by Leong Sze Hian

Source: news.xin.msn.com

I refer to the Ministry of Manpower’s (MOM) “Employment Situation in Fourth Quarter 2010” report released on 31 January.

It states that “Local employment grew by 54,200 in 2010, exceeding the 41,800 gains in 2009. With the strong economic recovery and higher demand for manpower, foreign employment increased by 58,300 in 2010, after declining by 4,200 in 2009”.

This means that employment for locals grew by 12,400, whereas employment for foreigners grew by 62,500.

Despite all the rhetoric and assurances that the import of foreign workers will be scaled back, these latest statistics seem to reveal otherwise.

The fact which I believe no media report has highlighted is that foreign employment growth was five times that of locals.

If we adjust for permanent residents (PRs) from the locals data, how much of the employment growth was for Singaporeans?

Since the number of new citizens and PRs was 48,023 (29,265 PRs and 18,758 new citizens) last year, how many of the 54,200 growth in local employment went to Singaporeans?

According to the report, as at December 2010, there were 1,990,700 locals forming 64.2% of the 3,102,500 persons employed in Singapore. The remaining 35.8% or 1,111,800 were foreigners.

Since we do not have the break-down for locals into Singaporeans and PRs, if about 20 per cent of local workers are PRs, then the total proportion of non-Singaporean workers may be inching close to half the total workforce.

The overall unemployment rate also rose slightly to a seasonally adjusted 2.2% in December 2010 from 2.1% in September 2010. Among the resident labour force, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was unchanged at 3.1%.

Why is it that the unemployment rate has risen in the light of Singapore’s record 14.7 GDP growth and frequent media reports of a very tight labour market, over the last few months?.

Since there were 48,023 new citizens and PRs last year, I surmise that the Singaporean unemployment rate (if known) may have risen, given that the growth in local employment was on a relative to “new citizens and PRs” context, only 54,200.

By the way, the non-seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for locals increased from 2.6 per cent in the third quarter to 2.7 per cent in the fourth quarter.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

涉卷走逾三千万元 王赐安加控四失信罪

涉嫌卷走逾三千万元的LC律师事务所管理合伙人王赐安(Jeffrey Ong),今日(8月11日)因涉及私自挪用1170万元的案件,而再加控四项失信罪。 警方发文告指出,据商业事务局调查显示,被告所面对的四项新控状,和精密工程公司Allied Technologies所交托予LC律师楼的款项有关,涉及1170万零20元。 文告中指出,有关款项是精密工程公司于2017年10月份,所交托的股份配售收益。 被告是在今年2月份,因于2017年10月至2018年8月份,涉及挪用3380万元,而被控11项罪名。而截止今日,被告目前已面对57项欺诈、失信和伪造控状。 案件目前尚在调查中。

728集会已捕获49人 港警斥示威者”愈演愈烈“

香港近日来每周都有反送中行动,昨日(28日)港民发起由中环遮打花园游行至中山纪念公园,追究警方7月 21日清场行动的不满,惟警方只批准在遮打花园进行集会。 综合港媒报道,当日数以万计参与集会人士占据德辅道中,经过金钟一直走向铜锣湾方向,沿途示威者以“黑警! 可耻! ”、“时代革命,光复香港”等口号表示抗议。 约下午5点时,示威者更兵分多路,除了部分示威者留守遮打花园,示威者纷纷向西环、铜锣湾、湾仔前进。部分示威者经过湾仔警总时不对叫骂,但暂时未有包围行动。 但截至晚间7时,示威者聚集于西区警署,警方开始清场,部分激进示威者更向警方投掷砖头等杂物,警方以适当武力制止及驱散,并使用催泪烟,避免与示威者正面冲突。 行动期间,有激进示威者在多处地方纵火,警民冲突再次升级。 警方批示威者行为愈演愈烈,表示已49人被捕 警察公共关系科高级警司余铠均,于凌晨(29日)召开记者会指事件至今共49人被捕,并予以最严厉谴责,批评他们行为愈演愈烈,激进示威者以“ 致命武器”袭击警员及四围纵火,亦有示威者以桠杈向警员射钢珠、投掷漆弹、怀疑腐蚀性液体及路牌等。 同时也批评示威者尽管仅获得遮打花园的示威批准,却仍不遵守指示,纷纷向东、西散去,造成交通阻塞,严重妨碍路况。…

遏止“tekan”文化呼声高 现假账号忙护主灭火

星期一,国防部长黄永宏在国会报告调查委员会结果,证实第一精卫营士兵在行军前晚被体罚,没有获得充足休息,成间接导致中暑身亡因素。 各大本地中英媒体皆报导,大部分网民除了惋惜年轻生命的离去,也不认同和呼吁检讨军中的“tekan”文化,甚至也有感同身受者分享经历,希望早日遏制不良霸凌风气。 不过,《网络公民》发现这些留言的网民中,却穿插着假账号,声称自己作为两个孩子的妈,感谢国防部采取行动。 这个名为Rosna Razak的假账号,留言道:组织群体庞大,难免会出现失误。但当局承诺将改善至少让我们看到一线希望。安息,年轻的孩子,感谢你为国家的付出。 另一网民Woo Soo Chen则指出,常年来已有多少霸凌个案发生,甚至延伸到其他机构,这种“tekan”文化必须遏制;但Liam Lee却认为,tekan已成军训的一部分,不可能让士兵成为经不起压力的草莓。 在《今日报》脸书,Rosna Razak也出现留言,指国防部的举措,可能一些人认为是做戏,但对于家长来说,至少看到有行动提升服役生涯的安全保障。 此外,还有另一账号Saravanan…

NO to minimum wage but YES to wage cuts, NO to increasing burden for businesses but YES to passing burden to workers

by Augustine Low The proposal by the Workers’ Party for a minimum…