The following is an excerpt of  article posted on March 9, 2011 on the blog De Leviathan.

The following article is contributed to the Singapore General Election Portal (SGEP). The articles refered to herein can be found in the SGEP.

The Digital Warfare in Electoral Battle

The Editorial , “The Electoral Battle Is Shaping Up” [Editorials (In Focus) – Archives]; highlighted an article in The Star Online, “PAP enters the digital warfare” [5 Mar 2011 – Malaysia Media].

While both the Incumbent and Opposition parties are adopting the new media to varying extent in their electoral battle, how is the external environment influencing this media to shape the electoral battle ground? To what extent will the final outcome be influenced by “digital warfare”?

The Singapore Social Media Training Blog [Government & Social Media; 7 Mar 2011] said:
“For the past few years, The Singapore Government has been trying to get on social media. However, they do not welcome feedback and censor comments”….. “if any nation, company or individuals is interested in Social Media, they need to be prepared to engage — accept both positive and negative feedback, and willingly resolve the issues transparently”….. “With the coming elections, there are more ministers with blogs and Facebook pages, but the engagement is heavily moderated, and the types of posts do not seem genuine and engaging as well.”

It also quoted a deputy director of LTA to have said in a different context:
“The Singapore government, as a whole, is not averse to using new media. We’re not ruling out the opportunities it presents us. But we’re not completely sure how to use it yet.”

If this is so, will the new media be restricted only to the few MPs and Ministers who are familiar but are still afraid to engage or have heavily moderated their postings? The adverse publicity of the YPAP in some past events could be a deterrent.

If we judge the Blogosphere, it looks certain the PAP will continue to use the mainstream media (MSM) to anchor its campaign and leave the MSM to decide whether to adopt the new media. Hence, the outcome will be left more to conventional campaigning and rally.
Too much reliance on the MSM would tilt the playing ground if they were managed by the incumbent PAP Govt. The new media is now looked upon as the better tool and place for “freedom of expression”, as demonstrated by Netizens craving to flood the Blogosphere with a never-ending stream of opinions.

Although the new media is freer for expressing opinions, it becomes pertinent to interpret “opinions” to see the logics within.

The TODAY newspaper published a commentary captioned “Deep fissures behind Opposition bravado” [7 Mar 2011- Local Media] by Mr. Eugene Tan, an SMU Assistant Professor of Law. Let’s take a closer look at the choice of words.

While first part of the article provides a good analytical review of the Electorate in general, the second part of the critical review with a sub-title “STALEMATE AND DISARRAY” together the main caption “Deep fissures behind Opposition bravado” would have casted doubts, or even aspersions; to put the Opposition in deeper waters. Why is it so?

Firstly, “deep fissures” would suggest “irreparable damage” within the Opposition parties. An intelligent Electorate must look deeper, wider and even beyond what an analyst has to say. Are the signals really “deep fissures” or are they just “superficial hairline cracks”? His commentary was written after the second pow-wow last Saturday (5 Mar 2011) evening [Opposition Inter-Party Conference 2; 3 Mar 2011 – Events]

As pointed out in the last posting of In Focus, the interesting thing is whether a sequel will develop further to the initial infighting. But just look at the relative ease the SDA had given up a 3-cornered fight at Potong Pasir out of “goodwill basis” and“doing it for the purpose of opposition unity and also to give due respect to Chiam See Tong.”

The “disarray” might look irreconcilable to an analyst, but its final resolution was so “organic” and this is probably the way how our Opposition Parties work. [SPP to fight PAP ‘one-to-one’ in Potong Pasir SMC; 7 Mar 2011 – Local Media] ”]To read on, click here.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Error spotted on SAFRA’s monthly magazine

By Terry Xu Spot any error on this print out? Well, someone…

Gojek driver in the viral ‘kidnap’ video allowed to drive pending LTA decision

The Gojek driver involved in the viral ‘kidnap’ video will be allowed…

居民家中冰箱故障 善心人赠二手冰箱应急!

工人党盛港集选区议员林志蔚分享,安谷区一名居民努莱达女士,家中冰柜在周日突然故障,担忧孩子的奶和家中食物无法保存,只得向议员求助。 尽管是临时通知,但工人党志工却在短时间内动员起来,找到志愿者捐赠的二手电冰箱,还找到了能帮忙载送冰箱和搬运的志工。 尽管当天下着雨,他们还是成功把冰箱送达努莱达女士家中,暂解燃眉之急。 林志蔚坦言,在帮助居民过程尽管都有挑战,不过看到有成果都会让人感欣慰,志工们的奉献精神也让他赞叹。 在工人党社区基金下,持续推动“蓝色环保”(BlueCycle)活动,鼓励民众捐出物品,帮助社区中有需要的居民。 Sometimes helping residents can involve a scramble,…

内政部驳斥针对马国囚犯批评 指我国法律前人人平等

内政部否认针对马来西亚囚犯执行死刑的指控,并强调我国法律是同等对待所有人,无论罪犯是本地人或外国人。 当局是针对马国媒体报导指,我国数次拒绝了对被判处死刑的马国毒犯给予宽大请愿一事,做出回应。 内政部发言人于周末(7月13日)回复媒体询问时指出,“所有到访或居住在新加坡的外国人都必须遵守我们的法律,如果他们选择违反我国法律,就必须准备接受法律对付”。 “我国拥有强大的法治力量和独立的司法制度。无论是什么国籍,只要是违法者,包括被判处死刑的罪犯,均依据法律进行正当程序。” 内政部指出,当一名罪犯被判处死刑时,他可以向我国总统提交请愿书,而这将根据其特殊情况或优势进行仔细考量。 至于已经提交的请愿书,总统会在《宪法》第22条文下,根据内阁的建议,决定是否给予刑事宽恕权。《宪法》第22条例规定了给予赦免的规章。 内政部指出,每个国家都有决定,根据各别情况行驶死刑的主权。当然,我国继续使用死刑的决定,也受到国内外维护人权团体的批评。 “根据正当的法律程序强制执行死刑,并没有达到国际共识……我国尊重其他国家决定自家法律制度的主权行使,也期望获得同样的回报。” 马国媒体于上周五(7月12日)报导,指该国四名毒犯的请愿书被拒绝,目前在樟宜监狱面临死刑。 据马来西亚捍卫自由律师团(Lawyers for Liberty)发文告指出,该四名囚犯,也在10名向总统申请特赦的囚犯行列。…