The following is an article by Very Fine Commentary posted on 7 February 2011.

by Hou Shi Hang

Free market or government intervention? It depends on your priorities.

Despite the strong stance of the Washington Consensus against government intervention, it is not a logical inevitability that governments will mess up the distribution of goods and services. It is merely a tendency that governments generate a degree of inefficiency. Inefficiency is not in itself a condemnation, while efficiency should be seen as an advantage rather than a definitive end, as there are inevitably other social goals that must be considered. Similarly, the efficiency of the free market is not proof that it is the “correct” method of economic distribution.

My Waterway at Punggol (HDB)

One good example of this principle is the Singaporean housing system. In most countries, the housing market is dominated by the free market. The government usually acts to supplement the market by providing for low-income households, or to promote home-ownership through legislation or housing subsidy. Unlike most other countries, Singapore does not emphasise the role of the free market in the provision and distribution of flats. For new flats, the Housing and Development Board (HDB) has relied on queuing, and, since 2002, the Built-To-Order ballot system. This is highly reminiscent of the heyday of central planning. The rationale for indulging in central planning in this case is to avoid price volatility in the housing market and to make sure low-income households are not left out. This is an attempt to “legitimise” the market by making the prices more palatable to low income groups. The high degree of control the government wields also allows it to use housing policy for social ends; the government incentivises marriage by making new HDB flats eligible only for married couples or two or more singles above 35. Similarly, HDB flats have to abide by an ethnic integration policy and maintain a certain ethnic ratio, all in the name of maintaining racial integration.

To continue reading, click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Bukit Brown Family Day

~By: Erika Lim~ “A family outing at a cemetery?! Are you crazy…

疑兜售纸巾被阻 轮椅阿叔攻击地铁站员工

疑在阻止在地铁站内售卖纸巾,乘坐电动轮椅的阿叔愤怒地频频用脚踢赶地铁站工作人员,但是最后却跌坐在地上。 有关事件相信发生于11月21日,发生在武吉士地铁站,靠近B出口,通往滨海市区线的通道上。 有网民摄下轮椅大叔攻击地铁站员工的一幕,于周日(16日)分享到社交媒体上,瞬间引起网民纷纷议论。 在脸书群组Fake News – Singapore上,仅有8秒钟的视频帖子写道,“乘坐轮椅的年长者被地铁站工作人员告知,不能在地铁站内招揽和售卖纸巾。但是,年长者却试图用轮椅撞向工作人员,并从轮椅上滑下来。有关视频已经在WhatsApp中流传”。 视频中只见一名大叔坐在轮椅上,朝向身穿白色衬衫的地铁站工作人员逼近,甚至用双脚频频攻击对方,相信是被阻止售卖纸巾而感到不满。相反的,地铁站工作人员则一直退后,甚至举起双手避免触碰到对方。 两人在斜道上“纠缠”,最后卡在墙边,相信是因为用力过猛,导致大叔从轮椅上滑下来。 网民热议孰是孰非 视频吸引了超过6万6000人观看,甚至有211个留言,评论着谁是谁非。 部分网民认为地铁站工作人员不应该干扰这些老人家,他们都是为了赚取一口饭吃,应该睁一只眼闭一只眼。…

S$72 million to support manpower upskilling in the built environment (BE) sector

An additional $72 million will be set aside over the next two…

The first woman in Legislative Council of Hong Kong continues to fight for democracy

Last month, South China Morning Post (SCMP) published a story on the…