The following is a letter sent to us by a TOC reader.

Source: transitioning.org

Me and my wife had a conversation a few days ago. I was telling her that with the current government policies on importing foreign workers from abroad, our children (age 4,6), ourselves (age 31,35), our parents (ages 50s to 60s) will be facing many challenges ahead. My wife asked me to explain.

Our children – they will face more competiton from their peers in school. As demand for more places come from children of Permanent Residents (PR), places in school will be affected and whether or not our children will be left out is still unknown. Pressure on the parents to make sure their children do well will arise. I am not saying that competition is bad but for some good primary schools or secondary schools, there are limited places available. With the influx of PR children, in one way or another, our Singaporean children will be affected. My wife agreed.

Ourselves – working adults having spent 10 years in the same company. With our gradual increase in salary annually, we will be deemed more expensive compared to the new foreign workers.

When will such government policies affect us? I am not sure but after reading many stories in the news, many Singaporeans are being displaced and adults in their 40s are having difficulty securing jobs. Why? Simply because employers have more options to employ cheaper and younger workers. This is where our government should do much more to protect the jobs of Singaporeans.

Recently, two families of Philippines PRs moved in next door. The mother of one of the families was working as a sales co-ordinator at a retail shop and the father working odd jobs. The second family was a larger one, with members – I suppose – working entry level jobs. I thought to myself: what the hell are they doing here? Are they the “foreign talents” mentioned to us by our government?

By the way, I read somewhere (need to clarify) that PRs can rent out their flat immediately whereas Singaporeans need to stay for a few years before renting out. Is this true?

Our parents – they face competition even more than us. They are old and are easily replaced by their employers. The same issues occurs. Employers can easily get cheaper, younger foreign workers to do their work. Again, the government CAN and SHOULD do more for our elderly citizens. How? As long as our government wants to do it, they CAN do it.

One interesting observation from me. Everyday I see old PRCs (I assume they are parents of Chinese PRs) collecting old cardboards and cans in my estate. So it seems even our own Singaporean garung gunis are facing competition.

I really think our government should see what is happening on the ground.

Alvin Ho

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Campaign the Singapore Government to stop producing cluster bombs

Why S’poreans should be concerned.

起诉许渊臣诽谤诉讼 总理将出庭供证

总理李显龙将在起诉《网络公民》总编许渊臣的诽谤诉讼,选择出庭供证。 总理新闻秘书张俪霖是在昨晚(10日)发文告如是表示。 张俪霖称,如案件开审,总理会选择出庭供证,是因为对他的指控是不实的。 她表示总理弟妹也可与许渊臣一起决定,届时是否一同作证,在法庭上重复对总理的指控。之后由法庭来辨明事实。 在本月1日,总理新闻新闻秘书张俪霖,代表总理向本社总编许渊臣发函,指本社英语站在8月15日刊登的一篇评论,复述针对总理的不实指控,要求本社撤下并在三日内道歉。 许渊臣则在9月4日答复总理,认为有关评论文章不含诽谤性,而是根据可能对事件知情的总理家人此前发表的公开声明,也有鉴于涉及公共利益问题,为了能避免造成疑虑,只能重新复述总理弟妹曾说过的话。 本月5日起诉本社总编许渊臣,后者在当天收到代表总理李显龙的达文星律师楼( Davinder Singh Chambers LLC)寄来的原告诉状和法庭传票。 诉状中对本社英语站发表的有关文章提出异议,指该文章作出不实和无根据,并且贬低和诋毁总理。 不过,针对要求移除文章和无条件作出道歉,以及承诺不在《网络公民》刊登类似的指控,许渊臣则婉拒了这些要求。…

面对四控状 男律师涉非礼偷拍裙底照

知法犯法,年轻男律师在任职的律师事务所内,被指涉及非礼和偷拍年轻女律师三次,面对四项控状。 以优秀成绩毕业于本地大学,在德尊律师事务所(Drew & Napier)任职的年轻男律师,于昨日(11月11日)被控一项非礼罪以及三项侮辱女性尊严罪名。 他全部不认罪。 受害者和被告的名字都在法官的谕令下,不得公布于媒体上,以起到保护受害者作用。 据法庭文件指出,案发时,被告和三名受害者都在同一家律师事务所工作,目前被告已经辞职,到另一家律师事务所就职。 控状指出,被告于2017年4月份,晚上8时许在公司内偷拍受害者的胸口内衣和裙底风光,此为被告首次干案。 在同年10月,被告再次涉及偷拍受害者的裙底照,甚至用其大腿触碰受害者的手臂。 指调查官诱导认罪 昨天在庭上,调查官招供时指出,指被告在去年11月录口供时,承认犯案,但是如今却反指调查官诱导他录口供,因此不承认有关的口供。 法庭因此发起审讯中的审讯,以便确定有关的口供是否能作为呈堂证据。…