by Joshua Chiang

A performance on the death penalty by artist/activist Seelan Palay was disallowed just a day before it was to be staged at the Substation.

Titled ‘Choices, Chances’, it was meant to be the closing piece in a series of short performances presented by contemporary artists to be staged on the 15th of January.  The other performances were unaffected.

According to Palay, the proposal for the performance was submitted to MDA (Media Development Authority ) two weeks before the performance. (Under the Public Entertainment and Meetings Act, most public performances require an Arts Entertainment License)

A few days before the scheduled performance the MDA informed the organizers of R.I.T.E.S by phone of ‘problems’ with his proposal. Palay’s proposal had stated that his performance would include the use of photographs of people who had been hanged in Singapore, such as Vignes Mourthi and Amara Tochi. He would also be giving out photocopied photographs of Malaysian drug trafficker Yong Vui Kong to the audience as part of the performance.

Yong had been sentenced to death in January 2009. He has been granted a stay of execution pending decision on appeal.

“They (MDA) said they had problems with the photographs and it would take longer to process the license,” Palay said.

Concerned that the license would not be approved in time for the performance, Palay decided to replace the photographs with flowers.

But on the day before the performance, Palay was told that MDA would not grant the license for his performance. The reason was because of the use of a set of dice in his performance.

“They claimed that I’m trying to suggest that the judicial process is unfair,” Palay said. It was a claim he denied.

“First of all, who are they (MDA) to interpret what it means?” he said. “The dice was about the choices they have made in their lives and the chances they have of getting hanged.”

This is the second time Palay’s works have been banned. His film, One Nation Under Lee was ‘unofficially’ banned in 2008 because it contained footage of ‘Zahari’s 17 Years’, a film about ex-ISA detainee Said Zahari that was banned in 2007. Another one of his films about Francis Seow was still in the process of being rated one year after Palay’s submission.

Palay felt that MDA’s rejection of the license could be due to the fact that Yong Vui Kong’s hearing regarding the clemency process was to take place on 17th Jan, two days after the his scheduled performance. However, he asserted that he didn’t plan his performance to coincide with the hearing.

Calling MDA’s move ‘high-handed’, Palay asked, “Does that mean no artist will be able to make a work on the death penalty unless it’s really abstract and nobody knows what it’s about?”

“They have invisible OB markers which they expect local artists to somehow know,” Palay continued. “And because of that it leads to a lot of self-censorship.”

In the end, Palay had to verbally describe his performance to the audience.

He then concluded cryptically, “Unfortunately, this performance, like fundamental freedoms in this country, will remain a figment of your imagination.”

Death Penalty in arts – green light or red light?

Even though Justice Quentin Loh had stated in the verdict to the Alan Shadrake case that individuals can, and have the right to air views on the death penalty in public , it appears that MDA still remains unsure of its position in allowing the issue to be featured in the arts.

In the same series of performances that saw Palay’s piece banned, artist Lee Wen was given the green light to perform ‘Highway 69’. a song that touched on death penalty.

Last Meals exhibition along Esplanade Tunnel last January (source: Todayonline)

In 2005, the MDA withheld the licence for the play  “Human Lefts” unless some scenes were edited and all references to the death penalty removed.

In January last year, an exhibition on American death row convicts and their last meals was displayed along the Esplanade Tunnel for two weeks.

When contacted, MDA replied that Palay’s performance  was disallowed as it was “improper in the depiction of the legal system.” It also directed TOC to the full set of guidelines online.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

会员投诉退休存款计划领取年限太长 政府称检讨工作预计年底完成

由于接收到公积金成员的投诉,表示退休存款计划95岁的最高领取年限太长,政府将探讨会员领取入息的年限,检讨工作最迟在今年底完成。 据《今日报》报导,人力部在周一(7日)针对议员胡美霞的质询回应,表示人力部与公积金局正在检讨退休存款计划(Retirement Sum Scheme,简称RSS)的入息发放,预计审查工作将在今年年底完成,结果会再公布。 退休存款计划一直以来都是1958年以前出生的公积金成员的主要退休支出。考虑到退休户头的基准利率是4巴仙,该计划旨在向会员在未来20年期间,每月领入戏或直至退休账户余额用尽。 人力部指出,由于预期寿命的延长,也增加了成员的风险,可能会出现超支的现象。 “2018年,一半以上的65岁新加坡居民将可能延长寿命至85岁以上,五分之一的居民更是上升至95岁。” 因此,人力部表示,政府分别于2008年和2016年推出了额外利息。 而公积金局也指出,若在普通账户、特别账户、医疗储蓄账户与退休账户共首批达6万元的成员,将会在每年额外获得一个百分点的利息。至于55岁以上的成员,首批达3万元以上,将可以获得每年额外的一个百分点利息。 人力部表示,该措施将可延长支付期限逾20年,同时也降低了民众老年储蓄耗尽的可能。 “即使延长了期限,公积金局也能确保退休存款计划不会超出95岁。” 然而,人力部也证实确实受到成员的反馈,认为支付期限长达95岁太长了。对此,人力部也正在解决问题。…

India’s dysfunctional court system with 40 million pending cases threatens CECA deals

Bloomberg published a news article on Tuesday, highlighting how difficult doing business…

学生群组公开 国大三年逾20起偷窥、猥亵问题

国立大学偷拍风波因受害者马芸公开而曝光,引起各界义愤。根据该校一个学生群组公开的一份校内清单,展示国大从2015-2018年的校内违规和纪律惩处记录,显示其中有超过20起涉及偷窥、非礼等纪律。 该校一个学生群组“国大学生联合”(NUSSU – NUS Students United Facebook page),在本月20日于脸书专页公布一份清单,是新加坡国立大学纪律委员会2015年至2018年的听证报告。 去年11月,23岁受害者马芸在校园宿舍洗澡时,遭到一名24岁男同学偷拍。但是有关涉事学生仅被给予12个月的有条件警告。马芸曾表示,自己因涉事者的行为陷入痛苦,无法接受他的惩罚这么轻,对方就好像发生事都没发生一样,继续生活。最终致使马芸选择在社交媒体公开,希望能警惕他人。 国大在事件曝光后,随即在官网公布,将设立检讨委员会,来审视与制定新的规章制度。 停学、踢出宿舍、强制辅导、罚款和道歉 本社简略整理国大学生群组公开的校内纪律记录,其中可见该校处分的纪律案例中,其中就有超过20起涉及非礼,违规行为类型包括男女性被偷拍、跟踪、偷窥、擅自闯入女性宿舍、猥亵、偷女性内衣物及触摸大腿与臀部等。…

之前七患者皆在中国染病 台湾爆发首宗本土感染病例

台湾爆发首宗本土传染武汉肺炎确诊病例,当地政府立刻向前往中国者发出警告,呼吁人民若非必要,避免前往中国。 台湾和中国有着密切的经济和文化联系,而该岛至今已经出现了八宗确诊病例。 台湾中央及流行疫情指挥中心召开紧急发布会指出,岛上最新的第八宗病例是岛上的首宗本土传染病例,之前的病例患者都是在中国感染上的。 最新确诊病例患者为居住在台湾中部的50余岁男子,他是受到自中国工作返乡的妻子感染。目前男子的情况稳定。 另一方面,指挥中心表示已经向居民们发出警告,尽管香港和澳门除外,但是若非必要就不要到中国湖北省。 台湾也限制了大部分中国游客入境。 台湾政府于上周宣布一项为期一个月的禁令,禁止出口医务人员专用口罩,并表示必须先照顾自己人民的需要。 目前当地一些药房都面临口罩货源不足问题,而政府已经表示会努力确保供应,并宣布将发布更多口罩,但是限制每个人最多只能购买三个口罩。 台湾总统蔡英文在新年会民活动上指出,政府已经做好充分准备应对武汉肺炎的袭击,促请人们不要惊慌。“我们的防疫工作不会放假,而是每天24小时进行。”