by Leong Sze Hian

Panelists Dr Tan Khee Giap, Chris De Souza and Desmond Foo

I refer to the remarks made at the YPAP budget forum “Working to win in Singapore’s economy ahead”.

“No Singaporean who wants a job will be denied work”?

One of the panelist, Dr Tan Khee Giap claimed that no Singaporean who wants a job “will be denied work”.

According to the Ministry of Manpower’s (MOM) Singapore Workforce 2010 Report, Service and Sales workers had the highest unemployment rate of 5.5 per cent, among all categories of workers.

So, does this mean that even locals who worked as “waiters, waitresses, chambermaids”, and lost their jobs, had difficulty getting re-employed in these same jobs?

Why? To what extent has our liberal foreign worker policies contributed to this?

Count job rejections?

Dr Tan also suggested, “The authorities (should) publish a quarterly report to note how many times the worker was referred a job, and monitor how many times the particular worker rejected it.”

Comparing the MOM’s Job Vacancies 2009 and 2010 Reports, the 25th percentile gross wage of waiters decreased from $930 to $879.

So, if Dr Tan is retrenched, and is offered a job as a waiter, would he take it?

If he keeps rejecting job offers as a waiter, wouldn’t he be not helping in regard to his own remarks – “if you do that (count job rejections) the unemployment rate can be reduced to one per cent”?

“Nanny state” Budget?

I find it somewhat odd to cite the 2008 and 2009 special transfers statistics to support the statement that “the 2011 Budget is not a General Elections Budget but rather a ‘Nanny State Budget'”.

Weren’t these Singapore’s worst recession years, and therefore may have had exceptional spending in special transfers to help Singaporeans?

Why not give us the amounts for the other “normal” years, like 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007, 2010, etc?

WIS

As to his claims that “the Workfare Income Supplement scheme (WIS) is good enough”, it only applies to those age 35 and above.

What about the about one in eight workers who earn not more than $1,000, according to the Census 2010 Report, and the 400,100 workers who earn not more than $1,200, according to the MOM’s Report on Labour Force in Singapore 2010, who are below 35 years old?

Foreign worker levy

As to the statement that foreign worker levies are rechanneled to government training programmer such as E2i (Employment and Employability Institute) and SPUR (Skills Programme for Upgrading and
Resilience), SPUR was a once-off measure during the last recession, and total government training programmes’ spending has been but a fraction of the billions of foreign worker levies collected.

Helping children?

With regard to Desmond Choo’s reply on whether the Budget helps to provide for couples with children, that children up to six years old will get $300 to $400 each, how much help is a few hundred dollars?

Mr Choo said “the issue is whether we are investing enough per child, i.e. quality time and so on”. 579,864 resident workers or about 31 per cent of all resident workers, worked at least 50 hours (228,856, 73,761, 134,716 and 142,551 worked between 50-54, 55-59, 60-64 and 65 hours and over).

So, some may not have much “quality time” left to spend with their children!

Foreign talent?

As for Mr Choo’s response to the issue of the foreign talent policy, that “Singaporeans should focus instead on how to ‘future-proof’ themselves”, through continual skills upgrading, how do Singaporeans compete with much more educated, qualified and experienced foreigners who are prepared to work for much less pay than Singapreans?

Support TOC! Buy Leong Sze Hian’s book here!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

没戴好口罩被劝导 男子反呛:你是哪里人

在巴士上,一名男子将口罩拉到下巴处,他人劝请他将口罩戴好时,他却大声地反问,“你是哪里人?”。 有网民于10月9日在All Singapore Stuff脸书群组内,分享一段于晚上时分,在巴士上拍下的视频。视频中只见一名身穿黑衣牛仔裤的男子坐在巴士后座,将黑色的口罩拉到了下巴处,因此被他人劝导将口罩戴好。 岂知男子却反问一句,“你是哪里人?”。在听到对方回答是新加坡人时,他回应道,“新加坡人又怎样?我也是新加坡人”,最后还以粗口回应。 视频至今已经吸引了985人给出反应,434个评论。不少网民都认为巴士车长应该使用车长权力,在男子还没上巴士之前,就应该纠正对方没有戴好口罩,否则不让对方上车;甚至在男子不愿配合的时候,让对方下车。 有者则建议让巴士公司增派驻守人员,或让安全距离大使到巴士上“驻守”,确保巴士乘客都有遵守安全措施,因为有许多乘客在巴士上通电话时,都会取下口罩。

High Court Judgement for Section 377A

In the judgement for the case of Gary Lim Meng Suang and Kenneth…

第二阶段解封措施首日 李显龙吁民众勿过度欢庆

总理李显龙呼吁民众,切勿因解封迈入第二阶段就过分兴奋,仍需保持警惕,遵守安全预防措施,保持社交距离,戴上口罩。 今日(19日)为第二阶段解封措施实施首日,总理李显龙亦在脸书上上传自己在家中所拍摄的天空,并配上文字表示,全国人民都期待今日的到来,因为这是自阻断措施实施以来,最接近常态生活的状态,但也呼吁民众勿过分庆祝,要随时保持警惕。 “第二阶段解封措施今日开始,我相信,全国人民都期待今日的带来,但也不必为之欢庆,在第二阶段,仍需戴上口罩和保持社交距离。” 对于第一阶段解封措施,他表示很高兴看到民众都严正以待,在第一阶段时,各地都采取了严谨的预防措施,因此当进入第二阶段时,也请务必保持警惕。 “我很高兴大多数人都认真对待,在第一阶段时采取必要的措施。当新加坡逐步解封时,也请民众保持警惕。如果我们能够尽好自己的责任,不仅能够保护自己,也能保护其他人。”

Phey Yew Kok read 28 additional charges in State Courts

Phey Yew Kok, a former Member of Parliament and chairman of National…