by Joshua Chiang

The measures that the Government plan to undertake to ‘strengthen society’ will be overwhelmed by the countervailing forces of the liberal foreign worker policy and the casinos, said Mr Tan Jee Say.

He was one of the three panelists speaking at The Online Citizen’s Budget Forum on Saturday. The other two panelists are Ms Braema Mathi and Mr Leong Sze Hian.

Mr Tan, 57 who was principal private secretary to then-Deputy Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong from 1985 to 1990, and a former government scholarship holder who graduated from Oxford University, was referring to the Budget speech by Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam in which the Minister said the Government would strengthen society by taking further measures to ensure an “inclusive society – where everyone can contribute and share in the country’s progress, regardless of where they start from.”

According to Mr Tan, the foreign workers policy and the two casinos in Singapore are the mainstays of the Singapore economic policy under the current administration.

“They will continue to allow foreign workers to come in,” he said, adding that even though the Government had taken measures to curb the influx of foreign workers, “After the elections, I’m not so sure.”

He was quick to point out that SIngaporeans are not averse to foreigners, but they came too fast, and their quality is suspect. Also, while they were largely employed in the construction sectors in the past, they had now gone into the other sectors of the economy, such as the service sector.

“That will be a destabilizing factor in our society,” he cautioned.

As for the casinos, Mr Tan recalled a trip to Las Vegas where he was told that one in five families have a problem gambler. He asked if Singapore was moving in that direction.

He estimated that currently 45-50% of visitors to the casinos were locals, far more than the estimated 10% when the levy was introduced, (Singaporeans had to pay $100 per person to enter the casinos) a clear sign that the levy isn’t working.

Responding to a question about the economic gains from the casinos and boost they gave to the retail and tourism industries, Mr Tan did not deny there is a multiplier effect. However he asked if Singapore should go into something that is not “morally good” for society.

“Economic development is about having wholesome jobs that can go on in a sustainable basis,” he said. He cited the example of Hong Kong which he said is “more calculating when it comes to money.” And yet despite the success of Macau’s casinos, Hong Kong is able to resist the temptation of having a casino, and it’s economy has nonetheless done very well. The Singapore Government has enough surplus to undertake other industries apart from the casino, he added.

Healthcare: A Social indicator of developed society

Mr Tan also touched on another aspect of the Budget speech, in which the Finance Minister said the Government is taking “major steps to enable Singapore to be a first-rate developed society a decade from now.”

“He said we are not yet first-rate. So where are we? Are we a third rate society?” Mr Tan asked.

He pointed out that for a high-income country, Singapore still lagged behind in key indicators compared to other countries in the same category. According to the World Health Statistics, Singapore has 32 beds per 10,000 population, below the average of 58 per 10,000. Singapore also has only 17 doctors for every 10,000 population. The average is 28 per 10,000 population.

Singapore is also allocating a much smaller percentage of its Budget to heathcare compared to even some developing countries.

According to Mr Tan’s soon-to-be-published paper on how to regenerate the Singapore economy:

Total expenditure on healthcare in Singapore has hovered around 3% of its GDP, below the average proportion of 5 % in low income and lower middle income countries i.e. the poor and developing countries. High income countries (of which Singapore is one of fifty countries classified as belonging to this category by the World Health Organisation or WHO) spend a much higher percentage of about 11%. The bulk of the expenditure in Singapore is borne by private individuals and organisations, and only about a third is accounted for by Government compared to the average figure of 61% in high income countries.

“Why should we wait another 10 more years before we enjoy even this status?” He asked rhetorically at the end of his speech.


More reports on TOC Budget Forum soon.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

ESM Goh will run in elections, warns against falling back from First to Third World

Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong confirmed on Friday that he will…

Indonesia increases pig export to S’pore due to M’sia movement control order

Indonesia has significantly increased its pig export to Singapore in the wake…

律师:巴蒂案存“一连串的失误” 赢公众信任端视当局能否妥善、公开检讨

印尼籍前女佣巴蒂胜诉一事,仿佛成为本月热门话题,特别是高庭法官陈成安的判决如同在司法界抛下震撼弹,迫使警方、总检察署都得检讨案件,内政兼律政部长尚穆根也表示,将在下周的国会会议发表部长声明。 在Audent Chambers事务所服务的高级律师哈碧星,于《海峡时报》撰文分析前女佣巴蒂案。他提到有鉴于巴蒂案件“一连串的失误”(the chain of errors),任何的检讨都不应被拘束,也不该将问题归咎于某些人为疏失而已。 “应视此案为检视和解决现有机制缺陷的重要契机。” 哈碧星认为,这不意味着要打击警方、总检察署、法院等维护公共利益的努力,反之,也不该对司法机构的疏失羞于启齿。 在高庭法官陈成安的判决中,点出所谓“赃物”移交警局过程存在疑点。包括廖家声称开箱检查女佣留下的三大箱子并报警,但警方迟至五个星期才去取证和分类“赃物”,且未立即取走,而是一年半后才将这批物件保管。 再者,尽管巴蒂的母语是印尼语,但警方却以英语和马来语问话,且只让她检视不清楚的图片,而不是实际涉案物品。这同样引起许多疑点,包括这是否符合警方搜证的程序?如是,那么其他案件的证物搜证是否也被影响? 再者,若巴蒂案件的搜证与正常程序不同,那么负责警员这么做的原因何在?那么负责检控的检控官,难道没发现搜证过程出问题吗? 尽管总检察署没有义务去解释检控的决策,惟考量到巴蒂案牵涉群众利益,透明化乃是去建设对体制信任的一个关键。…

“反对地方选举因担心华裔掌权” 马伊党主席被呛“种族主义者”

反对恢复地方选举,因担心华裔掌权?马国伊斯兰党(PAS)主席哈迪阿旺,出席英国的一场对话会上遭一名出席者当面呛声为“种族主义者”。 哈迪阿旺在本周二前往伦敦,在Holiday Villa酒店举办的对话会上与旅居当地的马国群众交流。 会上一名出席者询问有关恢复地方选举的议题时,哈迪阿旺表示,本身在过去曾多次担心华裔掌权,因此反对恢復地方选举。 强调地方选举应具包容性 哈迪认为,选举应该具包容性,不应被特定族群垄断。 “如果只有居民可以参选,那么大城市如吉隆坡、怡保、檳城、芙蓉及新山,肯定会被行动党华裔所垄断。到时他们会把酒精、赌博合法化。选举应该公开给包括德士司机、商人和所有让城市运作的人。” 他表示,如果只有单一种族掌权,恐怕513事件会再度上演。 哈迪阿旺的对话会直播在第34分钟,突遭火爆出席者呛声,场面一度尴尬。此事甚至获得马国国营电视台报导:  当哈迪提到513事件时,有关发问男子立马反驳哈迪的说法,并指责哈迪的思维“还停留在1969年。” “如果你要马来西亚进步,能够与其他国家竞爭,你必须脱离这种旧有的思想!”…