by Gerald Giam

Two weeks ago, when I first read the news of the protests in Egypt, which followed the popular uprising and toppling of the government in Tunisia, I cynically remarked to my wife that the protests will carry on for a few days then fizzle out. Life in Egypt will then return to “normal” under the authoritarian rule of President Hosni Mubarak, who has been in power for the past 30 years.

How wrong I was–and how glad I am that I was wrong! Just over an hour ago, Mubarak’s resignation was announced on state television by his recently-appointed vice-president, Omar Suleiman. Following that brief 30-second message, scenes of jubilation erupted on Tahrir (Liberation) Square in central Cairo. Al Jazeera reported of protesters dropping to their knees in prayer and then rising and chanting “God is great”. A 30-year old Egyptian Al Jazeera reporter dropped all pretences of impartiality and shared that all her life she had known no other leader but Mubarak, and described her feelings of elation at his departure. Even the state television station newscaster reportedly cracked a smile after reading out her report. CNN reported that demonstrations initiated over the Internet, on Facebook and Twitter, had resulted in the downfall of the Middle East’s strongest dictators.

This is a momentous occasion for not just Egypt but the entire Arab world. Indeed, the “people power” revolution in Egypt will be an inspiration for all freedom-loving people in oppressed nations around the world.

I visited Egypt about six years ago as part of a diplomatic delegation when I was working in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. From our meetings with academics, journalists and officials there, I got the distinct impression that this was not just a great ancient civilisation, but a nation brimming with suppressed intellect and potential. At the time I was there, the main opposition leader, Ayman Nour, had just been released from prison and there were minor street protests against the government led by the Kifiya (Enough) movement. In the six years that passed since, little seemed to have changed. Nour would later get convicted and jailed again, following a creditable run at the presidency in the elections that year.

Last week, I watched a BBC programme which interviewed some educated Egyptians at local cafes to ask them for their views on the protests. One middle aged woman remarked that the young people on Tahrir Square were doing what her generation always wanted to do but never dared to.

Indeed, every nation has its generation of heroes, who often comprise of the younger generation–more energetic, more idealistic and less cynical of the possibility of change. I believe Singapore’s time for change will come soon. For the past 50 years, we too have been under the authoritarian rule of a party that pays lip service to the ideals of democracy and political freedom. While we have not suffered from the same economic mismanagement that Egypt has, our level of political suppression exceeds that of Egypt in many ways. For example, even a one-man protest is disallowed under “public order” laws passed just last year. How will we ever see scenes of hundreds of thousands of pro-democracy demonstrators thronging the Padang?

A march along St Andrew's Road outside City Hall, 1964.

Yet I remain hopeful in the sensibility of Singaporeans. While I do not wish to see mass protests bringing our economy to a standstill, I hope that this election year, Singaporeans from all walks of life and all generations will turn out in force at election rallies to declare their support for democracy and freedom from fear. I hope that my fellow citizens will take the time and effort to study the candidates and their track records carefully, and vote with their hearts and their heads, not out of fear or ignorance.

We can have our own “mini-revolution” this year by giving the ruling party a historically low popular vote (less than 60 per cent will do the trick) and breakthrough with one or more GRCs. This is a prospect that I am much less cynical about, than I was about the Egyptian revolution!

The writer is an Executive Council member of the Workers’ Party. This article was first published in geraldgiam.sg


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Dr Lee Wei Ling calls Bilahari Kausikan’s allegations on Lee Hsien Yang bought Oxley house for S$1 as “baseless” and “false”

Dr Lee Wei Ling refuted Bilahari Kausikan’s – a retired diplomat –…

PSP member expelled by party after circulating baseless claims about party members

A member of the Progress Singapore Party was expelled by the party…

不堪群众申诉? 公积金退休存款计划最高领入息年限 下调至90岁

由于接收到公积金成员的投诉,表示退休存款计划95岁的最高领取年限太长,政府在上月表示将探讨会员领取入息的年限。 而人力部长杨莉明,在昨日于国会透露,上述针对公积金退休存款计划(Retirement Sum Scheme)的检讨已完成,将把发放年限缩短至90岁。受影响会员为明年7月1日或之后满65岁;以及那些已开始领入息的会员。 人力部估计经开始领取入息的约16万会员中,超过6万人的每月入息会增加。 人力部举例,一名在2009年满55岁、退休户头当时有5万3000元的会员,到2019年已增至8万5000元。假设今年开始领入息,若照旧制(领至95岁),每月入息仅470元;但是政策调整后,到90岁每月可领取520元。 退休存款计划一直以来都是1958年以前出生会员的主要退休支出。考虑到退休户头的基准利率是4巴仙,该计划旨在确保会员在未来20年期间,每月领入息或直至退休账户余额用尽。 过去人力部指出,由于预期寿命的延长,也增加了成员的风险,可能会出现超支的现象。 曾有会员申请缩减领入息期限 事实上,在本社此前报导的其中一个个案Zol,申诉他每月领482元,显然不足以应付日益膨胀的生活开支,他参考新加坡平均寿命85.4年,向公积金局申请把派息期限缩减到20年和增加每月入息。 然而“爱民如子”的公积金局担心,Zol到了老年可能过早把退休储蓄用完,为此拒绝了Zol的申请。 当时公积金局向Zol解释,到了55岁若符合全额退休存款(FRS)(约17万6000元),加上4巴仙利息,到了符合入息年龄,20年内每月可提取910元。但是无法达到全额退休存款者,则会按比例获得入息,最低为每月250元,而Zol的情况下是28年每月入息482元。…

Marcos Jr. criticised at home after watching Singapore F1 with PM Lee Hsien Loong

AP News reported yesterday (3 Oct) that the Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. was…