by Leong Sze Hian

I refer to the article “Muslims can be both religious and patriotic” (ST, Jan 30).

It states that “Dr Yaacob was speaking to reporters while at Mendaki, the Muslim self-help organisation, to present cheques for a range of community projects. A total of $370,000 was given out to 39 organisations to fund programmes to help less privileged Malay-Muslim families”.

Does this mean that on the average each of the 39 organisations received about $9,487 ($370,000 divided by 39)?

How many “less privileged Malay-Muslim families” will be helped on the average, by each organisation?

How much help?

If each organisation helps say just 100 families, does it mean that the programmes providing assistance on a per family basis, may only be worth about $8.20 a month ($9,487 divided by 100 families by 12 months)?

And what happens after 12 months (in the above example) when the funding runs out?

In this connection, it was reported in the media in 2006 that a common electronic database of 105,000 Malay-Muslim recipients of financial aid programmes in Singapore had been launched.

So, how many of these 105,000 still need help, and how many will be helped by how much, by the subject funding of $370,000?


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Netizens slam Government for taking action against rap video by local YouTube star Preetipls that critics “brownface” advertisement for E-Pay

An advertisement created for epaysg.com, an e-payment website, was recently released featuring…

Yishun North NPC: Appeal for information of criminal misappropriation

Yishun North Neighborhood Police Centre (NPC) posted an appeal for information on…

Reach cancels feedback forum on elected presidency cancel forum citing reason of “poor response”

Government feedback portal, REACH, had scheduled to hold a public forum on…

悲情牌救不了行动党傲慢 林鼎批李总理群众演说沦空谈

“李显龙打“怀旧牌”,过于依赖前总理的政绩;他描绘长远的未来,但是对于今天人民行动党一手造成的问题,什么也不说。” 这是反对派“人民之声”领袖林鼎,对于李显龙的国庆群众大会演说的评价,他揶揄总理的国庆群众演说,比较像是“竞选演说”,尝试拉拢选民在来届选举继续支持。 他预计来届选举很快就来临,呼吁选民为半世纪以来最为决定性的政治宣战做好准备。 林鼎认为,李显龙的致词并未振奋人民对国家前景的信心,反之更显得为政府政策辩解,还无耻地向他们常常欺骗的选民捞选票。 “他们说要给国家稳定,可是人民得到的是动荡不安—水电费起价造成的物价飞涨,这都是执政者反动思维和极度短视造成的。演说中的政策随后遭到网民挞伐和嘲讽,可见人民不因此买单。” [iframe id=”https://web.facebook.com/plugins/video.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fweb.facebook.com%2FMrLimTean%2Fvideos%2F325684771332518%2F&show_text=0&width=560″] 李显龙推出的“默迪卡一代配套”涵盖从1950-1959年出生的50万选民,林鼎认为,他们付出劳力协助建构第一世界国家,但即使物价飞涨薪水却不涨,也从没有把公积金归还给他们。 为养活家人、为了建设国家,他们牺牲与孩子相处的时间,付出长工时打拼。结果现在还有很多“默迪卡一代”,即便拥有专业技能,却只能靠驾驶私召车过活。 “他们当中有许多是我国最亮眼、杰出的一群,但是很多人都没有足够的退休积蓄,因为大部分的公积金都用来偿还定价过高的公共组屋贷款。” 至于涵盖69岁以上的45万年长人口的“建国一代”,也已发现到政府提供的辅助配套,已经难以应付飙涨的医疗成本。 在2011年,已故李光耀曾提及公共组屋不可能贬值,这也成为李显龙长年以来的论述基础。可是反观今天,他干脆不强调这论点了,而是推出整修组屋计划尝试安抚老百姓,却选择忽略最根本的现实问题—…