The following article first appeared in Reinventing the Rice Bowl

Why cooling measures and subsidies offer no solutions to rising prices and declining fertility

by Kenneth Jeyaretnam

The question I’m most asked by Journalists is, “What are the issues this coming election?” The answer I most often give is that they haven’t changed that much from the previous election. There is really only one key issue this coming election. It is housing, it is immigration, and it is the cost of living. They are one because they are all part of the same.

When you take a closer look at supply and demand as it relates to HDB housing it becomes clearer that the issues remain the same because the government is a behemoth incapable of reacting fast enough to changing circumstances that it is itself responsible for. An analogy might be a brontosaurus with several primitive brains in different parts of the body so that there is no central coordination. Immigration and housing are specifically two sides of the same coin. In its simplest form we have too many people and not enough housing.* According to Singapore in Figures 2010 ** the stock of HDB flats rose by only about 11,000 units between 2004 and 2009. At the same time the Singapore resident population rose by 461,000 between 2000 and 2009 and the total population rose by nearly a million.

Another journalist asked me for my opinion on the statistic, widely disseminated around the web, that 85% of Singaporeans own HDB housing. That figure originated with a senior civil servant responding to The Reform Party’s proposals for easing our HDB woes. Crucially it was that 85% live in HDB housing not own it. I re-educated that journalist who corrected the mistake but the wider public don’t make the distinction and a myth is peddled.

At this moment the resources are not available for me to calculate the exact statistic but the number of HDB managed units at end 2009 was 888,143. If we divide this by a resident population of 3.7 million this comes down to roughly 25% ownership. Then you need to factor in children and joint ownership and we don’t know what the actual percentage of that 888,000 is rental. The actual ownership percentage is probably below 50% of adults. So the majority of Singaporeans would benefit from lower prices as it would enable them to gain a foothold on the property market or move to a bigger property.

To read the rest of the article, click here.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】行动党、工人党有何区别? 林志蔚:行动党倾向资本一方

工人党盛港集选区候选人林志蔚,认为当人民行动党在政策上“比较倾向资本一方”,反观工人党的目的,则是协助新加坡工友们在国家收入上取得较大的份额。 林志蔚本身也是位经济学家,本身拥有美国哈佛大学历史学硕士、美国加利福尼亚大学圣克鲁兹分校国际经济学、哲学博士,目前也是ESSEC商学院经济学副教授。 行动党荷兰-武吉知马候选人维文,是在昨晚(1日)在新传媒的电视辩论,在问答环节时乘机暗讽工人党“像行动党”或是“精简版的行动党”(PAP-Lite),维文指自己也读了工人党的竞选宣言,行动党也可以写出和工人党一样的宣言,只不过工人党的主张略微偏左。 然而,林志蔚也反驳,行动党工人党之间最根本的差别,乃是双方在哪些方面作出取舍。前者倾向资本方,但工人党则多为新加坡工友考量如何在国家收入取得较大份额。 他也指出,在每一元国家收入中,新加坡工友仅取得42角,反观日本则能取得55角,这显示本地工友取得的份额不足。所以工人党认为,重新检讨这种收入分配,是很有必要的。 林志蔚称,工人党不是为了反对而反对,大家是要正确能帮助到人民的政策。再者,该党宣言也是有根有据,都有统计考量。

Forced to download TT & SGSecure: The startling truth hidden in the reviews of government apps

In the light of grievances being aired relating to Singapore government apps—namely…

All eyes will be on Hougang – the lightning rod of the nation

~ By Jen ~ Singaporeans living in the Tanjong Pagar GRC must…