(Part 5 of the Singapore Census 2010 Series)

by Leong Sze Hian

According to the recently released Singapore Census 2010, Singaporeans are getting older. Citizens aged between 45 and 54, now form the largest age group, compared to 2000 when it was those between 35 and 44.

Healthcare affordability

When I read this, the first thing that came to my mind was – no wonder Singaporeans have listed the affordability of healthcare as one of their greatest concerns, in practically every survey done in recent years.

In this regard, a good starting point in my view, is to examine how much Class C hospitalisation bill size has increased, as it is the cheapest option for Singaporeans.

Class C bills increase by as much as 100%

Source: KKH

In this connection, I refer to media reports (“Jump in hospital bills over past four years“, ST, Jan 8) about the jump in hospital bills over the past four years.

The Ministry of Health’s (MOH) remarks that the almost doubling on the high end of the average bill for a subsidised C-class patient in a public hospital in the four years since 2006, is partly due to patients asking for non-subsidised drugs and implants, is rather puzzling.

Patients request more expensive drugs?
How would patients know and  ask for  non-subsidised drugs and implants?

Aren’t these in the treatment guidelines of the hospital, which doctors are duty bound to inform their patients?

Has the number and proportion of non-subsidised items in C-class been increasing over the years?

Looking at the statistics provided by MOH, average surgical bills have increased by at least 50 per cent at six out of the seven public hospitals.

In my volunteer work doing financial counseling for the need, I have come across C-class bills of around $90,000 due primarily to very expensive drugs that are not subsidized, for just over a month fs stay in public hospitals.

Since C-class is already the cheapest hospitalization option for Singaporeans, and non-subsidised items are also generally not covered by CPF approved medical insurance, the trend of increasing healthcare costs and non-subsidised items may pose an increasing financial strain on patients and their family members.

What are MOH’s plans to address this problem?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

雅虎编辑点评王瑞杰:多磨练

雅虎新闻编辑Nicholas Yong,昨日发表一则社论,阐述他个人如何看待副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰在本周二(5日)于国会提呈动议,辩论时与工人党议员等人交锋时的表现。 ”手忙脚乱,还掉了球。不管你喜欢用哪种体育形容词,在周二的国会上王瑞杰似乎都做到了。“ 本周二,王瑞杰提出动议,要求刘程强和林瑞莲回避一切和阿裕尼-后港市镇会相关财政事务。原本球就在他手上,这场赛事等着他表演。经过长达一小时的严厉说教,他理应和总理和82位行动党议员一起,来个大灌篮。 尽管动议最终在52票赞同、九位工人党议员反对下获得通过,但是在动议开始进行的前数分钟,王瑞杰就不得不要求”暂停“。当工人党议员林瑞莲,甚至是相对温和的后港议员方荣发质询时,他看起来筹措不定,像个要做课堂报告的学生般翻查着档案。 “即便方荣发不是天才演说家,然而他让58岁的财政部长显得措手不及。” 王瑞杰要求休会的理由?“因为林瑞莲…提到由我提出有关观点不妥当,故此我要求休会,让我们考量此事后再作答复。” 就这样,策略被颠覆了。国会复会后,由律政部高级政务部长唐振辉等人接手,对阿裕尼-后港市镇会判决左右开弓,然而已无法补救王瑞杰的开球。 Nicholas Yong在评论中认为,尽管行动党仍占据绝对主导地位,然而立法议会仍是辩论公共利益课题的重要平台。不论辩论的素质如何,国会始终是一个政治舞台,这是全球历史悠久的传统。 与英国下议院或美国众议院相比,新加坡国会的气氛较温和,但仍会出现激烈交锋和火花。 仅报业控股和新传媒可看国会直播…

GE2020 Results: PAP wins Mountbatten SMC with 73.84% of the vote

Mountbatten SMC has been officially called for People’s Action Party’s (PAP) Lim…

Why I am excited about the S-League 2011

by Damon Yeo The 2011 edition of our domestic league kicks off…

Must we wait for the fire before we listen to our conscience?

by Brad Bowyer On this Easter Sunday, I can’t help but think…