓坏老师! 真相其实是…

老师请小朋友们画全家福,不料老师看了一名男童的画作后当场傻眼,也担忧男童家里出了什么事情,马上联系家长! 马来西亚一名七岁男童,在课堂上画了这副画作,结果隔日男童父母就接到通知,要到学校和班主任见面。 男童告知父母,老师很生气,不喜欢他的作品。 隔日,班主任拿出男童画作,解释当时他吩咐同学们画全家福,结果男童竟交出这副作品。相信画作中的人偶是男童的家人,表情似乎痛苦,颈项疑似被“绳索吊起”。 班主任很担忧,男童家里是否遇到什么困难。男童母亲只好解释,其实家里也没问题,男童的画作只是要描绘他们一家人到登嘉楼棉花岛浮潜,原来所谓的“绳子”其实是冒着泡泡的呼吸管!令老师虚惊一场! 这件趣事也被网友Encik Zuy分享到脸书。

李显龙:暂不提升警戒级别至红色 料疫情可能持续一年或更久

我国总理李显龙第二度针对当前的疫情发表三语演说,在致词中他强调我国疫情仍受到控制,暂不打算将将警戒级别升级至红色,也不会像中国、韩国或意大利那样封城。 我国已针对中国、伊朗、韩国和意大利实施旅游管制,措施必须暂时进一步收紧,但却不能完全与世隔绝。他表示,目前我国时预先制定、试行更为严厉的措施,并确保国人已做好准备。 他坦言各地疫情爆发、病例上升,世卫组织也宣布疫情成为“大流行”,这意味着我国推行的一些措施必须可持续,例如勤洗手、保持新加坡清洁等;第二,减少社会接触的措施仍会继续。 “一直以来,我们的对策是及时发现、及时治疗,把病毒传播范围降至最低,但随着病毒在全球各地蔓延,我国预计会出现更多外国输入病例,本地也面对大规模感染群出现的风险,我国必须保持警惕,做好心理准备。” 他呼吁各界保持镇定、于政府合作,防疫措施才能保障大家安全。 他也指出,世卫组织曾提及疫情迅速扩散主要是各国未认真看待,惟他表示新加坡一直都认真看待疫情,“世卫组织也对我国努力作出表扬,誉为模范。” 数名国人出席吉隆坡宗教活动感染 他也提及,有数名国人前往吉隆坡参与大型宗教活动结果被感染。但他强调,问题不在宗教本身,而是病毒可以更快速传播,例如在宗教聚会,故此特呼吁各界减少类似聚会。 李显龙表示,我国需准备面对病例激增的现象,届时可能无法像目前那样,让所有病例住院或隔离。 “80巴仙仅出现轻微症状,其余重症患者多为年长者或先前已有其他疾病。”倘若出现大量病患,合理做法是让重症患者先住院,鼓励轻微症状病患到诊所就医和在家隔离。 但他强调任何新加坡人需要紧急治疗,肯定会受到照顾。 李显龙表示,政府将筹备下阶段经济配套,让企业能保持运营,确保疫情过去能恢复;让被裁员者、需要协助的人获得照顾。…

Netizens slam authority for light sentence given to policeman who was found guilty of molesting colleague

On Wednesday (8 April), a 29-year-old policeman who pleaded guilty for molesting…