The following is a letter from a TOC reader.

To: The Online Citizen

I used to enjoy reading TOC. Compared to say TR, TOC used to offer more balanced
views and more constructive ideas. However, in recent weeks, I have become
increasingly disappointed with TOC, in particular with the posts by Mr Leong Sze
Hian.

Mr Leong’s posts are predictable. He would quote various statistics and
then make statements that invariably conclude that the Government is not doing
enough. But beyond say pushing for a minimum wage (which is in itself a divided
topic even amongst academics) Mr Leong seldom offers constructive ideas. Mr
Leong is critical, to the extent that his posts show his belief that the
Government can do no right. Take for example his most recent posts on the
Budget. Mr Leong has in the past argued that there are too many foreign workers
who depress the wages of local low-wage workers. Now that the foreign worker
levy is being increased in order to stem the demand for foreign workers, Mr
Leong says that this is also bad as it will also reduce the wages of locals.

It would have been tolerable if Mr Leong’s posts are balanced by other
contributors’. For example, I really enjoyed reading the post by Joseph Teo
on 15 Feb which carefully and clearly explained why the Government does now
understand how the free market works. But, Mr Leong has contributed far too many
articles in recent weeks, and skewed the nature of TOC.

I stopped reading TR some time ago because its views are predicable and highly
skewed. I hope that TOC does not suffer the same fate, and that I do not end up
deleting the bookmark in my browser and the shortcut/icon on my iPhone’s
homescreen.

——-
The following is Mr Leong’s response.


Dear Penny,

I always welcome feedback, and in particular criticism.

As a writer, it kind of “makes your day”!

I do not have any particular response, as I feel that everyone is entitled to their opinion.

Most of the time, I do not know enough about the complex issues that affect Singapore and Singaporeans, to be able to offer “constructive ideas” or solutions.

As an ordinary citizen, I am merely trying to contribute to the discourse, by analysing the statistics, and let readers form their own opinions.

By the way, I think many of the comments, questions, ideas and solutions posted by TOC’s readers, have contributed to the discussion and review of policy issues in Singapore.

Leong Sze Hian

Sze Hian has written more than 250 articles on theonlinecitizen, since we started in December, 2006
.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【诽谤诉讼】总理起诉许渊臣 明年2月15日进行控辩口头辩论

据《网络公民》总编许渊臣代表律师林鼎,在脸书更新信息,已确认控辩双方的口头辩论(Oral Arguments),定在明年2月15日早上10时进行。 他指出,今早(10日)刚接到高庭常务官的通知,控辩双方的口头辩论将在上述日前进行,续由法官林茵倩(Audrey Lim)审理,并开放予民众旁听。 只因一篇文章中,复述了总理弟妹李玮玲和李显扬的指控,总理李显龙提告本社总编许渊臣诽谤。诉讼在今年11月30日进行,一直持续到12月3日。 在上周四完成李光耀生前的私人律师柯金梨供证后,法官指示控辩双方须在一个月内提呈书面陈词,之后有两周时间回复双方陈词。 Lee Hsien Loong v Terry Xu…

金融局查办42金融机构 罚款高达1680万新元

2017年7月1日至2018年12月31日期间,共有42家金融机构,因涉及滥用市场、金融操守不当和洗钱等违规行为,结果被新加坡金融管理局(MAS)惩处,开出总值1680万新元的罚单。 根据金管局于星期三(3月20日)发布的第一份执法报告,该局还对两宗内幕交易案件和一宗未经授权交易案件,罚款总值69万8000新元。 一人因刑事定罪入狱 金管局的调查,也让投资者莫毕亮,在去年1月因造假交易而被判入狱四个月。 2014年,莫毕亮在13个交易日于即将闭市时,进场购买维利顿资源(Wilton Resources)的股票,导致维利顿资源的闭市价,受到 “人为” 推高,制造假象。 2016年5月至2017年的12个月期间,在金管局调查一马公司丑闻调查结果下,有八家银行被惩处共3千万元罚款。 报告由执法部门编制 有关的报告是由金融局执法部门编制,随后将在每18个月发布一次报告。 有关执法部门是于2016年8月成立。除了金融制裁和刑事定罪之外,该报告也指出,已经向金融专业人士发出19项禁令,禁止他们重返金融业,进行了37次谴责和223项警告。所有案件处理至结案时间平均需时8个月。…

Forum letter calls for investigation into role of People’s Association

Two letters in the Straits Times forum page on Friday call for…

20 years of town councils – yet no stake in governance for residents

Objective of having town councils still unmet after two decades, says SM Goh.