by Singaporean Sophist

I refer to the article “MM Lee: Family backgrounds play important role in students’ learning environment“.

Statistically, there is nothing factually wrong with saying that kids whose parents have degrees tend to fare better in academics. The Economist cites OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) research, saying that,”Parents who graduated from university are far more likely than non-graduates to raise children who also earn degrees. This is true in all countries, but more so in America and France than in Israel, Finland or South Korea, according to the OECD.” With due respect, what MM Lee said was absolutely true, but it’s very insensitive to utter those remarks when A) it’s a politician who does it, and B) he said it in a public school at that.

The mission of a public education system is meant to facilitate social mobility. What’s the point of saying something that discourages that very mission? It’s extremely counter-productive and antithetical to everything this country stands for in the spirit of meritocracy.

I do not think it is necessary to harp on about what our education system has achieved. It is fundamentally sound and gives our children the needed competitive edge to excel in this era of globalization, but we should at first acknowledge that it has its critical flaws that severely hamper social mobility. Below are several points that will address the flaws:

1. Regulate private tuition

Let’s not kid ourselves. Our education system is heavily supplemented by not just school-held enrichment classes, but also by private tutors. Some may think of them as overcharging parasites, some think of them essential to the system because teachers are incapable of teaching their children well enough. I’ve been through the “elite” schools as an ACS(I) boy and I can attest to the substantial sums of money that are spent on private tuition so that the students could get into the “elite” schools, and move on to excel in them onwards to JC.

Private tuition is costly. It may not be as prohibitive as trying to buy a new car, but the additional costs are hefty enough to leave the everyday heartlander out of the picture and denies them the advantage that private tuition offers in order to compete in our local system. Private tuition will not go away for good, so it has to be regulated. Every private tutor has to be registered and their fees regulated as well.

But that will be merely treating the symptom, not the cancer that eats away at the education system and oppresses the kids. What can be done to get rid of the cancer?

2. Reduce the complexity and insanity of primary school syllabus

Before people retort that relaxing standards will make our children less competitive, I want to cite the observations made by Malcolm Gladwell in “Outliers”. He observes that as long as people are trained to a certain level of capability for general intellectual pursuits, overdoing it becomes redundant and a waste of time and resources as a person with “good enough” training will perform just as well as an overtrained person.

This isn’t advanced university education we’re talking about. This is primary school education. These are young minds we’re talking about here and there’s only so much they can do and absorb before they break down. The syllabus and curriculum needs to be significantly relaxed for the kids to play and grow and dream. Foundations are important, but destroying the kids’ minds in the process and numbing them to the joys of learning is counterproductive.

To further help in this cause, streaming in primary school should be abolished. Children these days feel helpless and categorized like things instead of being treated like proper human beings. Streaming can wait till secondary school. This leads on to-

3. Effective training for teachers

Our teachers have one of the most unenviable careers in this country and I salute them. It’s difficult to stay in this field for long without having genuine passion for their work and they need to be better equipped for the job with better training so that they can better cope with the syllabus, and the students need not resort to private tuition.

Take a look at this, and understand how Finland manages to keep pace with Asian students in international contests without potentially damaging their children’s psyches.

4. Cease the madness in examinations

School is where children go to, to learn how to be proper members of society. One of the key lessons that the kids learn is that if you work hard and play by the rules, you will be rewarded accordingly. Makes sense right?

But this hasn’t been the case until 1-2 years ago when the kids have been studying their textbooks and find their PSLE papers to have questions that feature nothing in their textbooks. Students with natural inborn talent score well in those papers and those who get left behind feel that they have not been rewarded properly for following the rules. What happens then? They stop giving a damn when they go to secondary school and a good lot turn to delinquency.

I used to work at a LAN gaming center for 18 months and have been part of a gaming clan for 7 years. One of the young customers I spoke to was a former gangster and he recounted how he stopped caring about studying ever since his primary school experience demonstrated to him that he wouldn’t be rewarded well even if he followed the rules and studied hard. Now we get surprised that someone got hacked to death by youngsters at ages 16-19 at Downtown East?

The textbooks and tests are a contract between teacher and student: I tell you what to study in them, you study it and I set questions from the textbook. If you do well in the test, well done and good job. This contract applies also in universities when the professors give out the syllabus for the semester, and students have the right to bring it to the dean if there is a discrepancy.

Our Ministry of Education has broken that contract with our kids many, many times at the PSLE until recently when the madness stopped, and the exam papers have resembled sanity befitting of primary school education. This madness needs to stop for good – we cannot afford this to be a mere temporary measure.

___________________________________________

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【选举】林绍权人品遭质疑 王瑞杰促挺身澄清

针对人民行动党准候选人林绍权,遭网民抨击实为“精英主义者”,且“很好练”,行动党第一助理秘书长王瑞杰认为,前者应站出来,为自己澄清。 王瑞杰今早(6月27日)走访西海岸集选区时,受媒体采访询及相关问题后,他指出若准候选人的人品受到质疑,那么就应该正视并作出澄清。 他指出准候选人的人品和诚信非常重要,既然已经被质疑了,而且评论者也没有隐瞒身份,因此他认希望向他们了解详情。 他认为双方的说法都应该听取后,再做评论更适合,所以希望林绍权能够站出来回应评论。 无论如何他指出,准候选人拥有一个为民服务的心,是至关重要的。 有网民发文,指林在新加坡武装部队服务时“表现得高高在上”,与其展现的朴实形象不符合;也有者揶揄,林绍权“固执”,有时还很“好练”(福建方言,形容一个人爱炫耀) 林绍权回应 据知林绍权今日(27日)中午发声明,指出一些指责是无证据的,包括自己也没涉及吉宝岸外与海事集团在巴西的贿赂案件。 他说,船厂工作环境辛苦吃力,因此自己要求同事维持高标准、能安全回家。 至于军中事件,他指出一些贴文指他要严厉,他则解释,当时部队人员隔日清晨5时,要提早出外训练,“因此按照规定,我必须确保大家有充足的休息,所以才会要求部下在前一晚10时报到。”

再有青少年马路飙电动脚车

我国阻断措施要到6月2日才逐步开放,然而不少青少年已经安耐不住,甚至在马路上公然飙电动脚踏车。 个人代步工具在去年就已经是热门课题,甚至设定了年龄限制,然而脸书群组All Singapore Stuff上,有不愿具名的读者上传了年轻电动脚踏车骑士,半夜三三两两在马路上狂飙的视频。 视频中至少有三名骑士在马路上飙车,有一名骑士甚至载着一人,视频似乎就是由乘客所录下。 视频在短短4小时就吸引了逾万人观看,不少网民怒斥这群青少年是无视法律,在错误的地点驾驶还使用手机,是造成马路杀手的帮凶,更指他们完全就是在挑战法律。 也有网民表示,这群青少年不仅非法在马路上“飙车”,还没有保持安全距离,都可能造成病毒传播的风险。

TOC Campaign Roundup: PAP’s chaotic campaign staggers towards finish line

Andrew Loh with input from the TOC team / The People’s Action…

民众没去广州却收到12封电邮通知! 酷航摆乌龙致歉

由于从新加坡赴中国的航班,因为防疫需要一些手续有变,为此新加坡酷航也发电邮通知乘客。不料即使非乘客、近期也没有任何出国行程的民众,也不明不白收到信息,令人丈八金刚摸不着头脑。 原本上述来自酷航的通知,是电邮给即将在来临周日(8月30日),出发前往广州的航班乘客,解释中国当局在防疫上的一些变动,包括登记五天前需出示核酸检测阴性证明等。 不过,即便没有任何出国行程的网民Enzo Enyo Ang,也接连收到多达12封来自酷航的电邮,令他莫名其妙,“我知道大家都很担心冠病疫情,但酷航你也不用一连发12道电邮给我吧?再者我也没打算出门,更何况是广州。” 新加坡知名网红新加坡李健敏,不忘调侃:“看来有些人需要好好跟老婆大人解释,为何他们来临周日要去一趟广州?” 据了解,酷航已在脸书发文致歉,表示上述通知原本是发给本月30日TR100航班的乘客,却误传给其他根本没有出行的用户。酷航仍在调查事件,初步所知并未发生数据或个资遭骇或泄露的问题。