The following is an excerpt of  article posted on March 9, 2011 on the blog De Leviathan.

The following article is contributed to the Singapore General Election Portal (SGEP). The articles refered to herein can be found in the SGEP.

The Digital Warfare in Electoral Battle

The Editorial , “The Electoral Battle Is Shaping Up” [Editorials (In Focus) – Archives]; highlighted an article in The Star Online, “PAP enters the digital warfare” [5 Mar 2011 – Malaysia Media].

While both the Incumbent and Opposition parties are adopting the new media to varying extent in their electoral battle, how is the external environment influencing this media to shape the electoral battle ground? To what extent will the final outcome be influenced by “digital warfare”?

The Singapore Social Media Training Blog [Government & Social Media; 7 Mar 2011] said:
“For the past few years, The Singapore Government has been trying to get on social media. However, they do not welcome feedback and censor comments”….. “if any nation, company or individuals is interested in Social Media, they need to be prepared to engage — accept both positive and negative feedback, and willingly resolve the issues transparently”….. “With the coming elections, there are more ministers with blogs and Facebook pages, but the engagement is heavily moderated, and the types of posts do not seem genuine and engaging as well.”

It also quoted a deputy director of LTA to have said in a different context:
“The Singapore government, as a whole, is not averse to using new media. We’re not ruling out the opportunities it presents us. But we’re not completely sure how to use it yet.”

If this is so, will the new media be restricted only to the few MPs and Ministers who are familiar but are still afraid to engage or have heavily moderated their postings? The adverse publicity of the YPAP in some past events could be a deterrent.

If we judge the Blogosphere, it looks certain the PAP will continue to use the mainstream media (MSM) to anchor its campaign and leave the MSM to decide whether to adopt the new media. Hence, the outcome will be left more to conventional campaigning and rally.
Too much reliance on the MSM would tilt the playing ground if they were managed by the incumbent PAP Govt. The new media is now looked upon as the better tool and place for “freedom of expression”, as demonstrated by Netizens craving to flood the Blogosphere with a never-ending stream of opinions.

Although the new media is freer for expressing opinions, it becomes pertinent to interpret “opinions” to see the logics within.

The TODAY newspaper published a commentary captioned “Deep fissures behind Opposition bravado” [7 Mar 2011- Local Media] by Mr. Eugene Tan, an SMU Assistant Professor of Law. Let’s take a closer look at the choice of words.

While first part of the article provides a good analytical review of the Electorate in general, the second part of the critical review with a sub-title “STALEMATE AND DISARRAY” together the main caption “Deep fissures behind Opposition bravado” would have casted doubts, or even aspersions; to put the Opposition in deeper waters. Why is it so?

Firstly, “deep fissures” would suggest “irreparable damage” within the Opposition parties. An intelligent Electorate must look deeper, wider and even beyond what an analyst has to say. Are the signals really “deep fissures” or are they just “superficial hairline cracks”? His commentary was written after the second pow-wow last Saturday (5 Mar 2011) evening [Opposition Inter-Party Conference 2; 3 Mar 2011 – Events]

As pointed out in the last posting of In Focus, the interesting thing is whether a sequel will develop further to the initial infighting. But just look at the relative ease the SDA had given up a 3-cornered fight at Potong Pasir out of “goodwill basis” and“doing it for the purpose of opposition unity and also to give due respect to Chiam See Tong.”

The “disarray” might look irreconcilable to an analyst, but its final resolution was so “organic” and this is probably the way how our Opposition Parties work. [SPP to fight PAP ‘one-to-one’ in Potong Pasir SMC; 7 Mar 2011 – Local Media] ”]To read on, click here.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

遭假公安要挟 学生自导自演绑架案索赎金

一名15岁学生日前接获假公安来电,指他涉嫌洗黑钱,并要求他交钱转账到中国的银行账户。学生在迫于无奈下只好与骗徒联手,自导自演绑架案,向父母索取两万人民币(约4045新元)的赎金。 据《海峡时报》报导,警方日前接获一起疑似中学生遭绑架案,经调查后,发现是学生自导自演的绑架事件。 该名学生接获了一名自称是中国公安的电话,指控学生涉嫌洗黑钱,并已对他发出逮捕令。若想要撤销逮捕令,就必须将钱汇至中国的银行户口。 由于转账数额太大,学生无法支付,在迫于无奈下,学生选择联手骗徒,自导自演一起绑架案来获得赎金。骗徒还向学生下达指令,于本月1日一间位于乌节路的酒店里,捆绑自己并拍照,期间不得与任何人联系。最后再将照片传给位于中国的父母,要求他们将赎金汇入中国的指定银行户口。 父母转账两万人民币至“假公安”户口 而该名学生父母在得知此事后,立即联系学生,但联系不上,非常害怕,马上转账两万人民币到假公安的指定户口,随即通知孩子在本地的监护人。监护人随后也向警方报案,警方对此展开调查,最后在酒店房间内发现学生。 据悉,该名学生为中国籍学生,目前就读新加坡,而我国警察目前也与中国公安积极合作,调查此案。 警方对此事件,表示将严正以待任何涉及故意或非故意诈骗行为,一旦涉嫌诈骗行为将会被接受调查。 此外,警方也强调,任何政府部门都不会采取电话或社交媒体如Whatsapp 、微信与民众交涉,更不会向民众索取个人银行账户与密码。民众应注意别随意泄露个人资料及转账。 若外籍人士接获自称来自祖国的警察人员通知,也请到大使馆或最高官员公署确认。 若有更多关于类似诈骗案的线索,可拨通警方热线1800-2550000或999寻求紧急协助以及提供资料。欲了解更多诈骗详情,可上网到www.scamalert.sg浏览或拨打反诈骗热线电话1800-7226688。

Trying alternatives instead of flogging the dead train.

By Terry Xu  A Straits Times Article report “Year-long trial on weekdays at…

荷兰村冲突事件 二涉案青年被逮捕

荷兰村上周五(6月19)发生冲突事件,两名涉案青年被逮捕。 警方昨日(6月21日)发文告指出,基于涉嫌参与上周五晚上10时50分在荷兰村发生的冲突事件,警方昨日将两名同为22岁的青年逮捕。 该事件中,一名26岁的男子涉嫌在罗弄曼蒙(Lorong Mambong)滋扰民众,随后被警方依据酒类管制法令(Liquor Control Act)逮捕。 和以上的两名男子一起,警方将依循冠状病毒(临时援助措施)管制令,对三名涉案人士展开调查。  

ST report on Bukit Brown "concessions" erroneous: SHS

The following is from the Singapore Heritage Society’s Facebook page: On 12…