The following is a letter sent to us by a TOC reader.

Source: transitioning.org

Me and my wife had a conversation a few days ago. I was telling her that with the current government policies on importing foreign workers from abroad, our children (age 4,6), ourselves (age 31,35), our parents (ages 50s to 60s) will be facing many challenges ahead. My wife asked me to explain.

Our children – they will face more competiton from their peers in school. As demand for more places come from children of Permanent Residents (PR), places in school will be affected and whether or not our children will be left out is still unknown. Pressure on the parents to make sure their children do well will arise. I am not saying that competition is bad but for some good primary schools or secondary schools, there are limited places available. With the influx of PR children, in one way or another, our Singaporean children will be affected. My wife agreed.

Ourselves – working adults having spent 10 years in the same company. With our gradual increase in salary annually, we will be deemed more expensive compared to the new foreign workers.

When will such government policies affect us? I am not sure but after reading many stories in the news, many Singaporeans are being displaced and adults in their 40s are having difficulty securing jobs. Why? Simply because employers have more options to employ cheaper and younger workers. This is where our government should do much more to protect the jobs of Singaporeans.

Recently, two families of Philippines PRs moved in next door. The mother of one of the families was working as a sales co-ordinator at a retail shop and the father working odd jobs. The second family was a larger one, with members – I suppose – working entry level jobs. I thought to myself: what the hell are they doing here? Are they the “foreign talents” mentioned to us by our government?

By the way, I read somewhere (need to clarify) that PRs can rent out their flat immediately whereas Singaporeans need to stay for a few years before renting out. Is this true?

Our parents – they face competition even more than us. They are old and are easily replaced by their employers. The same issues occurs. Employers can easily get cheaper, younger foreign workers to do their work. Again, the government CAN and SHOULD do more for our elderly citizens. How? As long as our government wants to do it, they CAN do it.

One interesting observation from me. Everyday I see old PRCs (I assume they are parents of Chinese PRs) collecting old cardboards and cans in my estate. So it seems even our own Singaporean garung gunis are facing competition.

I really think our government should see what is happening on the ground.

Alvin Ho

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

FIFA scrutinises S’pore Govt’s interference in football association

In a report by Yahoo Singapore on Thursday, the world football governing…

Scoot apologises for mistakenly sending emails about COVID-19 testing to passengers who are not on China flight; says “no data breach” involved

Singapore’s low-cost airline Scoot has issued an apology for mistakenly sending emails…

贸工部:CECA没开方便之门! 让印度国民自动成狮城公民

贸工部发言人重申,新印全面经济合作协议(CECA),并没有让印度国民能自动成为新加坡公民、永久居民,或是自动发出就业准证等。 贸工部称有关说法具误导性,任何通过CECA或其他自贸协议,前来我国工作的外籍人士,都需要符合本地的就业准证条例。 在CECA下,允许跨国公司内部人员调动专才入境,但都要符合本地的条例。 贸工部发言人称,通过该途径来新的就业准证持有者不到五巴仙,通过企业内部调动,到我国工作的外籍人士来自不同国家,印籍人士只占一小部分。 事实上,这已不是该部第一次作出这种澄清声明。早在去年11月,贸工部长陈振声就声称,CECA没给印度国民“开方便之门”,然而为何他的说词至今无法说服国人? 再者,即便故总理兼经济政策统筹部长王瑞杰,也在之前的一次对话会上,承认居民关注樟宜商业园充斥外籍人士的情况。 但即便如此,王瑞杰仍坚称,签署CECA协议是为了创造更多美好生活和工作给新加坡人。

盛港议员周末走访居民 还顺便到白沙榜鹅市镇会串门

据盛港集选区议员何廷儒在脸书分享,该选区议员团队,本周末到第266座咖啡店一带拜访居民。 包括辣玉莎、林志蔚和蔡庆威三人,都一同走基层了解民情。目前,何廷儒担任盛港市镇会主席,蔡庆威为副主席。 何廷儒表示,居民关心疫情持续下对经济的影响,同时也有意了解,副总理财长王瑞杰提及,新生儿一次性补助金的详情。居民也建议提升选区内的居民日常通行便利。 除了拜访选民,四人也不忘到邻近的白沙-榜鹅市镇会“串门”打招呼。 何廷儒负责万国(Buangkok)分区、林志蔚负责安谷(Anchorvale)、辣玉莎负责的康埔桦(Compassvale),蔡庆威负责的河谷(Rivervale)。