The following post is published on February 23, 2011 on Mr Ravi Philemon’s blog.


The governments solution for solving social problems is by either throwing money at them or by taking money away from them.  You have a TFR (total fertility rate) problem and what do you do? Throw money at the married people to induce them to have children.  You have a problem with employers relying too much on foreign workers and what do you do? Take more money from the employers for hiring the foreign workers. That is as creative as the government gets in solving social problems.

Why can’t they be as creative they are with commercial problems? They run out of space for oil storage and what do they do? They  build caverns under the sea to store them. I mean we need more out of the box solution like the caverns under the sea thing for social problems as well.  Don’t just try to solve everything by throwing money at it or by squeezing money out of it.

Thinking out of the box, I think the TFR problem can be solved if you provided free education from pre-school right up to college.  By providing 2 months of maternity leave and 4 more months of childcare leave (which can be taken by either the father or the mother) for every child born. And by providing free medical care for the child until he or she turns 21.  On top of this, you throw-in free childcare and/or student-care with free tuition for the weaker students.  And don’t forget to create more open spaces for the young ones to run, play and have fun. I am pretty sure that these will be far better inducements for Singaporeans to go forth and multiply.

Instead of relying on simplistic solution to solve the problem of too much foreign worker, the government could have adopted a quota system where the need of foreign labour is determined by  supply and demand for labour in that particular industry. The shortfall between the estimated demand and domestic supply would represent the foreign labour requirement, which will then form the basis of determining the quota level.

And is the Productivity and Innovation Credit (PIC) scheme (a tax rebate scheme to encourage companies to raise productivity) going to help mitigate the higher levies for the employers? I doubt because PIC favours those in high-value sectors like pharmaceuticals more.

More of my thoughts on Singapore Budget 2011 is HERE.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

COVID-19 has shown the weakness of systems that have failed to place a central focus on upholding human rights, says UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

The key factor in turning this disaster of a pandemic into an…

Personal travel to resume mid of this year but business travel will take time, says IATA director

Those who wish to travel abroad for holiday or wish to reunite…

乔立盟冀把詹时中的精神传递下去

“就像过去当我们最需要的时候,詹时中出现在我们身边,过去两年我也把时间投入在协助波东巴西居民,为他们点燃希望和尽我所能提供帮助。” 就像詹时中如何帮助那些有需要的人,人民党乔立盟(Jose Raymond)认为应该把前者的精神继续传递下去。 人民党刚在昨晚召开两年一度的党大会暨中委改选。乔立盟也是当选中委之一。在昨晚的脸书贴文,乔立盟似乎向往詹时中的信念,表示政治乃个人选择而他将尽其所能帮助有需要的人。 人民党秘书长暨前波东巴西议员詹时中,未参与昨日的中委改选,这意味着已担任人民党秘书长长达23年的他,将卸下党职务。 根据人民党今日在脸书发的贴文,向詹时中致意,感谢他长期以来为该党和新加坡做出的贡献。 乔立盟忆述1984年,他还是13岁的小伙子,就陪同父亲,聆听民主党创党人詹时中的竞选政治讲座,感受选民的热情。后者在该年赢得波东巴西国会议席。 四年后,在詹时中的竞选集会,乔立盟帮助父亲派发竞选宣言给信立新村居民。“我的父亲开了一辆蓝色小卡车,我则就坐在后面把传单传给他派发,至今我还保留着父亲当时穿着的民主党T恤。” 乔立盟展示一张1984年,詹时中中选时的热闹场面,红格中右三为乔立盟父亲。 但是真正影响乔立盟政治信仰的,还要回溯到1990年的一件事。当时,乔立盟一家不敷偿还抵押金,导致房屋发展局要拉回他们在西裕廊的组屋单位,乔立盟的父亲只好硬着头皮向詹时中求助。 詹时中当时二话不说,就签了支票帮乔立盟一家偿还了组屋押金,他们一家才免受流离失所之苦。詹的无私和真诚慷慨助人,使乔立盟深深敬仰,决心继承这种奉献精神,辅助社会弱势群体。 此后有26年两人没有再见面,直到2016年9月,在设立詹时中体育基金时才久别重逢。尽管许多人都不知道他们已有20余载的情谊,惟至今乔立盟仍保留着那张1984年大选时,詹时中竞选集会的照片,缅怀过去的光辉岁月。…