Ng E-Jay/

Mr Chiam See Tong and Reform Party chief Kenneth Jeyaretnam during a joint walkabout at West Coast GRC on 16th March

Breaking the GRC barrier will be a crucial goal for the opposition in the next election. With so many pressing issues causing worry and frustration amongst Singaporeans – from foreigners, to housing prices, to the cost of living – there is not a better time for the opposition to finally put to rest the parliamentary dominance of the People’s Action Party (PAP).

Mr Chiam See Tong, Secretary-General of the Singapore People’s Party (SPP), was the first amongst the opposition representatives in Parliament to announce that he is stepping out of his Potong Pasir constituency to contest a GRC. Recently, it was also revealed that his wife Mrs Lina Chiam will be contesting Potong Pasir as his replacement.

The decision could not have been easy, and Mr Chiam surely knows the risks involved in such a move. Nonetheless, with age advancing on him, and having suffered a serious stroke, he must have also realized this is probably his last chance to leave behind a historical legacy – to be the first opposition candidate to win a GRC. Whether or not he does so, history will record that he was prepared to act for the greater good of the opposition, and also for the nation.

However there remains doubt as to where exactly he will be contesting. Last year, Mr Chiam indicated that he was interested in Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, and even went on a highly publicized joint walkabout there with the Reform Party’s (RP) Kenneth Jeyaretnam. More recently, during the opposition horse-trading talks, SPP staked its claim on Bishan-Toa Payoh, and it is widely believed that other parties which were originally also interested in Bishan-Toa Payoh deferred to SPP in this regard.

But in the middle of this week, the Reform Party posted a message on its Facebook page, together with photographs, revealing that Mr Chiam had joined them on an outreach activity in West Coast GRC. This story was also picked by Lianhe Zaobao on Friday.

According to the Zaobao article, Mr Chiam remains interested in Bishan-Toa Payoh, and he was quoted during a Meet-the-People’s session as saying that he has always yearned to contest there. In the article, reporter Yew Lun Tian also says Mr Chiam remains reluctant about joining Kenneth Jeyaretnam in West Coast, calling it an “electoral Siberia” (approximate English translation). The reporter speculates that an alternative option might be for Kenneth Jeyaretnam to join Mr Chiam in Bishan Toa-Payoh instead.

If both the leaders of SPP and RP join forces to gun down a GRC, it would make for a very interesting electoral battle indeed. As far as news reporting and voter attention is concerned, it may even eclipse the Workers’ Party (WP) gambit in Aljunied and the National Solidarity Party’s (NSP) contest in Tampines. Everyone will be enthralled by having two oppositionleaders in a single GRC team.

The million-dollar question that remains however is whether Chiam will join Jeyaretnam in West Coast, or whether Jeyaretnam will join Chiam in Bishan Toa-Payoh. It is conceivable that pride and ego is at stake here. The opposition leader who abandons his original plans and joins the other in the latter’s preferred constituency might be deemed as acknowledging that the other chap is politically stronger.

Ultimately it might come down to which side has more bargaining power. Mr Jeyaretnam’s party has recently been weakened by the mass exodus of 30 members, so RP cannot claim to have better resources. This is also Kenneth Jeyaretnam’s first electoral battle, and he must defer to Chiam as far as experience and political wit are concerned. However, one advantage that Mr Jeyaretnam has is the good name of his father, the late JB Jeyaretnam, who is revered by opposition supporters.

SDA's Desmond Lim

On the other hand, Mr Chiam has also been politically weakened by his public spat with Mr Desmond Lim, Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA), of which SPP had been a component party until last month.

Mr Chiam’s party also cannot boast of the kind of renewal and rejuvenation that have taken place in parties like the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), NSP and WP. Today, the SPP comprise primarily of veterans who have had years of electoral experience, but who are nowhere as prominent as opposition figureheads like Low, Chiam, Jeyaretnam, Sylvia Lim, Goh Meng Seng, or even rising stars like Vincent Wijeysingha and James Gomez of the SDP, or Eric Tan and Yaw Shin Leong of the WP.

It would be taxing for Mr Chiam to join Mr Jeyaretnam in West Coast GRC, as the area might be unfamiliar to him and it is far away from his Potong Pasir stronghold. However, one benefit of such an arrangement is that SPP’s resources can be freed up to assist Mrs Lina Chiam in her bid to secure PotongPasir – there is no guarantee at all that she will be victorious in her husband’s absence.

If Chiam joins Jeyaretnam in West Coast GRC, it will be to the long term advantage and benefit of RP, which would have put in a very memorable contest in that GRC, and laid a firm foundation for future electoral battles in that area regardless of the outcome of the 2011 contest.

In some sense, it would be a purely selfless act of Chiam. His party, the SPP, would not gain as much as RP or Kenneth Jeyaretnam. The public would likely remember Jeyaretnam, rather than Chiam, as the leader of the West Coast opposition challenge.

Which constituency Mr Chiam is really eyeing is anyone's guess- for now.

Given Chiam’s age and experience, and the fact that this is Jeyaretnam’s first electoral foray, some might argue that it would be more gentlemanly for Jeyaretnam to join Chiam in Bishan Toa-Payoh instead. The downside is that Bishan-Toa Payoh has traditionally been regarded as a PAP stronghold and the ground might not be as sweet as West Coast. The chances of victory could be slimmer, although in my personal assessment, the opposition team is likely to garner at least 40 per cent of the votes in Bishan-Toa Payoh.

There is one final outcome that few have considered – and that is whether Chiam will turn up at a GRC at all on Nomination Day itself. Given his state of health, he may well decide against contesting in a GRC altogether at the last moment. However, he would then be seen as backtracking on his earlier promise and it will not be good for his legacy.

Thus far, Chiam contesting in Bishan Toa-Payoh still remains the most likely scenario, but things are in a state of flux and come Nomination Day, Chiam may well pull out a surprise for everyone. I do not profess to know what the final outcome will be, but I hope it will be an exciting one.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The Internet’s reaction to PM’s speech

Some supportive and impressed, while others not so. (Update 2)

新大生偷拍女同事如厕仅判14天短期居留 控方要求增刑却被驳回

新大生在实习期间偷拍女同事如厕的画面,日前被判14天短期拘留令,然而控方认为刑罚应再加重,向法庭上诉却被驳回,法官指在改造和惩罚之间应该取得平衡。 根据案情所述,被告云齐桐(音译,Hoon Qi Tong)为25岁新加坡管理大学学生,目前于中央商业区一家公司实习,已毕业。 案情显示,被告于2017年8月开始实习,并出现偷拍女同事裙底的习惯,随后他对裙底视频不感兴趣,于是转向偷拍女同事如厕。 被告于2017年9月13日帮网跟踪一名女同事到女厕外,并躲进隔间,站在马桶上,用手机从上拍女同事如厕画面,即被女同事发现,并要求交出手机给对方检查和删掉视频。 随后被告认罪,被判14天短期拘留令与130个小时的社区服务,对此,控方认为短期拘留令的目的在于改造因素大于惩罚因素,是为了低风险的罪犯所施予的惩罚,以让被告不受监禁的污名。 不过鉴于被告的情况,在犯下罪行时已年届23岁的成年人,明显上述刑罚不足,因此刑罚应居于阻吓和惩罚为基础。 控方也指出,被告告诉精神科医生,他即希望偷拍时被抓,借此摆脱性癖好,但在女同事发现后又出现求饶的行为,其口供可信度不足,因此质疑他受到刑罚的成效,要求法官判被告坐牢至少八周。 高庭法官则指出,要同时顾及社会利益与惩罚的尺度实属不易,因此国家法院法官判处被告短期拘留令,是在改造与惩罚间取得平衡,故此认为是正确的刑罚,驳回上诉。

【武汉冠状病毒】马国政府禁止口罩出口

邻国马来西亚的武汉冠状病毒确诊病例已累计55例,为了确保当地有足够的口罩使用,马国卫生总监拿督诺希山宣布将禁止当地口罩出境。 综合马国媒体报道,日前该国政府还暂无意禁止厂商出口口罩,惟将商议提高口罩产量,以应付国人的需求。 但随着疫情的蔓延,马来西亚卫生部表示如今已进入第二波冠状病毒疫情,因此新冠肺炎疫情委员会议决,将口罩宪报颁布为2020年统制品(禁止出口)条例名单。 诺希山说,这是为了确保口罩足以应付本地的需求量。 随着中国境外的疫情愈发严重,各国也提出各项口罩措施。 台湾已与1月24日宣布管制2类型口罩出口一个月,亦是率先提出禁止口罩出口的地区;而泰国则于2月4日统一采取因应措施,尽可能减少医用口罩出口,并将口罩和洗手液等列为“管制商品以防止国内供应短缺”。 法国于3月3日签署政令,在未来几个月征用所有防护性口罩的库存与生产;俄罗斯与德国则紧随其后,3月4日起禁止口罩、呼吸器和防护服等医疗用品出口;韩国在爆发疫情后,于3月6日全面禁止口罩及口罩关键原料出口,禁令有限至6月30日。 而我国对于口罩措施,则选择采取“积极步骤“,加强供应链的伸缩性,同时也呼吁国人勤洗手、监测体温,以及不碰触自己的脸颊,但也未采取限制口罩出境。截至今日,口罩仍处于供不应求的状态。 目前我国确诊病例已累计117人。

建国一代老人露宿逾两月 毕博渊归咎“体制疏忽”欠人文关怀

政治工作者毕博渊日前揭露,一名建国一代年长者,被迫在红山景熟食中心露宿逾两个月。 毕博渊在3月20日的一则脸书贴文中透露,这名名为林启坤(译音)老人的境遇,是“制度规划不当”和“体制疏忽”下的受害者。 他说,过去的林启坤,也曾住在租赁组屋,但是他被安排和一位不相识的年长者同居。这位屋友患有中风而行动不便,结果林启坤还要负责照顾他,无形中增加额外经济负担,也没有其他人可以介入帮忙。 63岁曾入狱 林启坤因为经济压力,走投无路下一时行差踏错去犯罪,结果在63岁那年,被判监禁10年。后因行为良好,在不久前他获准提早出狱,现已70岁的他,出狱后却无处可去,只好露宿小贩中心。 毕博渊补充,林启坤还有位哥哥,但似乎因为一些建屋局的条规,他们俩无法住在一起。林启坤哥哥在八年前卖掉组屋,但是根据建屋局条规,似乎卖掉组屋10年内,都不能跟政府申请租屋。 毕博渊也声称,林启坤曾向丹绒巴葛集选区议员祖安清心和建屋发展局求助,但都未得到回音。 “照老人的描述,各个单位只是跟他阐述各种条规,如踢球般把他转给其他部门或议员,却没有解决方案。比起一位急需救助的建国一代老人,他们似乎更重视繁文缛节,显得缺乏人文关怀。” 毕博渊说,他所理解的祖安清心应是有爱心的人,何以在她选区之下,却无法为老人做到任何事情? 建屋局:今年一月已接洽老人 针对毕博渊的质问,建屋局则在本月27日发文澄清,毕博渊指没有公共机构对林启坤伸出援手,是不确实的。 建屋局指出,该局和社会及家庭发展部旗下的社会服务中心,早在今年一月就已接洽并了解林启坤的处境。在本月1日就19日,也接获祖安清心针对林启坤租屋申请的跟进询问。…