The following article is sent to us by a member of the public. In the interest of fairness, TOC will be happy to post any reply from the MP or the organizers.

by Richard Seah

Source: indianapublicmedia.org

My block of flats was blessed, or should I say cursed, tonight with the visit of the (I won’t say “my” since I did not vote for him) Member of Parliament, Mr Inderjit Singh.

The occasion was the launch of polling for the Home Improvement Programme, which I support. And to mark this auspicious event, the Residents’ Committee organised a “getai” or stage show with, as usual, very very LOUD music. The stage is just below my block of flats and from my apartment on the 12th floor, the noise level is deafening.

I called the police at 7.35 pm and was told that an officer would be sent down to investigate. Nothing happened.

I went downstairs and caught the attention of one busy looking official. I told him the noise was very loud and he said he would tell the people to turn down the volume. Nothing happened.

I called the police again. It was about 7.55 pm and I was again assured that some officers are on the way. Nope! I did not see any.

Meanwhile, a gentlemen smiled at me and invited me to view the exhibition. I invited him to come upstairs and hear how loud the noise is from my flat. He tried gesturing to the sound technicians to ask them to reduce the volume, but by that time, the MP had arrived and was about to begin his speech. So the sound level was left as it was.

I could not tolerate anymore. As the MP was leaving after his speech, I called out to him and pointed out that the noise was very very loud. He listened for a short while, surrounded by plenty of presumably RC officials, and told me that this was a one-off event.

I countered that it was not a reason to be inconsiderate towards residents, but he quickly lost interest in what I had to say. “Thank you for your feedback,” he said and made an attempt to walk off. I managed to grab his attention a bit more… Then he gave the classic PAP line that shirks responsibility: “This is organised by the residents for the residents.”

Singing for Home Improvement (photo by Richard Seah)

Oh I see! It has nothing to do with him, it’s not his fault, there is nothing he can do about it. He cannot even advise one of the many people surrounding him to show some consideration and turn down the volume. But wait… That’s not all. The MP is suggesting that it was, in fact, MY fault. I, being a resident, am part of the group that organised this annoying event, doing it for other residents like me!

Wow! This, surely, is democracy. For the residents, by the residents! I must be thankful that I live in such a wonderfully democratic country. What an ungrateful complainer I am!

Next, some of the group of people that were surrounding the MP asked for my particulars, saying that since I lodged a complaint they needed to know who I was. I had no qualms about giving, but when I asked just for their names, not even their IC numbers and other details, they refused to give. One quickly walked away. The one who wrote down my particulars absolutely refused even after I asked several times. When we finished what we had to say to each other, he offered to shake my hand. Errrr… should I shake the hand of someone who would not tell me his name? Well, I guess people in general do practise double standards, not least those who surround politicians.

By 8:30 pm, the noise was still unbearable. I called the police a third time. I asked if they would do anything about the loud noise. This time, the policeman did not say that his officers will definitely come down to investigate. Instead, he said, “So far you are the only person who called?”

So naturally I asked if it meant the police are not going to do anything about it. “If more residents called we will surely take action,” he continued. I asked for his name, which he gave. I then asked if I can write a letter to the newspapers quoting him saying that since I was the only caller, the police would not take action. He denied having said that. I reminded that he said if more people called the police would take action. Can I quote him on that? No?

He tried to explain further… By then I had become like the MP. I lost interest in listening to what he had to say. I guess he and I do share some things in common.

It’s 9:46 now as I finished writing this article. The noise is still loud!

PS: It is 9:56 by the time I finish editing this article. To be fair, the show and the noise finally ended.

>> Do you live in Richard’s block? And if so, do you agree with his views?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Chiam See Tong: Government treats CPF as a business

By Kumaran Pillai – I had to make a quick stopover after…

Singapore ranks second most powerful passport after UAE

Singapore’ passport has fallen to the second place in the 2018 Passport Index,…

Will others emulate Dr Toh?

~by: Tan Jee Say~ My memories of close encounters with Dr Toh…

总理多次鼓励“造人”增加人口 惟年轻国人为养儿育女成本头痛

《今日报》报导,本月10日,总理李显龙在出席新加坡日本商工会议所50周年对话会上,曾表示新加坡人口目前应该可以再增加。 他表示,“我们为新加坡制定了许多合适的措施,包括在建设新产业、学校、机会、市镇、公园等,我们都一直致力为下一代打造新社会,但我们现在最需要的是“新人民”-我们的子女儿孙。” 他透露,我国每年约3万5000人出生,以及3万5000名登记成为永久居民,而在众多永久居民中,高达两万人是成为新加坡公民。换言之,约5万5000人中,有36巴仙是移民者。 然而他表示,若出生率在近四至五年内没有成长,我国人口可能就开始面临下滑的问题。 三分一青年30岁前不婚? 其中的原因为,约三分之一的迈向30岁的青年均选择不婚,因为他们需要将焦点聚焦在他们的事业上,许多青年认为他们需要在婚前有更多积蓄,以确保减少婚期及婚后生活压力,包括办理酒席、房子、装修与孩子的养育费用。 李显龙也表示,新加坡目前也试图协助上班族母亲育儿,透过设置工作的灵活度与建立婴儿照护、日托等建设,使母亲能够在分娩后重返工作岗位。 “若他们计划生孩子,他们一定会考量孩子对职业的影响以及孩子的养育责任,许多母亲也会这么做,所以我也能理解,这并不容易实现。“ 当然,这也不是总理第一次鼓励年轻国人“努力造人”。不管是2014年的新年贺词,或是最近一次在公开场合,他都鼓励国人多生育,认为新加坡在教育、医疗和住房等完善设施和良好环境,并强调这是国人完全可以担起的责任。 想生就生?养孩子并不简单 然而, 对于年轻父母来说养育孩子也并非易事,高昂的养育费用往往让夫妻吃不消。…